pQCT provides better prediction of canine femur breaking load than does DXA

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 240-245

  Moisio, Kirsten C ^a   Podolskaya, G ^b   Barnhart, B ^a   Berzins, A ^a   Sumner, D R ^a  

^a RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Orthopaedic Affairs   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone density; Bone mechanics; Dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA); Femur; pQCT

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE BOWING; BONE DENSITY; BONE MASS; BONE MINERAL; BONE STRENGTH; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; DOG; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; GEOMETRY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; VARIANCE; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 0242659257     PISSN: 11087161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, Genant HK, Palermo L, Scott J, Vogt TM. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 1993; 341:72-75.
2. De Laet CE, Van Hout BA, Burger H, Weel AE, Hofman A, Pols HA. Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam study. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13:1587-1593.
3. Doboeuf F, Hans D, Schott AM, Kotzki PO, Favier F, Marcelli C, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD. Different morphometric and densitometric parameters predict cervical and trochanteric hip fracture: The EPIDOS study. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12:1895-1902.
4. Lunt M, Felsenberg D, Reeve J, Benevolenskaya L, Cannata J, Dequeker J, Dodenhof C, Falch JA, Masaryk P, Pols HA, Poor G, Reid DM, Scheidt-Nave C, Weber K, Varlow J, Kanis JA, O'Neill TW, Silman AJ. Bone density variation and its effects on risk of vertebral deformity in men and women studied in thirteen European centers: the EVOS study. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12:1883-1894.
5. Melton LJ III, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL. Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8:1227-1233.
6. Milgrom C, Giladi M, Simkin A, Rand N, Kedem R, Kashtan H, Stein M, Gomori M. The area moment of inertia of the tibia: a risk factor for stress fractures. J Biomech 1989; 22:1243-1248.
7. Turner CH, Burr DB. Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone 1993; 14:595-608.
8. Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Zanchetta JR. Mechanical validation of a tomographic (pQCT) index for noninvasive estimation of rat femur bending strength. Bone 1996; 18:97-102.
9. Brodt MD, Ellis CB, Silva MJ. Growing C57B1/6 mice increase whole bone mechanical properties by increasing geometric and material properties. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14:2159-2166.
10. Cheng XG, Lowet G, Boonen S, Nicholson PHF, Brys P, Nijs J, Dequeker J. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry. Bone 1997; 20:213-218.
11. Esses SI, Lotz JC, Hayes WC. Biomechanical properties of the proximal femur determined in vitro by single-energy quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 1989; 4:715-722.
12. Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Mondelo N, Montuori E, Zanchetta JR. Determination of femur structural properties by geometric and material variables as a function of body weight in rats. Evidence of a sexual dimorphism. Bone 1993; 14:265-270.
13. Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Mondelo N, Zanchetta JR. Interrelationships between densitometric, geometric, and mechanical properties of rat femora: inferences concerning mechanical regulation of bone remodeling. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8:1389-1396.
14. Jamsa T, Tuukkanen J, Jalovaara P. Femoral neck strength of mouse in two loading configurations: method evaluation and fracture characteristics. J Biomech 1998; 31:723-729.
15. Jurist JM, Foltz AS. Human ulnar bending stiffness, mineral content, geometry, and strength. J Biomech 1977; 10:455-459.
16. Martens M, Van Audekercke R, De Meester P, Mulier JC. Mechanical behaviour of femoral bones in bending loading. J Biomech 1986; 19:443-454.
17. Wilhelm G, Felsenberg D, Bogusch G, Willnecker J, Thaten J, Gummert P. Biomechanical examinations for validation of the bone strength strain index SSI, calculated by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. In: Lyritis GP (ed) Musculoskeletal Interactions, Vol. 2. Hylonome Editions, Athens, Greece; 1999:105-110.
18. Hayes WC, Piazza SJ, Zysset PK. Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am 1991; 29:1-18.
19. Seeman E. An exercise in geometry. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17:373-380.
20. Martin RB, Butcher RL, Sherwood LL, Buckendahl P, Boyd RD, Farris D, Sharkey N, Dannucci G. Effects of ovariectomy in beagle dogs. Bone 1987; 8:23-31.
21. Jamsa T, Jalovaara P, Peng Z, Vaananen HK, Tuukkanen J. Comparison of three-point bending test and peripheral quantitative computed tomography analysis in the evaluation of the strength of mouse femur and tibia. Bone 1998; 23:155-161.
22. Cody DD, Gross GJ, Hou FJ, Spencer J, Goldstein SA, Fyhrie DP. Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J Biomech 1999; 32:1013-1020.
23. Strømsøe K, Høiseth A, Alho A, Kok WL. Bending strength of the femur in relation to non-invasive bone mineral assessment. J Biomech 1995; 28:857-861.