Trading costs, investor recognition and market response: An analysis of firms that move from the Amex (Nasdaq) to Nasdaq (Amex)

Journal of Banking and Finance

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 63-83

  Tse, Yiuman ^a   Devos, Erik ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Change of listing location; Investor recognition; Market response; Trading costs

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242721054     PISSN: 03784266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00398-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aggarwal, R., Angel, J.J., 1998. Optimal listing policy: Why Microsoft and Intel do not list on the NYSE. Working paper, Georgetown University
2. Atkins A. Dyl E. Market structure and reported trading volume: Nasdaq versus the NYSE Journal of Financial Research 20 1997 291-304
3. Baker H.K. Powell G.E. Weaver D.G. Does NYSE listing affect firm visibility? Financial Management 28 1999 46-54
4. Barclay M. Bid-ask spreads and the avoidance of odd-eighth quotes on Nasdaq: An examination of exchange listings Journal of Financial Economics 45 1997 35-60
5. Barclay M. Kandel E. Marx L.M. The effects of transaction costs on stock prices and trading volume Journal of Financial Intermediation 7 1998 130-150
6. Barclay M. Christie W. Harris J. Kandel E. Schultz P. The effects of market reform on the trading costs and depths of Nasdaq stocks Journal of Finance 54 1999 1-34
7. Bessembinder H. The degree of price resolution ad equity trading costs Journal of Financial Economics 45 1997 9-34
8. Bessembinder H. Trade execution costs on Nasdaq and the NYSE: A post-reform comparison Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 34 1999 387-408
9. Bessembinder H. Kaufman H. A comparison of trade execution costs for NYSE and Nasdaq listed stocks Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 32 1997 287-310
10. Bessembinder, H., Rath, S., 2002. Trading costs and return volatility: Evidence from exchange listings. Working paper, University of Utah
11. Chandra, U., Wasley, C., Waymire, G., 1999, Share price responses to technology firms' negative quarterly earnings surprises. Working paper, University of Kentucky
12. Christie W.G. Huang R. Market structures and liquidity: A transactions data study of exchange listings Journal of Financial Intermediation 3 1994 300-326
13. Christie W.G. Schultz P.H. Why do NASDAQ market makers avoid odd-eighth quotes? Journal of Finance 49 1994 1813-1840
14. Chung, K.H., Van Ness, B.F., Van Ness, R.A., 1999. Spreads, depths, and quote clustering on the NYSE and Nasdaq: Evidence after the 1997 SEC rule changes. Working paper, SUNY at Buffalo
15. Chung K.H. Van Ness B.F. Van Ness R.A. Can the treatment of limit orders reconcile the differences in trading costs between NYSE and Nasdaq issues? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36 2001 267-286
16. Clyde P. Schultz P.H. Zaman M. Trading costs and exchange delisting: The case of firms that voluntarily move from the American stock exchange to the Nasdaq Journal of Finance 52 1997 2103-2112
17. Cowan A.R. Carter R.B. Dark F.H. Singh A.K. Explaining the NYSE listing choices of NASDAQ Firms Financial Management 21 1992 73-86
18. Demsetz H. Limit orders and the alleged Nasdaq collusion Journal of Financial Economics 35 1997 91-95
19. Dutta P. Madhavan A. Competition and collusion in dealer markets Journal of Finance 52 1997 245-276
20. Elyasiani E. Hauser S. Lauterbach B. Market response to liquidity improvements: Evidence from exchange listings Financial Review 41 2000 1-14
21. Garman M. Klass M. On the estimation of security price volatilities from historical data Journal of Business 53 1980 67-78
22. Grossman S.J. Miller M.H. Cone K.R. Fischel D.R. Clustering and competition in asset markets Journal of Law and Economics 15 1997 23-60
23. Harris L. Stock price clustering and discreteness Review of Financial Studies 4 1991 389-415
24. Huang R. Stoll H. Tick size, bid-ask spreads and market structure Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36 2001 503-522
25. Kadlec G. McConnell J. The effect of market segmentation and illiquidity on asset prices: Evidence from exchange listings Journal of Finance 49 1994 611-636
26. Kalay A. Portniaguina E. Swimming against the tides: The case of Aeroflex move from NYSE to Nasdaq Journal of Financial Markets 4 2001 261-267
27. Lee C. Ready M. Inferring trade direction from intraday data Journal of Finance 46 1991 733-746
28. Merton R.C. Presidential address: A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information Journal of Finance 42 1987 483-510
29. Nasdaq Publication, 2000, Working for You. The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc
30. Pruitt, S.W., Van Ness, B.F., Van Ness, R.A., 2002. The first of many? The microstructure effects of Aerofles corporation's jump from NYSE to the Nasdaq. Working paper, Kansas State University
31. Ronen, T., Weaver, D.G., 1998. The effect of tick size on volatility, trader behavior, and market quality. Working paper, Rutgers University and Baruch College, New York
32. Ronen T. Weaver D.G. 'Teenies' anyone? Journal of Financial Markets 4 2001 231-260
33. Sanger G. McConnell J. Stock exchange listings, firm value, and security market efficiency: The impact of Nasdaq Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21 1986 1-25
34. Smith, J.W., 1998. The effects of order handling rules and 16ths on Nasdaq: A cross-sectional analysis. NADS Working Paper 98-02
35. Smith, J.W., Selway J.P. III, McCormick, D.T., 1998. The Nasdaq stock market: Historical background and current operation. NASD Working Paper 98-01
36. The Wall Street Journal 2001. Deals and Deals Makers, February 2001
37. The Washington Post 1999. NYSE Delisting Rule Eased; SEC Action Faces Challenge From Rival NASD, July 23