Increased risk of restenosis after placement of gold-coated stents: Results of a randomized trial comparing gold-coated with uncoated steel stents in patients with coronary artery disease

Circulation

Volumn 101, Issue 21, 2000, Pages 2478-2483

  Kastrati, Adnan ^a,b   Schömig, Albert ^a   Dirschinger, Josef ^a   Mehilli, Julinda ^a   Von Welser, Nicola ^a   Pache, Jürgen ^a   Schühlen, Helmut ^a   Schilling, Tassilo ^a   Schmitt, Claus ^a   Neumann, Franz Josef ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Restenosis; Stents; Thrombosis; Trials

Indexed keywords

GOLD; HEPARIN; STEEL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY THROMBOSIS; CORONARY STENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS; RISK; SURVIVAL;

EID: 0342858846     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.21.2478     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P. Kiemeneij F. et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489-495.
2. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496-501.
3. Erbel R, Haude M, Hopp HW, et al. Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1672-1678.
4. The EPISTENT Investigators. Randomized placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet. 1998;352: 87-92.
5. Dirschinger J, Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, et al. Influence of balloon pressure during stent placement in native coronary arteries on early and late angiographic and clinical outcome: a randomized evaluation of high-pressure inflation. Circulation. 1999;100:918-923.
6. Schömig A, Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, et al. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary artery stents. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1084-1089.
7. Leon MB, Baim DS, Popma JJ, et al. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1665-1671.
8. Rogers C, Edelman ER. Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis. Circulation. 1995;91:2995-3001.
9. Hehrlein C, Zimmermann M, Metz J, et al. Influence of surface texture and charge on the biocompatibility of endovascular stents. Coron Artery Dis. 1995;6:581-586.
10. Barth KH, Virmani R, Froelich J, et al. Paired comparison of vascular wall reactions to Palmaz stents, Strecker tantalum stents, and Wallstents in canine iliac and femoral arteries. Circulation. 1996;93:2161-2169.
11. Sheth S, Litvack F, Dev V, et al. Subacute thrombosis and vascular injury resulting from slotted-tube nitinol and stainless steel stents in a rabbit carotid artery model. Circulation. 1996;94:1733-1740.
12. Edelman ER, Rogers C. Stent-versus-stent equivalency trials: are some stents more equal than others? Circulation. 1999;100:896-898.
13. Zitter H, Plenk H Jr. The electrochemical behavior of metallic implant materials as an indicator of their biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;21:881-896.
14. Ignatius MJ, Sawhney N, Gupta A, et al. Bioactive surface coatings for nanoscale instruments: effects on CNS neurons. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;40:264-274.
15. Alt E, Schömig A. The Inflow coronary stent. In: Serruys PW, Kutryk MJB, eds. Handbook of Coronary Stents. London, UK: Martin Dunitz; 1998:265-273.
16. Tanigawa N, Sawada S, Kobayashi M. Reaction of the aortic wall to six metallic stent materials. Acad Radiol. 1995;2:379-384.
17. Hafeli UO, Warburton MC, Landau U. Electrodeposition of radioactive rhenium onto stents to prevent restenosis. Biomaterials. 1998;19: 925-933.
18. van Beusekom HMM, Tuin J, Kutryk MJB. Stents up-close: electron micrographic appearance. In: Serruys PW, Kutryk MJB, eds. Handbook of Coronary Stents. London, UK: Martin Dunitz; 1998:317-343.
19. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease: implications for patient selection. Circulation. 1990;82:1193-1202.
20. Pomerantsev EV, Kobayashi Y, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. Coronary stents: in vitro aspects of an angiographic and ultrasound quantification with in vivo correlation. Circulation. 1998;98:1495-1503.
21. Kobayashi Y, De Gregorio J, Kobayashi N, et al. Stented segment length as an independent predictor of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34: 651-659.