Three-way and four-way junctions in DNA: A conformational viewpoint

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 305-316

  Altona, Cornelis ^a   Pikkemaat, Jeroen A ^a   Overmars, Franc J J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROSSING OVER; DNA CONFORMATION; DNA HELIX; DNA RECOMBINATION; MUTAGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0342419507     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80048-0     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Kowalczykowski SC, Dixon DA, Eggleston AK, Lauder SD, Rehrauer WM: Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev 1994, 58:401-465.
2. West SC: Formation, translocation and resolution of Holliday junctions during homologous genetic recombination. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 1995, 347:21-25.
3. Lilley DMJ: Homologous recombination. A ring for a warhead. Curr Biol 1994, 4:1152-1154.
4. Lilley DMJ, Clegg RM: The structure of the four-way junction in DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1993, 22:299-328.
5. Lilley DMJ, Clegg RM: The structure of branched DNA species. Q Rev Biophys 1993, 26:131-175.
6. Seeman NC, Kallenbach NR: DNA branched junctions. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1994, 23:53-86.
7. Leonard CJ, Berns KI: Adeno-associated virus type 2: a latent life cycle. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 1994, 48:29-52.
8. Lilley DMJ, Clegg RM, Diekmann S, Seeman NC, Von Kitzing E, Hagerman PJ: Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology: a nomenclature of junctions and branchpoints in nucleic acids. Recommendations 1994. Eur J Biochem 1995, 230:1-2. The authors propose a method for describing the connectivity of any branch point or junction in the secondary structure of a nucleic acid.
9. Cooper JP, Hagerman PJ: Gel electrophoretic analysis of the geometry of a DNA four-way junction. J Mol Biol 1987, 198:711-719.
10. Duckett DR, Murchie AIH, Diekmann S, Von Kitzing E, Kemper B, Lilley DMJ: The structure of the Holliday junction and its resolution. Cell 1988, 55:79-89.
11. Clegg RM, Murchie AIH, Zechel A, Carlberg C, Diekmann S, Lilley DMJ: Fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of the structure of the four-way DNA junction. Biochemistry 1992, 31:4846-4856.
12. Eis PS, Millar DP: Conformational distributions of a four-way DNA junction revealed by time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Biochemistry 1993, 32:13852-13860.
13. 2 junctions were studied in the absence and presence of magnesium ions. The relative stabilities of the folded forms, sensitivity toward magnesium concentration, and conformational selection are found to be highly sequence-dependent.
14. Welch JB, Duckett DR, Lilley DMJ: Structures of bulged three-way junctions. Nucleic Acids Res 1993, 21:4548-4555.
15. Guo Q, Lu M, Churchill MEA, Tullius TD, Kallenbach NR: Asymmetric structure of a three-arm DNA junction. Biochemistry 1990, 29:10927-10934.
16. Lu M, Guo Q, Kallenbach NR: Effect of sequence on the structure of three-arm DNA junctions. Biochemistry 1991, 30:5815-5820.
17. Zhong M, Rashes MS, Kallenbach NR: Effect of T-T base mismatches on three-arm DNA junctions. Biochemistry 1993, 32:6898-6907.
18. Shlyakhtenko LS, Rekesh D, Lindsay SM, Kutyavin I, Appella E, Harrington RE, Lyubchenko YL: Structure of three-way DNA junctions. 1. Non-planar DNA geometry. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1994, 11:1175-1189. A ligation study of tight 3H junctions is presented, showing that the angle between linear arms can be as small as 60-90°.
19. Shlyakhtenko LS, Appella E, Harrington RE, Lyubchenko YL: Structure of three-way junctions. 2. Effect of extra bases and mismatches. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1994, 12:131-143.
20. Clegg RM, Murchie AIH, Lilley DMJ: Solution structure of the four-way DNA junction at low salt conditions: a fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis. Biophys J 1994, 66:99-109. FRET efficiencies of a 4H junction under low salt conditions are incompatible with a tetrahedral structure of the unfolded form. The acute angles between neighboring arms are estimated at 69-90°, indicating either a square planar or a pyramidal arrangement.
21. Parsons CA, Stasiak A, Bennett RJ, West SC: Structure of a multisubunit complex that promotes DNA branch migration. Nature 1995, 374:375-378. On the basis of electron micrographs of tripartite RuvAB-Holliday junction complexes, a new model for catalyzed unidirectional branch migration is proposed.
