Distributed, heterogeneous computing environment for multidisciplinary design and analysis of aerospace vehicles

Advances in engineering software

Volumn 31, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 707-716

  Sistla, R ^a   Dovi, A R ^a   Su, P ^a  

^a Computer Sciences Corporation ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE VEHICLES; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; DATA STRUCTURES; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PRODUCT DESIGN; RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS;

COMMON OBJECT REQUEST BROKER ARCHITECTURE (CORBA); MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGNS; OBJECT-ORIENTED DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0342844472     PISSN: 09659978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0965-9978(00)00014-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Radovchich NA. Some experiences in aeroelastic design of structures [PADS]. Recent experiences in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Part 1, NASA CP-2327, April 1984. p. 455-503.
2. Ladner FK, Roch AJ. A summary of the design synthesis process, Society of Aeronautical Weight Engineers Paper 907, 1972.
3. D'Vari R, Baker M. A static and dynamic aeroelastic loads and sensitivity analysis for structural loads optimization and its application to transport aircraft, AIAA Paper 93-1643, April 1993.
4. Raymer D.P. Aircraft design: a conceptual approach. AIAA education series. 1992;AIAA, Washington, DC.
5. Townsend JC, Weston RP, Eidson TM. A programming environment for distributed complex computing. An overview of the framework for Interdiscipilinary design optimization (FIDO) project. NASA TM 109058, December 1993.
6. Salas AO, Townsend JC. Framework requirements for MDO application development. AIAA Paper 98-4740, September 1998.
7. Krishnan R. Evaluation of frameworks for HSCT design optimization. NASA/CR-1998-208731, October 1998.
8. Siebel T.M., House P. Cyber rules. 1999;Doubleday, New York.
9. Englander R. The Java series Developing JAVA Beans. 1997;O'Reilly.
10. Akarsu E., Fox G., Haupt T. DARP: Java-based data analysis and rapid prototyping environment for distributed high performance computations. Concurrency: Practice & Experience. 10:(11-13):1998;1097-1105.
11. Sistla R, Dovi AR, Su P. An object oriented framework for HSCT design, HPCCP/CAS Workshop 98. NASA/CP-1999-208757, January 1999. p. 171-6.
12. Sistla R, Dovi AR, Su P, Shanmugasundaram R. Aircraft design problem implementation under the Common Object Request Broker Architecture. In: Proceedings of the 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials (SDM) Conference, AIAA-99-1348, April 1999.
13. Vinoski S. CORBA: Integrating diverse applications within distributed Heterogeneous Environments. IEEE Communications. 14:(2):1997.
14. Object Management Group. The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification, 2.0 ed., July 1995.
15. Asbury S., Weiner S.R. Developing Java enterprise applications. 1999;Wiley, New York.
16. Biedron RT, Samareh JA, Green LL. Parallel computation of sensitivity derivatives with application to aerodynamic optimization of a wing, HPCCP/CAS Workshop 98. NASA/CP-1999-208757, January 1999. p. 219-24.
17. Krist SL, Biedron RT, Rumsey CL. CFL3D User's Manual (Version 5.0). NASA/TM-208444, June 1998.
18. Samareh JA. A novel shape parameterization approach. NASA/TM-1999-209116, May 1999.
19. Vanderplaats GN. CONMIN - a FORTRAN program for constrained function minimization user's manual. NASA TM-X-62282, August 1973.
20. Walsh JL, Young KC, Pritchard JI, Adelman HM, Mantay WR. Integrated aerodynamic/dynamic/structural optimization of helicopter rotor blades using multilevel decomposition. NASA TP 3465/ARL TR 518, January, 1995.
21. Townsend JC, Salas AO, Schuler PM. Configuration management of an optimization application in a research environment. NASA/TM-1999-209335.
22. Woodward FA. USSAERO Computer Program Development, Versions B and C. NASA TM-110175, June 1995.