Tracking 3D coplanar points in the invariant perspective coordinates plane

Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn 1, Issue , 1996, Pages 493-497

  Gurdjos, Pierre ^a   Dalle, Patrice ^a   Castan, Serge ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

DISCRIMINATORY POWER; EUCLIDEAN COORDINATES; GEOMETRICAL CONSTRAINTS; POINT COORDINATES; RECONSTRUCTION ACCURACY; RECONSTRUCTION PROBLEMS; REFERENCE POINTS; RELATIVE POSITIONS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 0343090344     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICPR.1996.546075     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. I. Cox. A review of statistical data association techniques in motion correspondence. International Journal of Computer Vision, 10(1):53-66,1993.
2. J. Crowley. Sensor Fusion, chapter "Principles and Techniques of Sensor Data Fusion". Springer Verlag, J. K. Ag-garwal edition, 1990.
3. R. Haralick. Monocular vision using the cross-ratio. In Proceedings of the 6th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis (SCIA'89), volume II, pages 943-952, Oulu, Finland, June, 19-22 1989.
4. P. Horain. Computing the precision of localization in a plane using projective invariants. Technical report, TELECOM Paris, France, 1993.
5. I. K. Sethi and R. Jain. Finding trajectories of feature points in a monocular image sequence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9(1):57-73, January 1987.
6. S. Intille. Trackink using a local closed-world assumption : Tracking in the football domain. Technical Report 296, M. I. T. Media Lab Perceptual Computing Group, 1994.
7. J. Weng, T. S. Huang, and N. Ajuha. 3D motion estimation, understanding, and prediction from noisy image sequences. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9Q):370-389, 1987.
8. K. Kanatani. Computational projective geometry. C. V. G. I. P : Image Understanding, 54(3):333-348,1991.
9. K. Astrom. Random cross ratios. In Proceedings of the 9th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis (SCIA'95), pages 1053-1060, Uppsala, Sweden, june 1995.
10. K. Rangarajan and M. Shah. Establishing motion correspon-dance. C. V. G. I. P. : Image Understanding, 54(1):56-73, 1991.
11. L. Morin. Quelques contributions des invariants projectifs a la vision par ordinateur. PhD thesis, I. N. P. Grenoble, France, January 1993.
12. O. Faugeras. Three-dimensional Computer Vision : a geometric viewpoint. MIT Press, Boston, USA, 1993.
13. P. Gurdjos and P. Dalle. Specification d'un mecanismede visualisations multiples pour l'analyse automatique de scenes de sports collectifs. In Proceedings of Interface to Real & Virtual Worlds, pages 241-250, Montpellier, France, february 7-11 1994.
14. P. Meer, S. Ramakrishna, and R. Lenz. Correspondence of coplanar features through p2-invariant representations. In Proceedings of the I2thl. CP. R- (ICPR'94), volume A, pages 196-202, Jerusalem, Israel, 1994.
15. R. Deriche and O. Faugeras. Tracking line segments. In Proceedings of the lstE. C. C. V(ECCV'90), pages 259-268, An-tibes, France, april 1990. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
16. T. Reiss. Recognizing planar objects using invariant image features. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 676. 1993.
17. Z. Zhang. Analyse du mouvement a partir d 'une sequence de scenes stereoscopiqueset applications a la robotiquemobile. PhD thesis, Universite de Paris-Sud, centre d'Orsay, France, October 1990.