Perfusion parameters in MRI of pancreas transplants;Perfusionsparameter in der MRT-diagnostik von pankreas-transplantaten

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 172, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 38-42

  Marx, C ^a,b   Konig M ^a   Luck R ^b   Klempnauer, J ^b   Heuser, L ^a  

^a Inst fur Radiol und Nuklearmed   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

MRT; Pancreas; Transplantation

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORGAN CIRCULATION; PANCREAS PERFUSION; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW;

EID: 0342948818     PISSN: 09366652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fernandez MP, Bernadino ME, Neylan JF, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic transplant dysfunction: Value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhance MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156: 1171-1176
2. Vahey TN, Glazer GM, Francis IR, et al. MR Diagnosis cf pancreatic transplant rejection. AJR 1988; 150: 557-560
3. Vendrik DJ, Hentsch A, König M, Heuser L. Magnetic resonance imaging in the post-surgical assessment of the pancreas, in combined pancreas-kidney transplantations. In: Oudkerk M, Edelman RR (Hrsg). High-power gradient MR-imaging. Advances in MRI II. Berlin: Blackwell Wissenschaft Berlin 1997: 431-436
4. König M, Luka B, Martin D, Golin U, Büsing M, Heuser L. Bildgebende Verfahren in der Diagnostik nach Pankreastransplantation. Chir Gastroenterol 1996; 12 (suppl 1): 54-60
5. Pfeffer F, Büsing M, Adam U, Hopt UT. Indikation und Kontraindikation zur Pankreastransplantation. Chir Gastroenterol 1996; 12 (suppl 1): 9-13
6. Pozniak MA, Propeck PA, Kelcz F, Sollinger H. Imaging of pancreas transplants. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1995; 33 (3): 581-594
7. Nghiem DD, Corry RJ. Technique of simultaneous renal pancreatoduodenal transplantation with urinary drainage of pancreatic secretion. Am J Surg 1987; 153: 405-406
8. Shokouh-Amiri MH, Gaber AO, Gaber LW, et al. Pancreas transplantation with portal venous drainage and enteric exocrine diversion: a new technique. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 776-777
9. Sibley RK, Sutherland DE. Pancreas transplantation: An immunohistologic and histopathologic examination of 100 grafts. Am J Pathol 1987; 128 (12a): 151-170
10. Klassen DK, Weir WR, Schweitzer EJ, Bartlett ST. Isolated pancreas rejection in combined kidney-pancreas transplantation: Results of percutaneous pancreas biopsy. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 1333-1334
11. Yuh WTC, Hunsicker LG, Nghiem DD, et al. Pancreatic transplants: Evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 170: 171-177
12. Yuh WTC, Wiese JA, Abu-Yousef MM. Pancreatic transplant imaging. Radiology 1988; 167: 679-683
13. Huber A, Holzknecht N, Heuck A, Stangl M, Reiser M. Erste Erfahrungen mit der kontrastverstärkten MR-Angiographie nach Nieren-und Pankreastransplantation. Radiologe 1997; 37: 239-242
14. Fuld IL, Matalon TA, Vogelzang RL, et al. Dynamic CT in the evaluation of physiologic status of renal transplants. AJR 1984; 142: 1157-1160
15. Jansen VO, Cmelin E, Burmester E, et al. Analyse von dynamischen CT-Kurven bei Nierentransplantaten mit Abstoβungsreaktion und Cyclosporin-A-Intoxikation. RÖFO 1989; 151: 473-476
16. Blomley M, Dawson P. Theoretical aspects and physiological models. In: Miles K, Dawson P, Blomley M (Hrsg). Functional Computed Tomography. Oxford: Isis Medical Media 1997: 47-59