Computational science and engineering

ACM Computing Surveys

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 810-817

  Sameh, A ^a   Cybenko, G ^b   Kalos, M ^c   Neves, K ^d   Rice, J ^e   Sorensen, D ^f   Sullivan, F ^g  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

^e PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g IDA Center for Computing Sciences

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0342728918     PISSN: 03600300     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/242223.246865     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BARUCCI, E., LANDI, L., AND CHERUBINI, V. 1996. Computational methods in finance: Option pricing. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Spring), 66-80.
2. BERRY, M. ET AL. 1996. Lucas: A system for modeling land-use change. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Spring), 24-35.
3. BOARD, J., KALÉ, L., SCHULTEN, K., SKEEL, R., AND SCHLICK, T. 1994. Modeling biomolecules: Larger scales, longer durations. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Winter), 19-30.
4. BROWNE, S., ET AL. 1995. The National HPCC Software Exchange. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Summer), 62-69.
5. COE, T., ET AL. 1995. Computational aspects of the pentium affair. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Spring), 18-31.
6. CORNEA-HASEGAN ET AL. 1995. Phase refinement and extension by means of non-crystallographic symmetry averaging using parallel computers. Acta Crystallogr. D51, 749-759.
7. CRUTCHER, R. 1994. Imaging the universe at radio wavelengths. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Summer), 39-49.
8. DONGARRA, J., GROSSE, E., PATT, Y., CHAUDY, K. M., AND MURAOKA, Y. 1996. Taking stock, looking ahead, five essays. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Summer), 38-45.
9. GALLOPOULOS, E., HOUSTIS, E., AND RICE, J. 1994. Computer as thinker/doer: Problem-solving environments for computational science. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Summer), 39-49.
10. GOUDREAU, G. 1994. Computational structural mechanics: From national defense to national resource. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Spring), 33-42.
11. IEEE 1994a. NSF panel charts future of HPC. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Spring), 79-81.
12. IEEE 1994b. Site report: The Army High Performance Computing Research Center. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Summer), 6-8.
13. IEEE 1994c. Site report: Cornell Theory Center. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Winter), 10-13.
14. IEEE 1994d. Site report: San Diego Supercomputer Center. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Fall), 10-14.
15. IEEE 1995a. Site report: ICASE: NASA Langley's CSE Center. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Spring), 6-14.
16. IEEE 1995b. Site report: Sandia National Laboratories. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Summer), 10-15.
17. IEEE 1996a. Interview with David Kuck: What is good parallel performance and how do we get it? IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Spring), 81-85.
18. IEEE 1996b. Site report: Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Spring), 8-12.
19. JOHNSON, C. ED. 1995. Theme issue on: Computational inverse problems in medicine. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Winter), 42-77.
20. JOHNSON, C., AND MATHESON, M. 1993. Computational medicine: Bioelectric field problems. Comput. Computation. Sci. Eng. (Oct.), 59-67.
21. KAHANER, D. 1994. Stiff competition: HPC in Japan. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Summer), 84-86.
22. KING, S. 1995. A numerical journey to the Earth's interior. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Fall), 12-23.
23. MARCHIARO, T., ET AL. 1995. UCES: An undergraduate CSE initiative. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Fall), 69-73.
24. NOOR, A., AND VENNERI, S. 1993. A perspective on computational structures technology. Comput. Computation. Sci. Eng. (Oct.), 38-46.
25. PANCAKE, C. 1996. Is parallelism for you? IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Summer), 18-37.
26. RICE, J. 1994. Academic programs in computational science and engineering. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Spring), 13-21.
27. RICE, J, 1995. Computational science and the future of computing research. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Winter), 35-41.
28. SAMEH, A., AND RIGANATI, J. 1993. Computational science and engineering. Comput. Computation. Sci. Eng. (Oct.), 8-12.
29. STONEBRAKER, M. 1994. Sequoia 2000: A reflection on the first three years. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Winter), 63-72.
30. TAFLOVE, A. 1995. Reinventing electromagnetics: Emerging applications for FD-TD computation. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Winter), 24-34.
31. VOLAKIS, J., AND KEMPEL, L. 1995. Electromagnetics: Computational methods and considerations. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Spring), 42-57.
32. WARREN, J. 1995. How does a metal freeze? A phase-field model of alloy solidification. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Summer), 38-49.
33. WOODWARD, P. 1993. Interactive scientific visualization of fluid flow. Comput. Computation. Sci. Eng. (Oct.), 13-25.
34. WILSON, G. 1996. What should computer scientists teach to physical scientists and engineers? IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. (Summer), 46-54. (See also responses by R. Landau and by S. McConnell.)