Dynamic access control: Preserving safety and trust for network defense operations

Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (SACMAT 2002)

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 231-237

  Naldurg, Prasad ^a   Campbell, Roy H ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Access lists; Capability lists; Comparison; Dynamic access control; Safety; Trust

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT;

ACCESS LISTS; CAPABILITY LISTS; DYNAMIC ACCESS CONTROL;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 0242709310     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. E. Bertino, B. Catania, E. Ferrari, and P. Perlasca. A logical framework for reasoning about access control models. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Symposium on Access control models and technologies, May 2001.
2. M. Bishop. Computer Security: Art and Science. Addison-Wesley, 2003.
3. M. Blaze, J. Feigenbaum, and A. D. Keromytis. KeyNote: Trust management for public-key infrastructures. In Security Protocols International Workshop, Cambridge, England, 1998.
4. R. H. Campbell, Z. Liu, M. D. Mickunas, P. Naldurg, and S. Yi. Seraphim: dynamic interoperable security architecture for active networks. In OPENARCH 2000, Tel-Aviv, Israel, March 26-27, 2000.
5. A. Chander, D. Dean, and J. Mitchell. A state-transition model of trust management and access control. In 14th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, June 2001.
6. D. Denning. Cryptography and Data Security. Addison-Wesley, 1982.
7. E. Dijkstra. Guarded commands, nondeterminacy, and formal derivation of programs. Communications of the ACM, 18(8):453-457, 1975.
8. D. F. Ferraiolo and D. R. Kuhn. Role-based access controls. In In Proceedings of the 15th NIST-NSA National Computer Security Conference, Baltimore, MD, Oct, 1992.
9. S. Jajodia, P. Samarati, V. S. Subrahmanian, and E. Bertino. A unified framework for enforcing multiple access control policies. In In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, volume 26,2 of SIGMOD Record, pages 474-485, 1997.
10. P. Karger and A. Herbert. An augmented capability architecture to support lattice security and traceability of access. In Proceedings of the 1984 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 2-12, 1984.
11. M. Koch, L. V. Mancini, and F. Parisi-Presicce. On the specification and evolution of access control policies. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Symposium on Access control models and technologies, May 2001.
12. S. Mullender. Distributed Systems, Second Edition. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
13. P. Naldurg, R. Campbell, and M. D. Mickunas. Developing dynamic security policies. In Proceedings of the 2002 DARPA Active Networks Conference and Exposition (DANCE 2002), San Francisco, CA, USA, IEEE Computer Society Press, May 29-31, 2002.
14. G. Sampemane, P. Naldurg, and R. Campbell. Access control for active spaces. In Proceedings of 18th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC), 2002.
15. R. S. Sandhu and E. J. Coyne. Role-based access control models. IEEE Computer, 29(2), Feb. 1996.
16. F. Schneider. Enforceable security policies. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 3(1):30-50, 2000.
17. S. Weeks. Understanding trust management systems. In 2001 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May 2001.