Some remarks on the equivalence between 2D and 3D classical snakes and geodesic active contours

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 19-28

  Aubert, Gilles ^a   Blanc Féraud, Laure ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; TOPOLOGY;

CLASSICAL SNAKE PROBLEM; GEODESIC ACTIVE CONTOURS; HAMILTONIAN THEORY;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0342656650     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008168219878     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Caselles, V., Catte, F., Coll. T., and Dibos, F. 1993. A geometric model for active contours. Numerische Mathematik, 66:1-31.
2. Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., and Sapiro, G. 1997. On geodesic active contours. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 22(1):61-79.
3. Kass, M., Witkin, A., and Terzopoulos, D. 1987. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1:321-331.
4. Malladi, R., Sethian, J.A., and Vermuri, B.C. 1995. Shape modeling with front propagation: A level set approach. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(2).
5. Osher, S. and Sethian, J.A. 1988. Front propagating with curvature dependant speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79:12-49.