Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger nonlocality in phase space

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 022106-022101

  Van Loock, P ^a   Braunstein, Samuel L ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; PHASE SPACE METHODS; PHOTONS; QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY;

ENTANGLEMENT; NONLOCALITY;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0342555089     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.022106     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
2. A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
3. J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1964).
4. R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
5. A. Furusawa et al., Science 282, 706 (1998).
6. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
7. Z. Y. Ou, S. F. Pereira, H. J. Kimble, and K. C. Peng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3663 (1992); B. Yurke and D. Stoler, ibid. 79, 4941 (1997); A. Gilchrist, P. Deuar, and M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3169 (1998); W. J. Munro, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4197 (1999).
8. Z. Y. Ou, S. F. Pereira, H. J. Kimble, and K. C. Peng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3663 (1992); B. Yurke and D. Stoler, ibid. 79, 4941 (1997); A. Gilchrist, P. Deuar, and M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3169 (1998); W. J. Munro, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4197 (1999).
9. Z. Y. Ou, S. F. Pereira, H. J. Kimble, and K. C. Peng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3663 (1992); B. Yurke and D. Stoler, ibid. 79, 4941 (1997); A. Gilchrist, P. Deuar, and M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3169 (1998); W. J. Munro, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4197 (1999).
10. Z. Y. Ou, S. F. Pereira, H. J. Kimble, and K. C. Peng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3663 (1992); B. Yurke and D. Stoler, ibid. 79, 4941 (1997); A. Gilchrist, P. Deuar, and M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3169 (1998); W. J. Munro, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4197 (1999).
11. K. Banaszek and K. Wodkiewicz, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4345 (1998).
12. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
13. D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990).
14. N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1838 (1990).
15. D. N. Klyshko, Phys. Lett. A 172, 399 (1993); N. Gisin and H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, ibid. 246, 1 (1998).
16. D. N. Klyshko, Phys. Lett. A 172, 399 (1993); N. Gisin and H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, ibid. 246, 1 (1998).
17. P. van Loock and S. L. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3482 (2000).
18. S. L. Braunstein and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 869 (1998).
19. A. Royer, Phys. Rev. A 15, 449 (1977); H. Moya-Cessa and P. L. Knight, ibid. 48, 2479 (1993).
20. A. Royer, Phys. Rev. A 15, 449 (1977); H. Moya-Cessa and P. L. Knight, ibid. 48, 2479 (1993).
21. This choice of two equal settings leads to the same result as the choice by Banaszek and Wodkiewicz (Ref. [8]) who used opposite signs: α= √script J sign and β= - √script J sign.
22. K. Banaszek and K. Wodkiewicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2009 (1999).
23. J. W. Wu, Phys. Rev. A 61, 022111 (2000).