22. Duckett DR, Giraud Panis M-JE, Lilley DMJ: Binding of the junction-resolving enzyme bacteriophage T7 endonuclease I to DNA: separation of binding and catalysis by mutation. J Mol Biol 1995, 246:95-107. The authors report on the interaction between mutants of T7 endonuclease I and an immobilized Holliday junction. The results show that structure-selective binding and catalysis are separate functions of the protein, and the structure of the bound form is identical with and without cations.
23. Bennett RJ, West SC: Structural analysis of the RuvC-Holliday junction complex reveals an unfolded junction. J Mol Biol 1995, 252:213-226. In the presence or absence of divalent metal ions, RuvC binds to the Holliday junction to form a complex that exhibits twofold symmetry and in which the three-dimensional structure of the 4H junction is altered into an unfolded conformation that differs from the unfolded square pyramid. The DNA at the cross-over is exposed to chemical attack.
24. Pearson CE, Zannis-Hadjopoulis M, Price GB, Zorbas H: A novel type of interaction between cruciform DNA and a cruciform binding protein from Hela cells. EMBO J 1995, 14:1571-1580. The authors report on a novel type of interaction between 4H DNA and a cruciform-binding protein from HeLa cells, an interaction that is impeded by magnesium ions; the resulting DNA structure is best described as a distorted tetrahedron and a detailed model is suggested.
25. Bhattacharyya A, Murchie AIH, Von Kitzing E, Diekmann S, Kemper B, Lilley DMJ: Model for the interaction of DNA junctions and resolving enzymes. J Mol Biol 1991, 221:1191-1207.
26. Murchie AIH, Portugal J, Lilley DMJ: Cleavage of a four-way junction by a restriction enzyme spanning the point of strand exchange. EMBO J 1991, 3:713-718.
27. Duckett DR, Murchie AIH, Giraud-Panis M-JE, Pöhler R, Lilley DMJ: Structure of the four-way DNA junction and its interaction with proteins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol 1995, 347:27-36.
28. Duckett DR, Murchie AIH, Lilley DMJ: The role of metal ions in the conformation of the four-way junction. EMBO J 1990, 9:583-590.
29. Møllegaard NE, Murchie AIH, Lilley DMJ, Nielsen PE: Uranyl photoprobing of a four-way junction: evidence for specific metal ion binding. EMBO J 1994, 7:1508-1513. Uranyl, hexamminecobalt (III), and spermidine ions (not magnesium) compete for the same high affinity binding site on the folded 4H junction. The site is located in the proximity of the exchanging backbone strands.
30. Wang Y, Mueller JE, Kemper B, Seeman NC: Assembly and characterization of five-arm and six-arm DNA branched junctions. Biochemistry 1991, 30:5667-5674.
31. Leontis NB, Kwok W, Newman JS: Stability and structure of three-way DNA junctions containing unpaired nucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res 1991, 19:759-766.
32. Kadrmas JL, Ravin AJ, Leontis NB: Relative stabilities of DNA three-way, four-way and five-way junctions (multi-helix junction loops): unpaired nucleotides can be stabilizing or destabilizing. Nucleic Acids Res 1995, 23:2212-2222. Competition binding and ultraviolet melting studies demonstrate that unpaired bases at the branch point stabilize 3H and 5H junctions but destabilize 4H compared with the stability of the parent junctions.
33. Zhong M, Rashes MS, Leontis NB, Kallenbach NR: Effects of unpaired bases on the conformation and stability of three-arm DNA junctions. Biochemistry 1994, 33:3660-3667.
34. Ladbury JE, Sturtevant JM, Leontis NB: The thermodynamics of a three-strand, DNA three-way junction complex. Biochemistry 1994, 33:6828-6833.
35. 2 conformers. The results indicate that purine-purine stacking across the junction cannot be considered as a major conformer-selective feature. Moreover, a comparison of the preferred conformation of TWJ1 with that of TWJ-TT [53•] reveals that the base sequence at the junction is not the only conformation-determining factor.
36. Rosen MA, Patel DJ: Conformational differences between bulged pyrimidines (C-C) and purines (A-A, I-I) at the branch point of three-stranded DNA junctions. Biochemistry 1993, 32:6563-6575.
