Dual Prism Adaptation: Calibration or Alignment?

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 399-408

  Redding, Gordon M ^a   Wallace, Benjamin ^b  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Calibration; Conditional adaptation; Motor control; Prism adaptation

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; MOTOR CONTROL; PRISM; REVIEW; SENSORY STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ADAPTATION; WORK;

EID: 0242693394     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222890309603159     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Abbs, J. H., Gracco, V. L., & Cole, K. J. (1984). Control of multimovement coordination: Sensorimotor mechanisms in speech motor programming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 195-231.
2. Abbs, J. H., & Winstein, C. J. (1990). Functional contributions of rapid and automatic sensory-based adjustments to motor output. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 627-652). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Abend, W. M., Bizzi, E., & Morasso, P. (1982). Human arm trajectory formation. Brain, 105, 331-348.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychological Review, 94, 192-210.
5. Bard, C., Fleury, M., Teasdale, N., Paillard, J., & Nougier, V. (1995). Contribution of proprioception for calibrating and updating the motor space. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 73(2), 246-254.
6. Bedford, F. L. (1989). Constraints on learning new mapping between perceptual dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 232-248.
7. Bedford, F. L. (1993a). Perceptual and cognitive spatial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 517-530.
8. Bedford, F. L. (1993b). Perceptual learning. In D. Medin (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 30, pp. 1-60). New York: Academic Press.
9. Bedford, F. L. (1994). A pair of paradoxes and the perceptual pairing process. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 60-68.
10. Bedford, F. L. (2001). Towards a general law of numerical/object identity. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 20(3-4), 113-176.
11. Bingham, G. P., & Romack, J. L. (1999). The rate of adaptation to displacement prisms remains constant despite acquisition of rapid calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(5), 1331-1346.
12. Bock, O., Schneider, S., & Bloomberg, J. J. (2001). Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation. Experimental Brain Research, 138, 359-365.
13. Bowditch, H. P., & Southard, W. F. (1880). A comparison of sight and touch. Journal of Physiology, 3, 232-245.
14. Carroll, J. D. (1963). Function learning: The learning of continuous functional mapping relating stimulus and response continua (Rep. No. RB-63-26). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
15. Clower, D. M., & Boussaoud, D. (2000). Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84(5), 2703-2708.
16. Craske, B. (1975). A current view of the processes and mechanisms of prism adaptation. Les Colloques de l'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, 43, 125-138.
17. Cunningham, H. A., & Welch, R. B. (1994). Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: Implications for models of adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 987-999.
18. Desmurget, M., Rossetti, Y., Jordan, M., Meckler, C., & Prablanc, C. (1997). Viewing the hand prior to movement improves accuracy of pointing performed toward the unseen contralateral hand. Experimental Brain Research, 115, 180-186.
19. Desmurget, M., Rossetti, Y., Prablanc, C., Stelmach, G. E., & Jeannerod, M. (1995). Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 73, 262-272.
20. Fernández-Ruiz, J., Hall-Haro, C., Díaz, R., Mischner, J., Vergara, P., & Lopez-Garcia, J. C. (2000). Learning motor synergies makes use of information on muscular load. Learning and Memory, 7(4), 193-198.
21. Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 1688-1703.
22. Flook, J. P., & McGonigle, B. O. (1977). Serial adaptation to conflicting prismatic rearrangement effects in monkey and man. Perception, 6, 15-29.
23. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
24. Gibson, E. J. (1984). Perceptual development from the ecological approach. In M. E. Lamb, A. L. Brown, & B. Rogoff (Eds.), Advances in developmental psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 243-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Greene, P. H. (1972). Problems of organization of motor systems. In R. Rosen & F. M. Snell (Eds.), Progress in theoretical biology (Vol. 2, pp. 303-338). New York: Academic Press.
26. Grossberg, S., & Kuperstein, M. (1989). Neural dynamics of adaptive sensory-motor control: Expanded edition. New York: Pergamon Press.
