Non-homogeneous and multi-axial stress distribution in concrete specimens during split Hopkinson tensile tests

Computers and Structures

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 669-676

  Verleysen, Patricia ^a   Degrieck, Joris ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCRETE TESTING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; STRAIN RATE; STRESS CONCENTRATION; TENSILE STRENGTH; TENSILE TESTING; TORSION TESTING;

AXIAL STRESS; DYNAMIC TESTING; HOPKINSON BAR SET UP; UNIAXIAL STRESS;

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION;

EID: 0342520647     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00022-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. RILEM committee. The effect of impact loading on building. Matériaux et Constructions 1975;8:101-58.
2. Hopkinson B. A method of measuring the pressure in the deformation of high explosives by the impact of bullets. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond A. 213:1914;437-452.
3. Kolsky H. An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Phys Soc. B62:1949;676-700.
4. Kolsky H. Stress waves in solids. New York: Dover, 1963.
5. Davies E. A Critical study of the Hopkinson pressure bar. Philos Trans A. 240:1948;375-457.
6. Ruiz C., Mines R.A.W. The Hopkinson pressure bar: an alternative to the instrumented pendulum for Charpy tests. Int J Fracture. 29:1985;101-109.
7. Zhao H. Analyse de l'essai aux barres d'Hopkinson-Application à la mesure du comportement dynamique des matériaux. Thèse doctorale de l'Ecole nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, 1992.
8. Davies E.D.H., Hunter S.C. The dynamic compression testing of solids by the method of the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J Mech Phys Solids. 11:1963;155-179.
9. Harding J, Wood ED, Campbell JD. Tensile testing of materials at impact rates of strain. J Mech Engng Sci 1960;2:88-96.
10. Nicholas T. Tensile testing of materials at high rates of strain. Exptl Mech 1981;177-85.
11. Staab GH, Gilat A. A direct-tension split Hopkinson bar for high strain-rate testing. Exptl Mech 1991;232-5.
12. Yokoyama T, Kishida K. A novel impact three-point bend test method for determining dynamic fracture-initiation toughness. Exptl Mech 1989;188-94.
13. Martin E., Macke T., Quenisset J.M. Fracture parameters determination at yield point and fracture initiation in instrumented impact testing. Engng Fract Mech. 24(6):1986;821-836.
14. Kishimoto K, Aoki S, Sakata M. Dynamic fracture mechanics parameter estimation for three-points bend specimen in large scale yielding. Impact loading and dynamic behaviour of materials 1987;1:129-36.
15. Stevenson MG. The use of a torsional Hopkinson bar apparatus to obtain stress-strain data appropriate to high speed forming processes. International Conference on Production Technology, 19-21 August Melbourne, Australia, 1974. p. 229-37.
16. Lataillade JL, Gillaizeau F, Skhiri N, El Bounia N. Thermomechanical investigation of alumina at high strain rates. International Symposium of Intense Dynamic Loading and its Effects, June Pekin, 1986.
17. Schladerer M, Lataillade JL, Pouyet J. Conception et réalisation d'un banc de torsion dynamique pour l'étude des solides à grande vitesse de déformation. note interne (04). Laboratoire de Mécanique Physique, Université de Bordeaux I, 1981.
18. Zhao H., Gary G. On the use of SHPB techniques to determine the dynamic behavior of materials in the range of small strains. Int J Solids Struct. 33(23):1996;3363-3375.
19. Lindholm U.S. Some experiments with the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J Mech Phys Solids. 12:1964;317-335.
20. Lundberg B., Carlsson J., Sundin K.G. Analysis of elastic waves in non-uniform rods from two-points strain measurement. J Sound and Vib. 137(3):1990;483-493.
21. Gorham D.A. A numerical method for the correction of dispersion in pressure bar signals. J Phys E: Sci Instrum. 16:1983;477-479.
22. Gong J.C., Malvern L.E., Jenkins D.A. Dispersion investigation in the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J Engng Mat Tech. 112:1990;309-314.
23. Follansbee P.S., Frantz C. Wave propagation in the split hopkinson pressure bar. J Engng Mat Tech. 105:1983;61-66.
24. Lifshitz J.M., Leber H. Data processing in the split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Int J Impact Engng. 15:1994;723-733.
25. Bertholf L.D., Karnes C.H. Two-dimensional analysis of the split Hopkinson pressure bar system. J Mech Phys Solids. 23:1976;1-19.
26. Abu-Lebdeh T.M., Voyiadjis G.Z. Plasticity-damage model for concrete under cyclic multiaxial loading. J Engng Mech. 119(7):1993;1465-1484.
27. Gary G., Bailly P. Behaviour of quasi-brittle material at high strain rate. Expt Modelling Eur J Mech A/Solids. 17(3):1998;403-420.
28. Sluys LJ. Wave propagation, localization and dispersion on softening solids. PhD Thesis, TU Delft, 1992.
29. Karihaloo BL, Mai Y-W, Ripley MI, Ritchie RO. Advances in fracture research: high strain rate fracture and impact mechanics, vol. 6. Amsterdam: Pergamon Press, 1997.
30. Verleysen P. Experimentele studie en numerieke modellering van het dynamisch gedrag in trek van een al dan niet vezelversterkt quasi-bros materiaal. PhD Thesis, UG Gent, 1999.
31. Krajcinovic D. Damage mechanics. Mech Mat. 8:1989;117-197.
32. Vervuurt A., Van Mier J.G.M., Chiaia B. Damage evolution in different types of concrete by means of splitting tests. Heron. 40:1995;4.
33. SAMCEF User manual 4. Asef, stabi, dynam, repdyn. Liège: Samtech SA, 1996.
34. Hogge M., Graillet D., Ponthot J.P. Efficient implicit schemes for high-speed dynamics and crash simulation. Application to schoch-absorber devices. Proc Acomen '98. 1:1998;51-63.
35. Bathe KJ. Finite element procedures in engineering analysis. New York: Prentice Hall, 1982.
36. Meyer MA. Dynamic behaviour of materials. New York: Wiley, 1994.