37. Pieters JML, De Vroom E, Van der Marel GA, Van Boom JH, Koning TMG, Kaptein R, Altona C: Hairpin structures in DNA containing arabinofuranosyl cytidine. A combination of nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics. Biochemistry 1990, 29:788-799.
38. Ippel JH, Lanzotti V, Galeone A, Mayol L, Van den Boogaart JE, Pikkemaat JA, Altona C: Slow conformational exchange in DNA minihairpin loops. A conformational study on the circular dumbbell d. Biopolymers 1995, 36:681-694.
39. Ippel JH, Lanzotti V, Galeone A, Mayol L, Van den Boogaart JE, Pikkemaat JA, Altona C: Thermodynamics of melting of the circular dumbbell d. Stability and hydrogen bonding in the minor groove. Biopolymers 1995, 36:701-710.
40. Ippel JH, Lanzotti V, Galeone A, Mayol L, Van den Boogaart JE, Pikkemaat JA, Altona C: Conformation of the circular dumbbell d. Structure determination and molecular dynamics. J Biomol NMR 1995, 6:403-422.
41. Timsit Y, Moras D: DNA self-fitting: the double helix directs the geometry of its supramolecular assembly. EMBO J 1994, 13:2737-2746. Crystal engineering and crystal-packing analysis of oligonucleotides reveal that the sequence-dependent self-fitting of B-DNA helices is a dominant constraint for their ordered assembly. The architectural motifs could have some implications for their molecular recognition by proteins.
42. Goodsell DS, Grzeskowiak K, Dickerson RE: Crystal structure of C-T-C-T-C-G-A-G-A-G. Implications for the structure of the Holliday junction. Biochemistry 1995, 34:1022-1029. From the observation of the crossed arrangement of B-DNA helices in crystals, a new structure of the Holliday junction (model A) is proposed that is fully consistent with the available physical and footprinting data. The main difference with the earlier model [44] lies in a shift in registration so that the phosphate backbones of one helix fit snugly into the grooves of the other.
43. Srinivasan AR, Olson WK: Computer models of DNA four-way junctions. Biochemistry 1994, 33:9389-9404. A theoretical hard-sphere modelling scheme shows that sterically acceptable 4H folded junctions may cover a wide range of interhelical angles.
44. Von Kitzing E, Lilley DMJ, Diekmann S: The stereochemistry of a four-way junction: a theoretical study. Nucleic Acids Res 1990, 18:2671-2683.
45. Lu M, Guo Q, Seeman NC, Kallenbach NR: Parallel and antiparallel Holliday junctions differ in structure and stability. J Mol Biol 1991, 221:1419-1432.
46. Guo Q, Lu M, Kallenbach NR: Conformational preference and ligand binding properties of DNA junctions are determined by sequence at the branch. Biopolymers 1991, 31:359-372.
47. Pöhler JRG, Duckett DR, Lilley DMJ: Structure of four-way DNA junctions containing a nick in one strand. J Mol Biol 1994, 238:62-74. Osmium tetroxide probing and long arms-short arms gel electrophoretic mobilities show that nicked junctions display coaxial stacking in the presence of magnesium ions; the molecules fold into the conformation that locates the nick on the cross-over strand and the two stacked pairs of helices lie at an angle of approximately 90°.
48. Murchie AIH, Bowater R, Aboul-ela F, Lilley DMJ: Helix opening transitions in supercoiled DNA. Biochim Biophys Acta 1992, 1131:1-15.
49. Panyutin IG, Hsieh P: The kinetics of spontaneous branch migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:2021-2025. An improved assay was developed to determine the kinetics parameters of spontaneous branch migration as a function of temperature and ionic conditions. It appears that the structure of the branch point plays a key role in determining the rate of spontaneous branch migration.
50. Panyutin IG, Biswas I, Hsieh P: A pivotal role for the structure of the Holliday junction in DNA branch migration. EMBO J 1995, 14:1819-1826. The rate of spontaneous branch migration in mobile 4H junctions was measured as a function of magnesium ion concentration. The rate increases dramatically at ionic concentrations below 0.5 mM with the steepest acceleration occurring between 0.3 and 0.1 mM. It is concluded that coaxial base stacking constitutes a kinetic barrier to branch migration.
51. Panyutin IG, Hsieh P: Formation of a single base mismatch impedes spontaneous DNA branch migration. J Mol Biol 1993, 230:413-424.
