Simple individual based models of movement, alignment and schooling behaviour

Future Generation Computer Systems

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 873-882

  Schönfisch, Birgitt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Alignment; Attraction; Cellular automata; Dimer automata; Schooling behaviour

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATA THEORY; CELLULAR ARRAYS; DECISION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CELLULAR AUTOMATA; DIMER AUTOMATA;

PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0342995787     PISSN: 0167739X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-739X(00)00065-0     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Aoki I. A simulation study on the schooling mechanism in fish. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 48:1982;1081-1088.
2. R. Durrett, Ten lectures on particle systems, in: P. Biane, R. Durrett (Eds.), Lectures on Probability Theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1608, Springer, Berlin, 1995, pp. 97-201.
3. Edelstein-Keshet L., Ermentrout G.B. Models for contact-mediated pattern formation: cells that form parallel arrays. J. Math. Biol. 29:1990;33-58.
4. Huth A., Wissel C. The simulation of the movement of fish schools. J. Theoret. Biol. 156:1992;365-385.
5. Reuter H., Breckling B. Selforganization of fish schools: an object-oriented model. Ecol. Model. 75:1994;147-159.
6. C.W. Reynolds, Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioural model, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '87, Comput. Graphics 21 (1987) 25-34.
7. Schönfisch B., Hadeler K.P. Dimer automata and cellular automata. Physica D. 94:1996;188-204.
8. Stöcker S. Models for tuna school formation. Math. Biosci. 156:1999;167-190.