Cranial defect repair using e-PTFE: Part I. Evaluation of bone stiffness

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 62-66

  Valdevit, Antonio ^a   Türegün, Murat ^b   Kambic, Helen ^a   Siemionow, Maria ^a   Zins, James ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cranial defect repair; Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e PTFE); Mechanical testing; Rabbit model; Stiffness

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; CELLS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; ORTHOPEDICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENES; POROSITY; STIFFNESS;

BONE STIFFNESS; CRANIAL DEFECTS;

GRAFTS;

POLITEF;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRENGTH; CELL MIGRATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; RABBIT; SKULL DEFECT;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; RABBITS; SKULL;

EID: 0342470955     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:1<62::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-H     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bosch C, Melsen B, Vargervik K. Guided bone regeneration in calvarial bone defects using polytetrafluoroethylene membranes. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1995;32:311-317.
2. Bartee BK, Carr JA. Evaluation of a high density polytetrafluoroethylene (n-PTFE) membrane as a barrier material to facilitate guided bone regeneration in the rat mandible. J Oral Implatol 1995;21:88-95.
3. Gray JL, Hancock EB. Guided tissue regeneration: nonabsorbable barriers. In: Dental clinics of North America, advances in periodontics, Part II. 1998;42:523-541.
4. Koempel JA, Pratt BS, O'Grady K, Wozney J, Toriumi DM. The effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on the integration of porous hydroxyapatite implants with bone. J Biomat Res (Appl Biomater) 1998;41:359-363.
5. Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Schou S, Hjørting-Hansen E. Incomplete bone regeneration of rabbit calvaria defects using different membranes. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:313-320.
6. Haider M, Holmes M. A mathematical approximation for the solution of a static indentation test. J Biomech 1997;30:747-751.
7. Sakamoto M, Li G, Hara T, Chao EYS. A new method for theoretical analysis of static indentation test. J Biomech 1996; 29:679-785.
8. Mont MA, Yoon TR, Wenz JF, Jones LC, Schlenker M, Reddi AH, Valdevit A, Elias J, Inoue N, Pacheco I, Pierre M, Jacques H, Chao EYS, Hungerford DS. Femoral head defect model: treatment with strut autografting with and without osteogenic protein-1. Trans Ortho Res Soc 1998;44:61.
9. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Paolantonio M. Bone formation inside the material interstices of e-PTFE membranes: a light microscopical and histological study in man. Biomater 1996;17: 1725-1731.
10. Doblin JM, Salkin LM, Mellado JR, Freedman AL, Stein MD. A histological evaluation of localized ridge augmentation utilizing DFDBA in combination with e-PTFE membranes and stainless steel bone pins in humans. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 1996;16:120-129.
11. Piette E, Alberius P, Samman N, Linde A. Experience with e-PTFE membrane application to bone grafting of cleft maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:327-332.
12. Grevstad HJ. Effect of subperiosteally implanted polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) material on alveolar bone in the rat. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:224-228.
13. Clowes A, Kirkman T, Reidy M. Mechanisms of arterial graft healing. AM J Pathol 1986;123:220-230.
14. Holubec H, Hunter G, Chvapil M, Chvapil T, Berhard V, Misiorowski R, Putman C. The relationship between PTFE graft ultrastructure and cellular ingrowth: the influence of an autologous jugular vein wrap. In: Kambic H and Yokobori A, editors. Biomaterials, mechanical properties. ASTM STP 1173. Philadelphia: Am Soc Test Mater; 1994, p 53-64.
15. Clark R, Boyd J, Moran J. New principles governing the tissue reactivity of prosthetic materials. J Surg Res 1974;16:510-522.
16. Hammerle S, Olah A, Lang N. Membrane permeability is unnecessary for guided generation of new bone. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:125-130.