Generating tools from graph-based specifications

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 129-139

  Jager D ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; GRAPH THEORY; HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

PROGRES PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; STRUCTURE-ORIENTED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TOOLS;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0342469003     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-5849(99)00085-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Wakeman L., Jowett J. PCTE - The Standard for Open Repositories. 1993;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2. Mowbray T.J., Ruth W.A. Inside CORBA. 1997;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
3. Scheifler R.W., Gettys J., Mento A., Converse D. X Window System: Core Library and Standards. 1996;Digital Press.
4. Reiss S. Interacting with the FIELD environment. Software Practice and Experience. 20:(S1):1990;89-115.
5. Reps T., Teitelbaum T. Synthesizer Generator: A System for Constructing Language-Based Editors. 1988;Springer, New York.
6. Bardohl R. GENGED - a generic graphical editor for visual languages based on algebraic graph grammars. Proceedings of the IEEE Symphosium on Visual Languages (VL'98), Los Alamitos CA, 1998. 1998;IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD.
7. Minas M., Viehstaedt G. DiaGen: a generator for diagram editors. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages (VL'95), Los Alamitos, CA, 1995. 1995;IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD.
8. MetaCase Consulting. MetaEdit+, Version 2.0: Method Workbench User's Guide. MetaCase Consulting, Micro Works Finland, September 1995.
9. Schürr A., Winter A., Zündorf A. Graph grammar engineering with PROGRES. Schäfer W., Botella P. Proceedings of the European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC'95) Barcelona, Spain, September 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 989:1995;219-234 Springer, Berlin.
10. Schürr A., Zündorf A. Specification of logical documents and tools. Nagl M. Building Tightly-Integrated Software Development Environments: The IPSEN Approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 1170:1996;297-324 Springer, Berlin.
11. Schürr A., Winter A., Zündorf A. The PROGRES approach: language and environment. Ehrig H., Engels G., Kreowski H.-J., Rozenberg G. Handbook on Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation: Applications, Languages, and Tools. 2:1999;487-550 World Scientific, Singapore.
12. Finkelstein A., Kramer J., Nuseibeh B. Software Process Modelling and Technology. Advanced Software Development Series. 1994;Research Studies Press (Wiley), Chichester, UK.
13. Heimann P., Krapp C.-A., Westfechtel B., Joeris G. Graph-based software process management. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 7:(4):1997;431-455.
14. Jahnke J.H., Wadsack J. Integration of analysis and redesign activities in information systems engineering. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'99), Amsterdam, 1999. 1999;IEEE Press, New York.
15. Cremer K. A tool supporting the re-design of legacy applications. Nesi P., Lehner F. Proceedings of the Second Euromicro Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering. 1998;142-148 IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD.
16. A. Radermacher, Tool support for the development of distributed applications, in: TAGT'98 - Theory and Application of Graph Transformations, technical report tr-ri-98-201, Paderborn, University Paderborn, Germany, November 1998.
17. Heimann P., Joers G., Krapp C.-A., Westfechtel B. DYNAMITE: dynamic task nets for software process management. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering, Berlin, March 1996. 1996;IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD. pp. 331-341.
18. Kiesel N., Schürr A., Westfechtel B. GRAS: a graph-oriented software engineering database system. Information Systems. 20:(1):1995;21-51.
19. A. Zündorf, A heuristic for the subgraph isomorphism problem in executing PROGRES, Technical Report AIB 93-5, Department of Computer Science III, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany, 1993.
20. A. Zündorf, Implementation of the imperative/rule based language PROGRES, Technical Report AIB 92-38, Department of Computer Science III, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany, 1992.
21. C. Friedrich, The ffGraph library, Technical Report 9520, University of Passau, Germany, 1995.
22. Ousterhout J.K. Tcl and the Tk Toolkit. 1994;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
23. Tutte W.T. How to draw a graph. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. 13:1963;743-763.
24. Brandenburg F.J. Nice drawings of graphs are computationally hard. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 439:1990;1-15.
25. Sugiyama K., Tagawa S., Toda M. Methods for visual understanding of hierarchical system structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. SMC-11:1981;109-125.
26. Eades P. heuristic for graph drawing. Congressus Numerantium. 42:1984;149-160.
27. Krasner P. A cookbook for using the model-view-controller user interface paradigm in smalltalk-80. Journal of Object-oriented Programming. 1:(3):1988;26-49.