Polynomial iterative algorithms for coloring and analyzing random graphs

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 3 2, 2003, Pages 367021-3670215

  Braunstein, A ^a,b   Mulet, R ^a,c   Pagnani, A ^a,d   Weigt, M ^a,e   Zecchina R , ^a  

^a ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Italy)

^b SISSA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAVANA   (Cuba)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; POLYNOMIALS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

RANDOM GRAPHS;

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 0242663429     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability (Freeman, New York, 1979).
2. F.Y. Wu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235 (1982).
3. K. Appel and W. Haken, Ill. J. Math. 21, 421 (1977); 21, 491 (1977).
4. K. Appel and W. Haken, Ill. J. Math. 21, 421 (1977); 21, 491 (1977).
5. Complexity of Computer Computation, edited by R.E. Miller and J.W. Thatcher (Plenum Press, New York, 1972), p. 85.
6. S. Mertens, Comput. Sci. Eng, 4, 31 (2002).
7. For a comprehensive collection of benchmark and tests for SAT solvers, see http://www.satlib.org
8. G.J. Chaitin, M.A. Auslander, A.K. Chandra, J. Cocke, M.E. Hopkins, and P. Markstein, Comput. Speech Lang. 6, 47 (1981).
9. P. Erdös and A. Rènyi, Publ. Math. (Debrecen) 6, 290 (1959).
10. Artif. Intell. 81, 1-2 (1996).
11. Theor. Comput. Sci. 265, 1-2 (2001).
12. K. Binder andA.P. Young, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801 (1986); M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and M.A. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore 1987); K.H. Fisher and J.A. Hertz, Spin Glasses (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991).
13. K. Binder andA.P. Young, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801 (1986); M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and M.A. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore 1987); K.H. Fisher and J.A. Hertz, Spin Glasses (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991).
14. K. Binder andA.P. Young, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801 (1986); M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and M.A. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore 1987); K.H. Fisher and J.A. Hertz, Spin Glasses (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991).
15. M. Mézard and G. Parisi, Eur. Phys. J. B 20, 217 (2001).
16. R. Mulet, A. Pagnani, M. Weigt, and R. Zecchina, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 268701 (2002).
17. T. Luczak, Combinatorica 11, 45 (1991).
18. I. Kanter and H. Sompolinsky, J. Phys. A 20, L673 (1987).
19. B. Pittel, J. Spencer, and N. Wormald, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 67, 111 (1996).
20. M. Molloy, Random Struct. Algorithms 7, 159 (1996).
21. D. Achlioptas and C. Moore, Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) 2002 (unpublished).
22. J. Culberson and Ian P. Gent, Theor. Comput. Sci. 265, 227 (1991).
23. A.C. Kaporis, L.M. Kirousis, and Y.C. Stamatiou, Electr. J. Comb. 7, R29 (2000).
24. J. van Mourik and D. Saad, Phys. Rev. E 66, 056120 (2002).
25. M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and R. Zecchina, Science 297, 812 (2002).
26. M. Mézard and G. Parisi, J. Stat. Phys. 111, 1 (2003).
27. M. Mézard and R. Zecchina, Phys. Rev. E 66, 056126 (2002).
28. F. Guerra and F.L. Toninelli, e-print cond-mat/0208579.
29. S. Franz and M. Leone, e-print cond-mat/0208280.
30. M. Talagrand, Spin Glasses: A Challenge for Mathematicians. Mean-field Models and Cavity Method (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, in press).
31. E. Marinari, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, and F. Zuliani, J. Stat. Phys. 98, 973 (2000).
32. The educated reader will recognize that this construction is actually a rephrasement of the real replica argument due to Monasson [40] in which we consider the limiting case β →, m→0 such that y = mβ is finite.
33. F. Ricci-Tersenghi, M. Weigt, and R. Zecchina, Phys. Rev. E 63, 026702 (2001).
34. S. Cocco, O. Dubois, J. Mandler, and R. Monasson, e-print cond-mat/0206239.
35. M. Mézard, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and R. Zecchina, e-print cond-mat/0207140.
36. c) displayed in the table of Sec. I for q = 3 are therefore to be considered as a lower bound to the true value.
37. R. Monasson and R. Zecchina, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2432 (1995).
38. M. Weigt and A.K. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6118 (2000).
39. A. Montanari and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, e-print cond-mat/0301591.
40. A. Braunstein, M. Mézard, M. Weigt, and R. Zecchina (unpublished).
41. Graph Coloring Page, http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/̃joe
42. R. Monasson and R. Zecchina, Phys. Rev. E 56, 1357 (1997).
43. R. Monasson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2847 (1995).
44. F.R. Kschischang, B.J. Frey, and H.-A. Loeliger, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 47, 498 (2002).
45. J.S. Yedidia, W.F. Freeman, and Y. Weiss, Mitsubishi Electrical Research Laboratories, Report TR-2002-35 (unpublished), available online at http://www.merl.com
46. S. Mertens, M. Mezard, and R. Zecchina (unpublished).
47. A. Montanari and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 017203 (2003)