The influence of surface and edge-based visual similarity on object recognition

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 232-234

  Laws, Keith R ^c   Gale, Tim M ^a,b   Leeson, Verity C ^c  

^a QUEEN ELIZABETH II HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0242662502     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00154-4     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Biederman I. Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review. 94:1987;115-145.
2. Farah M.J. Visual agnosia. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch J., Quinlan P.T. Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 5:1988;67-103.
4. Laws K.R., Gale T.M. Category-specific naming and the 'visual' characteristics of line-drawn stimuli. Cortex. 38:2002;7-21.
5. Laws K.R., Leeson V.C., Gale T.M. The effect of 'masking' on picture naming latencies. Cortex. 38:2002;137-147.
6. Laws K.R., Gale T.M., Frank R.J., Davey N. Visual similarity is greater for line drawings of nonliving than living things: The importance of musical instruments and body-parts. Brain and Cognition. 48:2002;421-423.
7. Marr D. Vision. 1982;WH Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
8. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 6:1980;174-215.
9. Tranel D., Logan C.G., Frank R.J., Damasio A.R. Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities. Neuropsychologia. 35:1997;1329-1339.