27. Guigon, E., & Baraduc, P. (2002). A neural model of perceptual-motor alignment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(1), 538-549.
28. Hay, J. C., & Pick, H. L., Jr. (1966b). Visual and proprioceptive adaptation to optical displacement of the visual stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 150-158.
29. Houk, J. C., & Rymer, W. Z. (1981). Neural control of muscle length and tension. In V. B. Brooks (Ed.), Handbook of physiology. Sec. 1. The nervous system. Vol. 2. Motor control. Pt. 1 (pp. 257-323). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
30. Howard, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley
31. Jackendoff, R., & Landau, B. (1994). What is coded in parietal representations? Behavioral and Brain Sciences (Commentary), 17, 211-212.
32. Jordan, M. I. (1990). Motor learning and the degrees of freedom problem. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 796-836). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
33. Koh, K., & Meyer, D. E. (1989, August). Induction of continuous stimulus-response relations. In G. Olson & E. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 333-340). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Koh, K., & Meyer, D. E. (1991). Function learning: Induction of continuous stimulus-response relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 811-836.
35. Kravitz, J. H. (1972). Conditioned adaptation to prismatic displacement. Perception and Psychophysics, 11, 38-42.
36. Kravitz, J. H., & Yaffe, F. (1972). Conditioned adaptation to prismatic displacement with a tone as the conditional stimulus. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 305-308.
37. Lazar, G., & Van Laer, J. (1968). Adaptation to displaced vision after experience with lesser displacements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 579-582.
38. Luria, S. M., & Kinney, J. A. S. (1970). Underwater vision. Science, 167, 1454-1461.
39. Luria, S. M., Kinney, J. A. S., & Weissman, S. (1967). Estimates of size and distance underwater. American Journal of Psychology, 80, 282-286.
40. Marteniuk, R. G. (1992). Issues in goal directed motor learning: Feedforward control, motor equivalence, specificity, and artificial neural networks. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II (pp. 101-124). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
41. Martin, T. A., Keating, J. G., Goodkin, H. P., Bastian, A. J., & Thach, W. T. (1996). Throwing while looking through prisms II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. Brain, 119, 1199-1211.
42. Masson, M. E. J. (1991). Cognitive theories of skill acquisition. In R. B. Wilberg (Ed.), The learning, memory, and perception of perceptual-motor skills (pp. 15-33). Amsterdam: North-Holland. (Original work published 1990)
43. McGonigle, B. O., & Flook, J. P. (1978). Long-term retention of single and multistate prismatic adaptation in humans. Nature, 272, 354-366.
44. Morasso, P. (1981). Spatial control of arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 42, 223-227.
45. Pick, H. L., Jr., & Hay, J. C. (1966). Gaze-contingent adaptation to prismatic spectacles. American Journal of Psychology, 79, 443-450.
46. Pick, H. L., Jr., Hay, J. C., & Martin, R. (1969). Adaptation to split-field wedge prism spectacles. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 125-132.
47. Pick, H. L., Jr., Rieser, J. J., Wagner, D., & Garing, A. E. (1999). The recalibration of rotational locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(5), 1179-1188.
48. Proteau, L. (1992). On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 67-103). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
49. Radeau, M. (1994). Auditory-visual spatial interaction and modularity. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 3-51.
50. Redding, G. M. (2001). On the sufficiency of object identity. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 20(3-4), 243-248.
51. Redding, G. M., Clark, S. E., & Wallace, B. (1985). Attention and prism adaptation. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 1-25.
52. Redding, G. M., Rader, S. D., & Lucas, D. R. (1992). Cognitive load and prism adaptation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 238-246.
53. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1976). Components of displacement adaptation in acquisition and decay as a function of hand and hall exposure. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 453-459.
54. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1978). Sources of " overadditivity" in prism adaptation. Perception and Psychophysics, 24, 58-62.
55. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1985a). Cognitive interference in prism adaptation. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 225-230.
56. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1985b). Perceptual-motor coordination and adaptation during locomotion: Determinants of prism adaptation in hall exposure. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 320-330.
57. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1988a). Components of prism adaptation in terminal and concurrent exposure: Organization of the eye-hand coordination loop. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 59-68.
58. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1988b). Head posture effects in prism adaptation during hallway exposure. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 69-75.
59. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1990). Effects on prism adaptation of duration and timing of visual feedback during pointing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 209-224.
60. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1992). Effects of pointing rate and availability of visual feedback on visual and proprioceptive components of prism adaptation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 226-237.
61. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1993). Adaptive coordination and alignment of eye and hand. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 75-88.
62. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1994). Effects of movement duration and visual feedback on visual and proprioceptive components of prism adaptation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 257-266.
63. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1996). Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 379-394.
64. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1997a). Adaptive spatial alignment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Redding G. M., & Wallace, B. (1997b). Prism adaptation during target pointing from visible and nonvisible starting locations. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 119-130.
66. Redding G. M., & Wallace, B. (1998). Phenomenal versus process explanations of prism aftereffects. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 44-50.
67. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (2000). Prism exposure aftereffects and direct effects for different movement and feedback times. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 83-99.
68. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (2001). Calibration and alignment are separable: Evidence from prism adaptation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33(4), 401-412.
69. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (2002). Strategic calibration and spatial alignment: A model from prism adaptation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34(2), 126-138.
70. Rieser, J. J., Pick, H. L., Jr., Ashmead, D. H., & Garing, A. E. (1995). Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 480-497.
71. Roller, C. A., Cohen, H. S., Kimball, K. T., & Bloomberg, J. (2001). Variable practice with lenses improves visuo-motor plasticity. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 341-352.
72. Rozin, P., & Schull, J. (1988). The adaptive-evolutionary point of view in experimental psychology. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 1. Perception and motivation (pp. 503-546). New York: Wiley.
73. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
74. Schmidt, R. A. (1987). The acquisition of skill: Some modifications to the perception-action relationship through practice. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 77-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
76. Shadmehr, R., & Brashers-Krug, T. (1997). Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 409-419.
77. Shadmehr, R., & Holcomb, H. H. (1999). Inhibitory control of competing motor memories. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 235-251.
78. Shepard, R. N. (1981). Psychophysical complementarity. In M. Kobovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds,), Perceptual organization (pp. 279-341). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Soechting, J. F. (1989). Elements of coordinated arm movements in three-dimensional space. In S. A. Wallace (Ed.), Perspectives on the coordination of movement (pp. 47-83). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
80. Uhlarik, J. J., & Canon, L. K. (1970). Effects of situational cues on prism-induced aftereffects. Perception and Psychophysics, 7, 348-350.
81. Uhlarik, J. J., & Canon, L. K. (1971). Influence of concurrent and terminal exposure conditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 233-239.
82. Wallace, B., & Garrett, J. B. (1975). Perceptual adaptation with selective reductions of felt sensation. Perception, 4, 437-445.
83. Wallace, B., & Redding, G. M. (1979). Additivity in prism adaptation as manifested in intermanual and interocular transfer. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 133-136.
84. Welch, R. B. (1971). Discriminative conditioning of prism adaptation. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 90-92.
85. Welch, R. B. (1978). Perceptual modification: Adapting to altered sensory environments. New York: Academic Press.
86. Welch, R. B., Bridgeman, B., Anand, S., & Browman, K. E. (1993). Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 195-204.
87. Welch, R. B., Choe, C. S., & Heinrich, D. R. (1974). Evidence for a three-component model of prism adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 700-705.
88. Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638-667.
89. Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H (1986). Intersensory interactions. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. R. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. 1: Sensory processes and perception (pp. 25.1-25.36). New York: Wiley.
90. Wilkinson, D. A. (1971). Visual-motor control loop: A linear system? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 250-257.