Teaching scientific integrity and research ethics

Forensic Science International

Volumn 113, Issue 1-3, 2000, Pages 511-514

  Sponholz, Gerlinde ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFLICT; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ETHICS; HUMAN; MORALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; STUDENT; TEACHING; TRAINING; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 0342572521     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00267-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. M. Finetti, A. Himmelrath, Der Sündenfall. RAABE, Bonn, 1999.
2. Macrina F.L. Scientific integrity. Macrina F.L. Scientific Integrity. An Introductory Text With Cases. 1995;1-14 ASM Press, Washington, DC.
3. Recommendations of the Commission On Professional Self Regulation in Science. Proposals For Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice. 1998;Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
4. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft: Verfahren bei Verdacht auf wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten. Verfahrensordnung, 14 November, 1997.
5. The National Research Ethics Council of Finland. Ministry of Education (1998) Guidelines for the Prevention, Handling and Investigation of Misconduct and Fraud in Scientific Research.
6. C. Gunsalus, Lecture during the Workshop Teaching Research Ethics Indiana University, Bloomington, 1998.
7. NIH Guide: National Research Service Awards Guidelines. Volume 26, Number 21, June 20, 1997.
8. Wylo B., Thomsen M. Should physics students take a course in ethics? - Physicists respond. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 4:1998;473-486.
9. G. Sponholz, G. Allert, F. Keller, D. Meier-Allmendinger, H. Baitsch, Das Ulmer Modell medizinethischer Lehre. Sequenzierte Falldiskussion für die praxisnahe Vermittlung von medizinethischer Kompetenz (Ethikfähigkeit). Medizinethische Materialien No. 121, Zentrum für Medizinische Ethik, Bochum, 1999.
10. M. Finetti, Bollwerk gegen Blender. Was tun gegen Betrug in der Wissenschaft? Mit Kursen zur Forschungsethik stehen die Unis Marburg und Ulm bisher allein da. Süddeutsche Zeitung No. 214; 14. 9. 1999, S. V2/12.
11. Korenman S.G., Shipp A.C. Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research through a Case Study Approach. A Handbook for Instructors. 1994;AAMC, Washington, DC.
12. Penslar R.L. Research Ethics, Cases and Materials. 1995;Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
13. Stern J.E., Elliott D. The Ethics of Scientific Research. A Guidebook For Course Development. 1997;New England Press, Hanover, London.
14. Culver C.M., Clouser K.D., Gert B., Brody H., Fletscher J., Jonsen A., Kopelman L., Lynn J., Siegler M., Wikler D. Basic Curricular Goals in Medical Ethics. New Engl. J. Med. 312:1985;253-256.
15. Lo B. Skepticism about teaching ethics. Sigma Xi; The Scientific Research Society. Ethics, Values, and the Promise of Science. 1993;151-156 Forum Proceedings, Research Triangle Park, NC.