STR genotyping and mtDNA sequencing of latent fingerprint on paper

Forensic Science International

Volumn 137, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 188-195

  Balogh, M Kinga ^a   Burger, Joachim ^a   Bender, Klaus ^a   Schneider, Peter M ^a   Alt, Kurt W ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Latent fingerprint; LCN; mtDNA sequencing; STR genotyping

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CRIME; DEVICE; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA EXTRACTION; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DNA SEQUENCE; FINGER DERMATOGLYPHICS; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; PAPER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TANDEM REPEAT; TOUCH;

EID: 0242678366     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Findlay I., Matthews P., Quirke P. Multiple genetic diagnoses from single cells using multiplex PCR: reliability and allele dropout. Prenat. Diagn. 18(13):1998;1413-1421.
2. Findlay I., Taylor A., Quirke P., Frazier R. DNA fingerprinting from single cells. Nature. 389(6651):1997;555-556.
3. Hellmann A., Rohleder U., Schmitter H., Wittig M. STR typing of human telogen hairs - a new approach. Int. J. Legal. Med. 114(4-5):2001;269-273.
4. Barbaro A., Falcone G., Barbaro A. DNA typing from hair shaft. Prog. Forensic Genet. 8:2000;523-525.
5. Hochmeister M.N., Budowle B., Jung J., Borer U.V., Comey C.T., Dirnhofer R. PCR-based typing of DNA extracted from cigarette butts. Int. J. Legal. Med. 104(4):1991;229-233.
6. Hochmeister M.N., Rudin O., Ambach E. PCR analysis from cigaret butts, postage stamps, envelope sealing flaps, and other saliva-stained material. Methods Mol. Biol. 98:1998;27-32.
7. Allen M., Saldeen T., Gyllensten U. PCR-based DNA typing of saliva on stamps and envelopes. Biotechniques. 17(3):1994;546-552.
8. Hochmeister M.N. A discussion of 'PCR DNA typing of stamps: evaluation of the DNA extraction'. Forensic Sci. Int. 83(1):1996;75-79.
9. Sinclair K., McKechnie V.M. DNA extraction from stamps and envelope flaps using QIAamp and QIAshredder. J. Forensic Sci. 45(1):2000;229-230.
10. Fridez F., Coquoz R. PCR DNA typing of stamps: evaluation of the DNA extraction. Forensic Sci. Int. 78(2):1996;103-110.
11. Wiegand P. DNA-Untersuchung von Hautepithelzellen asserviert am Rollkragenpullover und am Hals des Opfers. Rechtsmedizin. 8:1998;226-228.
12. Wiegand P., Kleiber M. DNA typing of epithelial cells after strangulation. Int. J. Legal. Med. 110(4):1997;181-183.
13. Van Renterghem P., Leonard D., De Greef C. Use of latent fingerprints as a source of DNA for genetic identification. Prog. Forensic Genet. 8:2000;501-503.
14. Schulz M.M., Reichert W. A strategy for STR-analysis of cryptic epithelial cells on several textiles in practical casework. Prog. Forensic Genet. 8:2000;514-516.
15. van Oorschot R.A., Jones M.K. DNA fingerprints from fingerprints. Nature. 387(6635):1997;767.
16. R.A. van Oorschot, R.K. Weston, M.K. Jones, Retrieval of DNA from touched objects, in: ANZFSS (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on the Forensic Sciences of Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society, Adelaide, 1998, http://www.forensic.gov.uk/forensic/conference/ papers/genetic_profiles.pdf .
17. Ladd C., Adamowicz M.S., Bourke M.T., Scherczinger C.A., Lee H.C. A systematic analysis of secondary DNA transfer. J. Forensic Sci. 44(6):1999;1270-1272.
18. Lowe A., Murray C., Whitaker J.et al. The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces. Forensic Sci. Int. 129:2002;25-34.
19. Clayton T.M., Whitaker J.P., Sparkes R., Gill P. Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling. Forensic Sci. Int. 91(1):1998;55-70.
20. Greenspoon S.A., Lytle P.J., Turek S.A., Rolands J.M., Scarpetta M.A., Carr C.D. Validation of the PowerPlex 1.1 loci for use in human identification. J. Forensic Sci. 45(3):2000;677-683.
21. Balogh M.K., Burger J., Bender K., Schneider P. Fingerprints from fingerprints. Prog. Forensic Genet. 9:2003;953-957.
22. Burger J., Schoon R., Zeike B., Hummel S., Herrmann B. Species determination using species-discriminating PCR-RFLP of ancient DNA from prehistoric skeletal remains. Ancient Biomolecules. 4(1):2002;19-23.
23. Pesaresi M., Buscemi L., Alessandrini F., Tagliabracci A. Quali-quantitative analysis of DNA recovered from fingerprints. Prog. Forensic Genet. 9:2003;947-951.
24. Sen S. Programmed cell death: concept. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 67:1992;287-319.
25. Teraki Y., Shiohara T. Apoptosis and the skin. Eur. J. Dermatol. 9:1999;413-426.
26. D.E. van Hoofstat, D.L. Deforce, I. De Pauw, K. Janssen, M. Mestdagh, DNA typing of fingerprints and skin debris: sensitivity of capillary electrophoresis in forensic applications using multiplex PCR, in: Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium of Human Identification, 1998, pp. 131-137.
27. Burger J., Hummel S., Hermann B., Henke W. DNA preservation: a microsatellite-DNA study on ancient skeletal remains. Electrophoresis. 20(8):1999;1722-1728.
28. Krings M., Stone A., Schmitz R.W., Krainitzki H., Stoneking M., Paabo S. Neandertal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans. Cell. 90(1):1997;19-30.
29. Gill P. Application of low copy number DNA profiling. Croat. Med. J. 42(3):2001;229-232.
30. Fregeau C.J., Tan-Siew W.F., Yap K.H., Carmody G.R., Chow S.T., Fourney R.M. Population genetic characteristics of the STR Loci D21S11 and FGA in eight diverse human populations. Hum. Biol. 70(5):1998;813-844.
31. van Hoofstat D.E., Deforce D.L., Hubert De Pauw I.P., Van den Eeckhout E.G. DNA typing of fingerprints using capillary electrophoresis: effect of dactyloscopic powders. Electrophoresis. 20(14):1999;2870-2876.
32. Zamir A., Oz C., Geller B. Threat mail and forensic science: DNA profiling from items of evidence after treatment with DFO. J. Forensic Sci. 45(2):2000;445-446.
33. Gill P., Sparkes R., Pinchin R.et al. Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas. Forensic Sci. Int. 91(1):1998;41-53.
34. Gill P., Whitaker J., Flaxman C.et al. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci. Int. 112:2000;17-40.