The potential importance of diversity in Eutypa lata and co-colonising fungi in explaining variation in development of grapevine dieback

Mycological Research

Volumn 103, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 1385-1390

  Peros J P ^a   Jamaux Despreaux I ^a   Berger, G ^a   Gerba, D ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTIVAR; DIEBACK DISEASE; DISEASE DIAGNOSIS; FRANCE; GENETIC DIVERSITY; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; GRAPEVINE; MATING SYSTEM; PATHOGENICITY; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA;

DIEBACK; DISEASE SEVERITY; FUNGAL DISEASE; GENETIC VARIATION; VINEYARD;

FRANCE; LANGUEDOC-ROUSSILLON;

BIONECTRIA OCHROLEUCA; EUTYPA DIEBACK; EUTYPA LATA; FUNGI; GLIOCLADIUM; GLIOCLADIUM ROSEUM; MYXOGASTRIA; PHAEOACREMONIUM ALEOPHILUM; PHAEOACREMONIUM CHLAMYDOSPORUM; PHELLINUS IGNIARIUS; PHOMOPSIS VITICOLA; SPHAEROPSIS; SPHAEROPSIS MALORUM; VITIS;

EID: 0342700220     PISSN: 09537562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0953756299008291     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bisiach, M. & Minervini, G. (1985). Libertella blepharis A. L. Smith e altri funghi associati a una sindrome atipica nella vite. Vignevini 12, 33-35.
2. Bisiach, M., Minervini, G. & Zerbetto, F. (1990). Studi sul deperimento della vite indotto da funghi. Rapporto di attivita. Atti Accademia Italiana della Vite e del Vino 42, 347-360.
3. Bolay, A. & Moller, W. J. (1977). Eutypa armeniacae Hans. & Carter. agent d'un grave dépérissement de vignes en production. Revue Suisse de Viticulture, Arboriculture et Horticulture 9, 241-251.
4. Carter, M. V. (1991). The status of Eutypa lata as a pathogen. Phytopathological Papers No. 32. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, International Mycological Institute: U.K.
5. Chiarappa, L. (1959). Wood decay of the grapevine and its relationship with black measles disease. Phytopathology 49, 510-519.
6. Dubos, B. (1987). Mise au point sur les maladies de dépérissement dans le vignoble français. Le Progrès Agricole et Viticole 104, 135-140.
7. Dubos, B. & Larignon, P. (1988). Esca and black measles. In Compendium of Grape Diseases (ed. R. C. Pearson & A. C. Goheen), pp. 35-35. The American Phytopathological Society: St Paul, MN, U.S.A.
8. Ferreira, J. H. S., Matthee, F. N. & Thomas, A. C. (1989). Fungi associated with dieback and pruning wounds of grapevines in South Africa. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 10, 62-66.
9. Jaccard, P. (1908). Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Société de Vaud Sciences Naturelles 44, 223-270.
10. Jamaux-Despréaux, I., Berger, G. & Péros, J.-P. (1997). Characterization of microflora putatively involved in Esca syndrome on grapevine. Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathological Union. June 1997, pp. 39-41: Montpellier, France.
11. Larignon, P. & Dubos, B. (1997). Fungi associated with esca disease in grapevine. European Journal of Plant Pathology 103, 147-157.
12. Le Gall P. (1992). Eutypiose: résultats de l'enquête 1992. La Vigne no. 30, 38-39.
13. Lehoczky, J. (1988). Black dead arm. In Compendium of Grape Diseases (ed. R. C. Pearson & A. C. Goheen), p. 35. The American Phytopathological Society: St Paul, MN, U.S.A.
14. Mimiague, F. & Le Gall, D. (1994). Bilan sur les enquêtes eutypiose dans le vignoble européen. Quatrième conférence internationale sur les maladies des plantes. Annales de l'ANPP 3, 1265-1270.
15. Moller, W. J. & Kasimatis, A. N. (1981). Further evidence that Eutypa armeniacae-not Phomopsis viticola-incites dead arm symptoms on grape. Plant Disease 65, 429-431.
16. Mugnai, L., Surico, G. & Esposito, A. (1996). Microflora associata al mal dell'esca della vite in Toscana. Informatore Fitopatologico 11, 49-55.
17. Nei, M. (1973). Analysis of gene diversity in subdivised populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 70, 3321-3323.
18. Péros, J.-P. (1995). Sensibilité des cépages à l'eutypiose: le problème du comportement de référence au vignoble. Le Progrés Agricole et Viticole 112, 61-67.
19. Péros, J.-P & Berger, G. (1994). A rapid method to assess the aggressiveness of Eutypa lata isolates and the susceptibility of grapevine cultivars to Eutypa dieback. Agronomie 14, 515-523.
20. Péros, J.-P., Berger, G. & Lahogue, F. (1997). Variation in pathogenicity and genetic structure in the Eutypa lata population of a single vineyard. Phytopathology 87, 799-806.
21. Péros, J.-P. & Larignon, P. (1998). Confirmation of random mating and indication for gene flow in the grapevine dieback fungus. Eutypa lata. Vitis 37, 97-98.
22. Péros, J.-P., This. P., Confuron, Y. & Chacon, H. (1996). Comparison by isozyme and RAPD analysis of some isolates of the grapevine dieback fungus Lutypa lata. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 47, 49-56.
23. Ramos, D. E., Moller, W. J. & English, H. (1975). Production and dispersal of ascospores of Eutypa armeniacae in California. Phytopathology 65, 1364-1371.
24. Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. (1995). GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86, 248-249.
25. Rayner, A D. M. & Todd, N. K. (1979). Population and community structure and dynamics of fungi in decaying wood. Advances in Botanical Research 7, 333-420.
26. Ricard, J. L., Grosclaude, C. & Ale-Agha, N. (1974). Antagonism between Eutypa armeniacae and Gliocladium roseum. Plant Disease Reporter 58, 983-984.
27. Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1359-1370.
28. Wright, S. (1951). The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15, 323-354.