Verifying a fissile material production cut-off treaty

Nonproliferation Review

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 97-107

  Bragin, Victor ^a   Carlson, John ^a   Hill, John ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0342354470     PISSN: 10736700     EISSN: 17461766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10736709808436739     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Report of the Canberra Commission on the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons (Canberra: National Capital Printers, 1996).
2. John B. Campbell, “Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty: Australian Views,” statement delivered by the Head of the Australian Delegation to the Second Preparatory Committee of the 2000 Review Conference of the States Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Geneva, April 30, 1998.
3. For the latest discussions of FMCT issues, see the proceedings of the “Seminar Conference on the Technical Issues of a FMCT,” Geneva, May 11-12, 1998, and papers presented at the Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty seminar, organized by Sweden’s Defence Research Establishment (FOA), Hasseludden, Sweden, June 3-5, 1998.
4. General Assembly Resolution: Prohibition of the Production of Fissile Material for Nuclear Weapons and Other Nuclear Explosive Devices, U.N. General Assembly document RES/48/75L, December 16, 1993.
5. Review and Extension Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Final Document: Part 1: Organization and Work of the Conference, New York, 1995, Document No. NPT/CONF.1995/32/Decision 2, “Principles and Objectives for Nuclear Non Proliferation and Disarmament”
6. Katherine L. Starr, “The Why and Whither of Fissile Material Cutoff,” Report of a Conference at Schlagenbad, Germany, July 25-27, 1997.
7. George A. MacLean, “Taking Stocks: Fissile Materials Stockpiles and Proposed Cutoff Treaty,” in Non-Proliferation Agreements, Arrangements and Responses: Proceedings of the 1996 Canadian Non-Proliferation Workshop (Toronto: Centre for International and Security Studies, 1997).
8. IAEA Information Circular: Communications Receivedfrom Certain Member Stales Concerning Their Policies Regarding the Management of Plutonium, IAEA document INFCIRC/549, Vienna, March 16, 1998.
9. IAEA, “A Cut-Off Treaty and Associated Costs: An IAEA Secretariat Working Paper on Different Alternatives for the Verification of a Fissile Material Production Cut-Off Treaty and Preliminary Cost Estimates Required for the Verification of these Alternatives,” paper presented at the Workshop on a Cut-Off Treaty, Toronto, Canada, January 17-18, 1995.
10. Thomas B. Cochran and Christopher E. Paine, The Amount of Plutonium and Highly-Enriched Uranium Needed for Pure Fission Nuclear Weapons (Washington, D.C.: Natural Resources Defense Council, Revised April 13, 1995).
11. Bruno Pellaud, “International Verification of U.S. and Russian Materials Released for Storage and Disposition,” paper presented at the International Policy Forum: Management & Disposition of Nuclear Weapons Materials, Landsdowne, Virginia, February 12, 1997.