Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox without entanglement

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 4144-4145

  Horodecki, Ryszard ^a   Horodecki, Michał ^a   Horodecki, Paweł ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

^b GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0342858778     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.4144     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. C. H. Bennett, D. DiVincenzo, Ch. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P. Shor, J. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999).
2. J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, NY) 1, 195 (1964).
3. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
4. N. D. Mermin, J. Am. Phys 66, 920 (1998)
5. J. Am. PhysH. Stapp, 66, 924 (1998).
6. The question of whether global measurements can be more efficient than local measurements was first raised in A. Peres and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1119 (1991)
7. Phys. Rev. Lett.see also, S. Massar and S. Popescu, 74, 1259 (1995).
8. D. Dieks, Phys. Lett. 92A, 271 (1982)
9. W. K. Wooters and W. H. Żurek, Nature (London) 299, 802 (1982).
10. One could argue that superluminal signaling supresses the IRL. However, it is not clear whether it is true for our definition of ILR, so that we prefer to keep the assumption on no signaling.