Improving TCP performance over mobile ad-hoc networks with out-of-order detection and response

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc)

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 217-225

  Wang, Feng ^a   Zhang, Yongguang ^a,b  

^a University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b Hughes Aircraft Co   (United States)

Author keywords

MANET; Mobile ad hoc networks; Out of order; TCP

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PACKET SWITCHING; SIGNAL DETECTION; TELECOMMUNICATION LINKS; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

LINK FAILURES; MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS; OUT OF ORDER DETECTION; PACKET LOSSES;

MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 0242696190     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/513824.513827     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. H. Balakrishnan and R. Katz. Explicit loss notification and wireless web performance. In Proceedings of IEEE Globecom - Internet Mini-Conference, Sidney, Australia, Nov. 1998.
2. H. Balakrishnan, V. Padmanabhan, S. Seshan, and R. Katz. A comparison of mechanisms for improving TCP performance over wireless links. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM'96, Stanford, California, Aug. 1996.
3. L. Breslau, et al. Advances in network simulation. IEEE Computer, 33(5):59-67, May 2000.
4. K. Chandran, S. Raghunathan, S. Venkatesan, and R. Prakash, A feedback-based scheme for improving TCP performance in ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 8(1):34-39, Feb. 2001.
5. CMU Monarch Group. CMU monarch extensions to the NS-2 simulator. URL: http://monarch.cs.cmu.edu/cmu-ns.html.
6. T. Dyer and R. Boppana. A comparison of TCP performance over three routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing (MobiHoc'01), Long Beach, California, Oct. 2001.
7. S. Floyd. TCP and explicit congestion notification. ACM Computer Communication Review, 24(5):8-23 Oct. 1994.
8. S. Floyd. Re: TCP and out-of-order delivery. Message ID <199902030027.QAA06775@owl.ee.lbl.gov> to the end-to-end-interest mailing list, Feb. 1999.
9. G. Holland and N. Vaidya. Analysis of TCP performance over mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom'99, Seattle, Washington, Aug. 1999.
10. V. Jacobson, Congestion avoidance and control. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM'88, Stanford, California, Aug. 1988.
11. V. Jacobson, R. Braden, and D. Borman. TCP extensions for high performance. IETF RFC 1323, May 1992.
12. D. Johnson, D. Maltz, Y.-C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva. The dynamic source routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks (DSR). IETF Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-manet-dsr-06.txt, work in progress, Nov. 2001.
13. J. Liu and S. Singh. ATCP: TCP for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 19(7):1300-1315, July 2001.
14. M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi, S. Floyd, and A. Romanow. TCP selective acknowledgement options. IETF RFC 2018, Oct. 1996.
15. C. Perkins and E. Royer. Ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pages 90-100, New Orleans, LA, Feb. 1999.