Quote-based competition and trade execution costs in NYSE-listed stocks

Journal of Financial Economics

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 385-422

  Bessembinder, Hendrik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition for order flow; Quotation strategies; Trading costs

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242720182     PISSN: 0304405X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00168-5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amihud Y. Mendelson H. Dealership market: market making with inventory Journal of Financial Economics 8 1980 31-53
2. Battalio R. Third market broker-dealers: cost competitors or cream-skimmers? An empirical analysis Journal of Finance 52 1997 341-352
3. Battalio R. Greene J. Jennings R. Do competing specialists and preferencing dealers affect market quality? Review of Financial Studies 10 1997 969-993
4. Bessembinder H. Issues in assessing trade execution costs Journal of Financial Markets 6 2003 233-257
5. Bessembinder H. Kaufman H. A cross-exchange comparison of execution costs and information flow for NYSE-listed stocks Journal of Financial Economics 46 1997 293-319
6. Bloomfield R. O'Hara M. Does order preferencing matter? Journal of Financial Economics 50 1998 3-37
7. Blume, M., 2001. The structure of the US equity markets?. Working paper, the Wharton School.
8. Blume M. Goldstein M. Quotes, order flow, and price discovery Journal of Finance 52 1997 221-244
9. Chung K. Van Ness B. Van Ness R. Limit orders and the bid-ask spread Journal of Financial Economics 53 1999 255-287
10. Chung, K., Chuwonganant C., McCormick, T., 2001. Order preferencing, spreads, and dealer market share on Nasdaq: evidence before and after decimalization. Working paper, State University of New York at Buffalo.
11. Dutta P. Madhavan A. Competition and collusion in dealer markets Journal of Finance 52 1997 245-276
12. Easley D. Kiefer N. O'Hara M. Cream skimming or profit sharing? The curious role of purchased order flow Journal of Finance 51 1996 811-834
13. Ellis K. Michaely R. O'Hara M. The accuracy of trade classification rules: evidence from Nasdaq Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35 2000 529-552
14. Ferrell, A., 2000. The allocation of investors' orders and inefficient market competition: a proposal. Working paper, Harvard Law School.
15. Hansch O. Naik N. Viswanathan S. Do inventories matter in dealership markets: evidence from the London stock exchange Journal of Finance 53 1998 1623-1656
16. Harris L. Consolidation, fragmentation, segmentation, and regulation Financial Markets, Institutions, and Instruments 2 1993 3-28
17. Hasbrouck, J., Sofianos, G., Sosobee, D. 1993. New York Stock Exchange systems and trading procedures. NYSE Working paper 93-01.
18. Ho T. Stoll H. The dynamics of dealer markets under competition Journal of Finance 38 1983 1053-1074
19. Huang R. Stoll H. Dealer versus auction markets: a paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE Journal of Financial Economics 41 1996 313-358
20. Lee C. Market integration and price execution for NYSE-listed securities Journal of Finance 48 1993 1009-1038
21. Lee C. Ready M. Inferring trade direction from intraday data Journal of Finance 46 1991 733-746
22. Macey J. O'Hara M. The law and economics of best execution Journal of Financial Intermediation 6 1997 3-19
23. Madhavan A. Sofianos G. An empirical analysis of NYSE specialist trading Journal of Financial Economics 48 1998 189-210
24. Parlour C. Rajan U. Payment for order flow Journal of Financial Economics 68 2003 379-411
25. Petersen M. Fialkowski D. Posted versus effective spreads Journal of Financial Economics 35 1994 269-292
26. Smith, J., Selway, J., McCormick, T., 1998. The Nasdaq Stock Market: Historical Background and Current Operation. NASD Working Paper 98-01, National Association of Securities Dealers, Washington, DC.
27. Stoll H. Market fragmentation Financial Analysts Journal 57 2001 16-20
28. United States Securities and Exchange Commission (US SEC), 2000. NYSE rulemaking: notice of filing of proposed rule change to rescind exchange rule 390; commission request for comment on issues relating to market fragmentation, release No. 34-42450, Washington, DC