Deciding the Future of GM Crops in Europe

Science

Volumn 302, Issue 5647, 2003, Pages 994-996

  Freckleton, R P ^a   Sutherland, W J ^b   Watkinson, A R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HERBICIDE;

CROP; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM;

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY; CROP IMPROVEMENT; CROP MANAGEMENT; CROP PRODUCTION; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECOSYSTEM; EUROPE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROP; GOVERNMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; WEED CONTROL; AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEET; BEETLE; CROP; ENVIRONMENT; FORECASTING; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MAIZE; METHODOLOGY; POLICY; PUBLIC OPINION; RAPESEED; TRANSGENIC PLANT; UNITED KINGDOM;

BOVINAE;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMALS; BEETLES; BETA VULGARIS; BIODIVERSITY; BRASSICA NAPUS; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; FORECASTING; GREAT BRITAIN; HERBICIDES; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0242662482     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1092671     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. G. R. Squire et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358, 1779 (2003); published online 16 October 2003 (10.1098/rstb.2003.1403).
2. G. T. Champion et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358, 1801 (2003); published online 16 October 2003 (10.1098/rstb.2003.1405).
3. M. S. Heard et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358, 1819 (2003); published online 16 October 2003 (10.1098/rstb.2003.1402).
4. M. S. Heard et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358, 1833 (2003); published online 16 October 2003 (10.1098/rstb.2003.1401).
5. S. D. R. Brooks et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358, 1847 (2003); published online 16 October 2003 (10.1098/rstb.2003.1407).
6. A. J. Haughton et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358, 1863 (2003); published online 16 October 2003 (10.1098/rstb.2003.1408).
7. D. B. Roy et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358, 1879 (2003); published online 16 October 2003 (10.1098/rstb.2003.1404).
8. C. Hawes et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358, 1899 (2003); published online 16 October 2003 (10.1098/rstb.2003.1406).
9. Strategy Unit. Field Work: Weighing up the Costs and Benefits of GM crops. Cabinet Office, London. www.number-10.gov.uk/su/gm/index.htm (2003).
10. The GM Science Review Panel. GM Science Review (First Report): An open review of the science relevant to GM crops and food based on interests and concerns of the public. Department of Trade and Industry, London. www.gmsciencedebate.org.uk/report (2003).
11. A. R. Watkinson et al., Science 289, 1554 (2000).
12. GM Nation? The findings of the public debate. Department of Trade and Industry. London. www. gmpublicdebate.org (2003).
13. S. Campbell, E. Townsend, Nature 425, 559 (2003).
14. L. G. Firbank et al. J. Appl. Ecol. 40, 2 (2003).
15. R. P. Freckleton et al., Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B, in press.
16. A. M. Dewar et al., Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B 270, 335 (2003).
17. J. R. Krebs et al., Nature 400, 611 (1999).
18. R. A. Robinson, W. J. Sutherland, J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 157 (2002).