Visualization trends: Applications in the operating room

Seminars in Laparoscopic Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 107-114

  Seales, W Brent ^a   Caban, Jesus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CAMERA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATING ROOM; SENSOR; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 0242690986     PISSN: 10715517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107155170301000303     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Benbasat I, Todd PA: An experimental investigation of interface design alternatives: Icon vs. text and direct manipulation vs. menus. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38(3):369-402, 1993.
2. van Dam A: Post-WIMP user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 40(2):1997.
3. Durrani AF, Preminger GM: Three-dimensional video imaging for endoscope surgery. Comput Biol Med 25(2):237-247, 1995.
4. Sandberg W, Ganous T, Steiner C: Setting a research agenda for perioperative systems design. Semin Laparosc Surg 10(2):57-70.
5. Montgomery K, Bruyns C, Brown J, Sorkin S: Spring: A general framework for collaborative, real-time surgical simulation in: Westwood J et al (eds.): Medicine Meets Virtual Reality; Amsterdam; IOS Press, 2002.
6. Montgomery K, Heinrichs L, Bruyns C, Wildermuth S, et al: Surgical simulator for hysteroscopy: A case study of visualization in surgical training. Presented at IEEE Visualization 2001, San Diego Paradise Point Resort, San Diego, October 21-26, 2001.
7. McCormick BH, DeFanti: Special report: Visualization in scientific computing - a synopsis. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications (July 1987), pp 61-70.
8. http://www.strykercorp.com/. Last accessed August 6, 2003.
9. http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/. Last accessed August 6, 2003.
10. Rattner D, Park A: Advanced devices for the Operating Room of the Future. Semin Laparosc Surg 10(2):85-89.
11. Moore G: Nanometers and gigabucks--Moore on Moore's Law. Distinguished Lecture, 1996.
12. Lundstrom M: Is nanoelectronics the future of microelectronics? In: Source International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design. Monterey, Calif, 2002, pp 172-177.
13. Fuchs H, Livingston MA, Raskar R, Colucci D, et al: Augmented reality visualization for laparoscopic surgery. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp 934-943.
14. http://www.inneroptic.com. Last accessed August 6, 2003.
15. http://smartcamera.stanford.edu. Last accessed August 6, 2003.
16. Yang R, Brown MS, Seales WB, Fuchs H: Geometrically correct imagery for teleconferencing. In: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia, October 30-November 5, 1999.
17. Crockett TW, Orloff T: A MIMD rendering algorithm for distributed memory architectures. 1993 Parallel Rendering Symposium Proc; IEEE, October 1993, pp 35-42.
18. Humphreys G, Hanrahan P: A distributed graphics system for large tiled displays. Proceedings of Visualization '99, IEEE, October 1999, pp 215-223.
19. Muraki S, Ogata M, Ma K-L, Koshizuka K, et al: Next-generation visual supercomputing using PC clusters with volume graphics hardware devices. ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, November 2001.
20. Rhomberg A, EnzIer R, Thaler M, Tröster G: Design of a FEM computation engine for real-time laparoscopic surgery simulation. Proceedings of the First Merged International Parallel Processing Symposium and Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, Los Alamitos, California, 1998, pp 711-715
21. Guthart G Salisbury J Jr: The intuitive telesurgery system: Overview and application. Proc. IEEE ICRA, 2000.
22. Jaynes C, Seales B, Calvert K, Fei Z, et al: The Metaverse - a collection of inexpensive, self-configuring, immersive environments. 7th International Workshop on Immersive Projection Technology/Eurographics Workshop on Virtual Environments, Zurich Switzerland, May 2003.
23. Chandrakasan A, Min R, Bhardwaj M, Cho S-H, et al: Power aware wireless microsensor systems. Keynote paper, ESS-CIRC, Florence, Italy, September 2002.
24. Clema JK: General purpose tools for system simulation. 11th Annual Simulation Symposium Tampa, Florida, 1978, pp 37-60.
25. Chen H, Wallace G, Gupta A, Li K, et al: Experiences with scalability of display walls. In: Immersive Projection Technology Symposium (IPT), March 2002.
26. http://www.orofthefuture.org/overview/. Last accessed August 6, 2003.
27. Grimson E, Leventon M, Ettinger G, Chabrerie A, et al: Clinical experience with a high precision image-guided neurosurgery system. MICCAI, 1998, pp 63-73.
28. Cruz-Neira C, Sandin D, DeFanti T: Virtual reality: The design and implementation of the CAVE. Proceedings of SIG-GRAPH 93 Computer Graphics Conference, ACM SIG-GRAPH, August 1993, pp 135-142.
29. http://www.fakespacesystems.com/. Last accessed August 6, 2003.
30. Raskar R, Brown M, Yang R, Chen W, et al: Multi-projector displays using camera-based registration. IEEE Visualization '99, 1999.
31. Brown M, Seales W, Webb S, Jaynes C: Building large format displays for digital libraries. Communications of the ACM 44(5): 2001.