Prediction of outcome in coerced and voluntarily treated alcoholics

International Journal of Social Welfare

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 106-112

  Gerdner, A ^a,b,f   Bodin, L ^c,d   Soderfeldt B ^d,e   Berglund, M ^b  

^a Runnagården Treatment Centre   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c ÖREBRO MEDICAL CENTRE HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d Orebro County Council   (Sweden)

^e KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^f NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0342695149     PISSN: 13696866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.1996.tb00242.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andersen DJ (1981). Perspectives on treatment - the Minnesota experience. Center City, MN, Hazelden.
2. Berglund M (1988). Alcoholics committed to treatment: a prospective long-term study of behavioral characteristics, mortality and social adjustment. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 12(1): 19-24.
3. Bernadt MW, Mumford J, Murray RM (1984). Can accurate drinking histories be obtained from psychiatric patients by a nurse conducting screening interviews? British Journal of Addiction 79: 201-206.
4. Bjerver K (1972). An evaluation of compulsive treatment programs for alcoholic patients in Stockholm with particular reference to longitudinal development, epidemiological aspects and patient morbidity. Opuscula Medico suppl 25.
5. CAN (1990). Rapport 90: alkohol- och narkotikautvecklingen i Sverige [Report 90: The development of alcohol and narcotics in Sweden]. Stockholm, Centralförbundet for Alkoholoch Narkotika-upplysning.
6. Cartwright AKJ (1981). Are different therapeutic perspectives important in the treatment of alcoholism? British Journal of Addiction 76(4): 347-361.
7. Cook CCH (1988). The Minnesota Model in the management of drug and alcohol dependency: miracle, method or myth? The philosophy and the program. Evidence and conclusions. British Journal of Addiction 83: 625-634, 735-748.
8. De Leon G (1984). Program-based evaluation research in therapeutic communities. In: Tims FM, Ludford JP, ed. Drug abuse treatment evaluation: strategies, progress, and prospects. Rockville, MD, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIDA research monograph series 51: 69-87.
9. Duffy JC, Waterton JJ (1984). Underreporting of alcohol consumption in sample surveys. The effect of computer interviewing in fieldwork. British Journal of Addiction 79: 303-308.
10. Fillmore KM, Kelso D (1987). Coercion into alcoholism treatment: meanings for the disease concept of alcoholism. Journal of Drug Issues 17(3): 301-319.
11. Gerdner A, Bodin L, Söderfeldt B (1988). Behandling som hjälp till självhjälp [Treatment as help to self-help]. Örebro, Örebro Läns Landsting - Högskolan i Örebro.
12. Gerdner A, Bodin L, Söderfeldt B, Furuholm P-E (1991). Full-följare och avhoppare i behandling for alkoholism [Completers and dropouts in alcoholism treatment]. Örebro: Socialförvaltningen, Örebro Läns Landsting.
13. Gerdner A, Söderfeldt B (1993). Alkoholism som sjukdom [Alcoholism as disease]. Nordisk Alkoholtidskrift 10(3): 133-143.
14. Gibbs L, Flanagan J (1977). Prognostic indicators of alcoholism treatment outcome. International Journal of the Addictions 12(8): 1097-1141.
15. GLIM (1987). The GLIM System Release 3.77 manual. 2nd edn. Oxford: Numerical Algorithms Group.
16. Hoffmann NG, Ninonueve F, Mozey J, Luxenburg MG (1987). Comparison of court-referred DWI arrestees with other out-patients in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 48: 591-594.
17. Laundergan JC, Spicer JW, Kammeier ML (1979). Are court referrals effective? Judicial commitment for chemical dependency in Washington County, Minnesota. Center City, MN, Hazelden.
18. Laundergan JC (1982). Easy does it - alcoholism treatment outcomes. Hazelden and the Minnesota model. Center City, MN, Hazelden.
19. Luborsky L, McLellan AT (1978). Our surprising inability to predict the outcomes of psychosocial treatments. With special reference to treatments for drug abuse. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 5(4): 387-398.
20. Ogborne AC (1978). Patient characteristics as predictors of treatment outcomes for alcohol and drug abusers. In: Israel Y et al., ed. Recent advances in alcohol and drug problems. Vol 4. New York, Plenum Press.
21. Schlesselman JJ (1982). Case control studies - design, conduct, analysis. New York, Oxford University Press.
22. Skinner HA, Allen BA (1983). Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug and tobacco use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 51: 267-275.
23. Solomon SD (1982). Individual versus group therapy: current status in the treatment of alcoholism. Advances in Alcohol & Substance Abuse 2(1): 69-86.
24. Ulrich J (1981). Two methods of control over results of alcoholism treatment. International Journal on Rehabilitation Research 4(3): 404-405.
25. Vaillant GE (1983). The natural history of alcoholism. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
26. Watson CG, Brown K, Tilleskjor C, Jacobs L, Pucel J (1988). The comparative recidivism rates of voluntary and coerced admission male alcoholics. Journal of Clinical Psychology 44(4): 573-581.
27. Weisner CM (1990). Coercion in alcohol treatment. In: Institute of medicine, broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems. Washington, DC, National Academy Press: 579-609.