52. Carlström G, Chen S-m, Miick S, Chazin WJ: NMR studies of complex DNA structures: the Holliday intermediate in genetic recombination. Methods Enzymol 1995, 261:163-182. The authors present a full account of the experimental NMR techniques and resonance assignment strategies which were employed in the analysis of the conformational problems of 4H junction J2P1.
53. 2 junctions having either unpaired TT or TC on one strand reveal a coaxial stacking preference that differs from the one found in [36] and in [35••]; thus far, this remains the only example of an A/C stacking arrangement (in the present nomenclature) studied by NMR.
54. Ouporov IV, Leontis NB: Refinement of the solution structure of a branched DNA three-way junction. Biophys J 1995, 68:266-274.
55. Rosen MA, Patel DJ: Structural features of a three-stranded DNA junction containing a C-C functional bulge. Biochemistry 1993, 32:6576-6587.
56. Altona C, Pikkemaat JA: Construction of a DNA four-way junction: design and NMR spectroscopy. In Modelling of Biomolecular Structures and Mechanisms. Edited by Pullman B, Jortner J. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995:289-304. The authors supply the first description of a small 4H model junction that consists of a self-folding linear 46-mer DNA strand.
57. 1H NMR studies of immobile Holliday junctions: nonlabile proton assignments and identification of cross-over isomers. Biochemistry 1994, 33:11453-11459. This is the final report on NMR studies of two 32-base-pair models of the Holliday junction, J1 and J2. The overlap of resonances in proton NOESY spectra necessitated the use of a multipathway strategy for obtaining sequence-specific assignments, wherein all possible NOE connectivities are analyzed in parallel. Several unambiguous cross-arm NOE connectivities were identified, directly establishing the stacking arrangement of each contiguous (two-arm) helical domain. J2 differs from J1 by the exchange of two base pairs in neighbouring arms and this exchange results in a different conformer selection.
58. 1H NMR studies of 32-base-pair synthetic immobile Holliday junctions: complete assignment of the labile protons and identification of the base-pairing scheme. Biochemistry 1993, 32:319-326.
59. Pikkemaat JA, Van den Elst H, Van Boom JH, Altona C: NMR studies and conformational analysis of a DNA four-way junction formed in a linear synthetic oligonucleotide. Biochemistry 1994, 33:14896-14907. The design of a 46-mer model Holliday junction, described in [56•], was studied by means of proton NMR. The data confirm the expected existence of minihairpin loop structures at the three 5′-CTTG-3′ motifs in the sequence. Watson-Crick type base pairing is preserved for all residues in the stem domain, including the residues at the centre of the junction. The relatively large number of identified NOE contacts at the branch point indicates that quasi-continuous stacking occurs at the interface between arms A and D and at the interface between arms B and C (A/D stack).
60. 1H-detected experiments point to the coexistence of a minor amount of the second conformer in equilibrium with the major form and provide a direct measure of the equilibrium distribution.
61. 1H NMR studies of synthetic immobile Holliday junctions. Biochemistry 1991, 30:766-771.
62. Wemmer DE, Wand AJ, Seeman NC, Kallenbach NR: NMR analysis of DNA junctions. Biochemistry 1985, 24:5745-5749.
63. Macke T, Chen S-M, Chazin WJ: Analysis of the structure and dynamics of synthetic 32 base-pair models of the Holliday junction intermediate in genetic recombination. In Structure and Function Volume 1: Nucleic Acids. Edited by Sarma RH, Sarma MH. Schenectady: Adenine Press; 1992:213-227.
64. 2+ (between the same arms as in their DNA analogues). However, the two continuous helical axes are approximately at right angles to each other. The RNA junctions exhibit significant sequence-dependent differences in their structures as a function of ionic conditions.
65. -1) at 4°C. It is concluded that large cross-over preferences are not characteristic of junctions with extensive symmetry, and are thus unlikely to have important consequences for genetic recombination.
66. Pieters JML, Mans RMW, Van den Elst H, Van der Marel GA, Van Boom JH, Altona C: Conformation and thermodynamic consequences of the introduction of a nick in duplexed DNA fragments: an NMR study augmented by biochemical experiments. Nucleic Acids Res 1989, 17:4551-4565.
67. Zhong M, Kallenbach NR: Conformation and thermodynamics of DNA necks. Models for three-arm branch formation in a duplex. J Mol Biol 1993, 230:766-778.