Intraoperative PAR Corneal Topography System (CTS): Comparison of its keratometric readings to manual keratometer, auto-keratometer, Eyesys Corneal Analysis System, and slit lamp PAR CTS in healthy eyes

CLAO Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 151-158

  Uçakhan, Ömür Ö ^a   Sternberg, Gary ^a   Bodian, Carol ^b   Kelliher, Kevin ^b   Asbell, Penny A ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KERATOMETRY; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NORMAL HUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIMULATION; SLIT LAMP;

ADULT; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0343081407     PISSN: 07338902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Warnicki JW, Rehkopf PG, Curtin SA, et al: Corneal topography using computer analyzed rasterstereographic images. Applied Optics 1988; 27:1135-1140.
2. Litoff D, Belin MW, Winn SS, et al: PAR Technology Corneal Topography System. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32 (suppl):922.
3. Belin MW, Litoff D, Strods SJ, et al: The PAR Technology Corneal Topography System. Refract Corneal Surg 1992;8:88-96.
4. Belin MW, Zloty P: Accuracy of the PAR Corneal Topography System with spatial misalignment. CLAO J 1993;19:64-68.
5. Belin MW: Intraoperative raster photogrammetry-the PAR Corneal Topography System. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993;19 (suppl):188-192.
6. Belin MW, Cambier JL, Nabors JR, Ratliff CD: PAR Corneal Topography System (PAR CTS): The clinical application of close-range photogrammetry. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:828-837.
7. Hannush SB, Crawford SL, Waring GO, et al: Accuracy and precision of keratometry, photokeratoscopy, and corneal modeling on calibrated steel balls. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:1235-1239.
8. Hannush SB, Crawford SL, Waring GO, et al: Reproducibility of normal corneal power measurements with a keratometer, photokeratoscope, and video imaging system. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108: 539-544.
9. Koch DD, Foulks G, Moran C, Wakil J: The EyeSys corneal analysis system accuracy and reproducibility of first-generation prototype. Refract Corneal Surg 1989;5:424-429.
10. Tsilimbaris MK, Vlachonikolis IG, Siganos D, et al: Comparison of keratometric readings as obtained by Javal ophthalmometer and corneal analysis system (EyeSys). Refract Corneal Surg 1991;7:368-373.
11. Koch DD, Wakil JS, Samuelson SW, Haft EA: Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyoSys corneal analysis system model I. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:342-347.
12. Wilson SE, Verity SM, Conger DL: Accuracy and precision cf the comeal analysis system and the topographic modeling system. Cornea 1992;11:28-35.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreenent between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 1986; 8: 307-310.
14. Varssano D, Rapuano CJ, Luchs JI: Comparison of keratometric values of healthy and diseased eyes measured by Javal keratometer, EyeSys, and PAR. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 419-422.
15. Thall EH, Lange SR: Preliminary results of a new intraoperative corneal topography technique. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19 (suppl): 193-197.
16. Binder PS: Videokeratography (Review). CLAO J 1995; 21 133-144.
17. Roberts C: The accuracy of 'power' maps to display curvature data in corneal topography systems. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 3525-3532.
18. Naufal SC, Hess JS, Friedlander MH, Granet NS: Rasterstereography-based classification of normal corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 222-230.