Demographic, psychological, sociological, and economic variables and other factors that justify the need for prosthodontic services, and that help to assess the outcome of care

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue , 2003, Pages 19-20

  Owen, C Peter ^a   Locker, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DEMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL HEALTH; ECONOMICS; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NUTRITION; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOLOGY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DENTAL PROSTHESIS; DENTAL RESEARCH; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSTHODONTICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TOOTH LOSS;

EID: 0242690964     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Agerberg G, Carlsson GE. Chewing ability in relation to dental and general health. Analysis of data obtained from a questionnaire. Acta Odontol Scand 1980; 39: 147-153.
2. Allen F, McMillan A. The impact of tooth loss in a denture wearing population: An assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1999; 16: 176-180.
3. Anderson JD. The need for criteria on reporting treatment outcomes. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 49-55.
4. Awad M, Feine J. Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998; 26: 400-405.
5. Corson M, Boyd T, Kind P, Allen P, Steele J. Measuring oral health: Does your treatment really make a difference? Br Dent J 1999; 187: 481-484.
6. Elias A, Sheiham A. The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number and position of teeth: Review. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 648-661.
7. Ettinger RL. Changing dietary patterns with changing dentition: How do people cope? Spec Care Dent 1998; 18: 33-39.
8. Fiske J, Davis D, Frances C, Gelbier S. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. Br Dent J 1998; 184: 90-93.
9. Hayes C. The use of patient-based outcome measures in clinical decision-making. Community Dent Health 1998; 15: 19-21.
10. Joshipura JJ, Wilett WC, Douglas CW. The impact of edentulousness on food and nutrient intake. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 459-467.
11. Locker D, Slade G. Association between clinical and subjective indicators of oral health status. Gerodontology 1994; 11: 108-114.
12. Onozuka M, Watanabe K, Nagasaki S, et al. Impairment of spatial memory and changes in astroglial responsiveness following loss of molar teeth in aged SAMP8 mice. Behav Brain Res 2000; 108: 145-155.
13. Sheiham A, Spencer J. Health needs assessment. In: Pine C (ed). Community Oral Health. Oxford, UK: Wright, 1997.
14. Sheiham A, Steele JG, Marcenes W, Finch S, Walls AWG. The impact of oral health on stated ability to eat certain foods: Findings from the national diet and nutrition survey of older people in Great Britain. Gerodontology 1999; 16: 11-20.
15. Slade G, Spencer J. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994; 11: 3-11.
16. Thompson G. The impact of the demographics of aging and the edentulous condition on dental care services. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 56-59.
17. Walter M, Wolf B, Rieger C, Boening K. Prosthetic treatment need in a representative German sample. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 708-716.
18. Witter D. The shortened dental arch concept and its implications for oral health care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999; 27: 249-258.