Quantitative comparison of cDNA-AFLP, microarrays, and genechip expression data in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genomics

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 606-618

  Reijans, Martin ^a   Lascaris, Romeo ^b,c   Groeneger, Antoinette Oude ^a   Wittenberg, Alexander ^a   Wesselink, Erik ^a   Van Oeveren, Jan ^a   De Wit, Elzo ^b,c   Boorsma, André ^b   Voetdijk, Betsy ^b   Van Der Spek, Hans ^b   Grivell, Leslie Alan ^b,d   Simons, Guus ^a  

^a KEYGENE N V   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^d EMBO   (Germany)

Author keywords

cDNA AFLP; Differential gene expression; GeneChip; Glucose repression; Microarrays; Quantitative genome wide expression analysis; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA;

ACCURACY; AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HYBRIDIZATION; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0242678280     PISSN: 08887543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0888-7543(03)00179-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Eikhom T.S., Abraham K.A., Dowben R.M. Ribosomal RNA metabolism in synchronized plasmacytoma cells. Exp. Cell. Res. 91:1975;301-309.
2. Schena M., Shalon D., Davis R.W., Brown P.O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science. 270:1995;467-470.
3. Hoheisel J.D., Vingron M. Transcriptional profiling Is it worth the money? Res. Microbiol. 151:2000;113-119.
4. Liang P., Pardee A.B. Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction. Science. 257:1992;967-971.
5. Green C.D., Simons J.F., Taillon B.E., Lewin D.A. Open systems Panoramic views of gene expression . J. Immunol. Methods. 250:2001;67-79.
6. Vos P., et al. AFLP A new technique for DNA fingerprinting . Nucleic Acids Res. 23:1995;4407-4414.
7. Qin L., et al. An efficient cDNA-AFLP-based strategy for the identification of putative pathogenicity factors from the potato cyst nematode Globodera rostochiensis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13:2000;830-836.
8. Noel L., Thieme F., Nennstiel D., Bonas U. cDNA-AFLP analysis unravels a genome-wide hrpG-regulon in the plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Mol. Microbiol. 41:2001;1271-1281.
9. Bachem C.W., et al. Visualization of differential gene expression using a novel method of RNA fingerprinting based on AFLP Analysis of gene expression during potato tuber development . Plant J. 9:1996;745-753.
10. Majima S., Kajino K., Fukuda T., Otsuka F., Hino O. A novel gene "Niban" upregulated in renal carcinogenesis Cloning by the cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism approach . Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 91:2000;869-874.
11. Rizos D., et al. Analysis of differential messenger RNA expression between bovine blastocysts produced in different culture systems Implications for blastocyst quality . Biol. Reprod. 66:2002;589-595.
12. Breyne P., Zabeau M. Genome-wide expression analysis of plant cell cycle modulated genes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4:2001;136-142.
13. Donson J., et al. Comprehensive gene expression analysis by transcript profiling. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:2002;75-97.
14. DeRisi J.L., Iyer V.R., Brown P. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science. 278:1997;680-686.
15. Watson S.J., Meng F., Thompson R.C., Akil H. The "chip" as a specific genetic tool. Biol. Psychiatry. 48:2000;1147-1156.
16. Claverie J.M. Computational methods for the identification of differential and coordinated gene expression. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8:1999;1821-1832.
17. McAlister L., Holland M.J. Differential expression of the three yeast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes. J. Biol. Chem. 260:1985;15019-15027.
18. Isnard A.D., Thomas D., Surdin-Kerjan Y. The study of methionine uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a new family of amino acid permeases. J. Mol. Biol. 262:1996;473-484.
19. Taniguchi M., Miura K., Iwao H., Yamanaka S. Quantitative assessment of cDNA microarrays - Comparison with Northern blot analysis. Genomics. 71:2001;34-39.
20. Ishii M., et al. Direct comparison of GeneChip and SAGE on the quantitative accuracy in transcript profiling analysis. Genomics. 68:2000;136-143.
21. Graves J.A., Henry S.A. Regulation of the yeast INO1 gene The products of the INO2, INO4 and OPI1 regulatory genes are not required for repression in response to inositol . Genetics. 154:2000;1485-1495.
22. Shirra M.K., Arndt K.M. Evidence for the involvement of the Glc7-Reg1 phosphatase and the Snf1-Snf4 kinase in the regulation of INO1 transcription in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 152:1999;73-87.
23. Evertsz E.M., Au-Young J., Ruvolo M.V., Lim A.C., Reynolds M.A. Hybridization cross-reactivity within homologous gene families on glass cDNA microarrays. BioTechniques. 31:2001;1182-1192.
24. Kane M.D., et al. Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of oligonucleotide (50-mer) microarray. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:2000;4552-4557.
25. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408 (2002) 796-815.
26. Lashkari D.A., et al. Yeast microarrays for genome wide parallel genetic and gene expression analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;13057-13062.
27. Alepuz P.M., Cunningham K.W., Estruch F. Glucose repression affects ion homeostasis in yeast through the regulation of the stress-activated ENA1 gene. Mol. Microbiol. 26:1997;91-98.