Can paediatric radiologists resist RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours)?

Pediatric Radiology

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 739-743

  McHugh, Kleran ^a   Kao, Simon ^b  

^a Radiology Department   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

(3 IODOBENZYL)GUANIDINE; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; IMATINIB;

ACCURACY; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CHILD; CHILDHOOD CANCER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; EDITORIAL; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; METASTASIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ONCOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; PEDIATRICS; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGIST; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOLID TUMOR; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; VOLUMETRY; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

CHILD; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASMS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 0242720862     PISSN: 03010449     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-003-1067-6     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer EA, et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumours. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205-216
2. World Health Organization (1979) WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. WHO, Geneva
3. Tsuchida Y, Therasse P (2001) Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST): new guidelines. Med Pediatr Oncol 37:1-3
4. James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, et al (1999) Measuring response in solid tumours: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:523-528
5. Padhani AR (2001) The RECIST criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol 74:983-986
6. Spears CP (1984) Volume doubling measurement of spherical and ellipsoidal tumours. Med Pediatr Oncol 12:212-217
7. Kao SC, Strabala NM, Berbaum KS, et al (2001) CT volume estimation of primary abdominal tumours using ellipsoid model in children. Pediatr Radiol 31 (Suppl 1):S26-S27
8. Gehan EA, Tefft MC (2000) Will there be resistance to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours)? J Natl Cancer Inst 92:179-181
9. Kimura M, Tominaga T (2002) Outstanding problems with Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 9:153-159
10. Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700-706
11. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289-296
12. Yoshida S, Yoshinori M, Atsushi O, et al (2000) Significance of and problems in adopting response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) for assessing anticancer effects of advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 3:128-133
13. Kao SC, Hadley WL (2002) The effects of using various size measurement methods in tumor response categorization. Pediatr Radiol 32 (Suppl 1):S68
14. Saini S (2001) Radiologic measurement of tumor size in clinical trials: past, present, and future. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:333-334
15. Anderson J, Slater O, McHugh K, et al (2002) Response without shrinkage in bilateral Wilms' tumour: significance of rhabdomyomatous histology. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 24:31-34
16. Padhani AR, Husband JE (2000) Are current tumour response criteria relevant for the 21st century? Br J Radiol 73:1031-1033
17. Smith TA (1998) FDG uptake, tumour characteristics and response to therapy: a review. Nucl Med Commun 19:97-105