Innovations in Teaching Plant Pathology

Annual Review of Phytopathology

Volumn 41, Issue , 2003, Pages 377-398

  Schumann, G L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Distance learning; Group learning; Inquiry based learning; Instructional technology; Scholarship of teaching and learning

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; AWARENESS; EDUCATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PLANT DISEASE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; REVIEW; UNIVERSITY;

AWARENESS; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; EDUCATION, GRADUATE; FACULTY; FELLOWSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PLANT DISEASES;

EID: 0242658640     PISSN: 00664286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095546     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. APSnet Education Center. http://www. apsnet.org/education
2. Arneson PA. 2002. An alternative to exams for student evaluation. Plant Health Instr. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-T-2002-0302-01
3. Baker CA. 2002. Teaching plant pathology online to non-majors. Phytopathology 92:S111
4. Benson AP, Bruce BC. 2001. Using the web to promote inquiry and collaboration: a snapshot of the Inquiry Page's development. Teach. Educ. 12:153-63
5. Bloom BS, Englehart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR. 1956. Taxonomy of Education Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay
6. Bonwell CC, Eison JA. 1991. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Educ. Rep. No. 1. Washington, DC: George Washington Univ., Sch. Educ. Hum. Dev.
7. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, eds. 1999. How People Learn; Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
8. Bridge P, Jeffries P, Morse DR, Scott PR. 1997. Information Technology, Plant Pathology, and Biodiversity. Wallingford, UK: CAB Int.
9. nd ed.
10. Brown R. 2001. Thinking in multimedia: research-based tips on designing and using interactive multimedia curricula. J. Ext. 39(3): http://www.joe.org/ joe/2001june/ tt1.html
11. Bruffee KA. 1993. Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
12. Burbules NC, Callister TA. 2000. Universities in transition: the promise and the challenge of new technologies. Teach. Coll. Rec. 102:271-73
13. Carroll JE. 1994. Learning Biology with Plant Pathology. Reston, VA: Natl. Assoc. Biol. Teach.
14. Culbreath AK, Todd JW, Brown SL, Pappu HR. 2001. A web-based tool for risk assessment of Tomato spotted wilt virus infections in peanut. ISPP Instr. Technol. Symp. http://www.ispp-itsymposium.org. nz/papers/submiss-20/index.html
15. Curtis CR. 2002. Is asynchronous teaching and learning worth it for you? Top ten take-home lessons on starting an online course. Plant Health Instr. DOI:10.1094/PHI-T-2002-0820-01
16. rd ed
17. D'Arcy CJ, Eastburn DM, Bruce BC. 2002. PPP: plants, pathogens, and people. A web site to improve student awareness of agriculture. Plant Health Instr. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-T-2002-0514-01
18. D'Arcy CJ, Eastburn DM, Schumann GL. 2001. Illustrated glossary of plant pathology. Plant Health Instr. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-1-2001-0219-01
19. Davidson N, Worsham T. 1992. Enhancing Thinking through Cooperative Learning. New York: Teachers Coll. Press
20. Eastburn DM, D'Arcy CJ. 1996. Late Blight and the Irish Potato Famine (video). St. Paul: Am. Phytopathol. Soc. Press
21. Eastburn DM, D'Arcy CJ, McKee LA. 2000. Dutch Elm Disease and the American Elm: The Risks and Benefits of Monoculture (video). St. Paul: Am. Phytopathol. Soc. Press
22. Francl LF, Neher DA. 1997. Exercises in Plant Disease Epidemiology. St. Paul: Am. Phytopathol. Soc. Press
23. Grey WE, Mathre DE. 2001. Plant diseases in the news. Plant Health Instr. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-T-2001-1025-02
24. Handelsman J, Houser B, Kriegel H. 1996. Biology Brought to Life: A Guide to Teaching Students to Think Like Scientists. New York: McGraw-Hill
25. Holmes GJ, Shoemaker PB, Cubeta MA. 2002. Teaching graduate level, laboratory-based plant pathology via interactive television. Phytopathology 92:S112
26. Hudler GW. 1998. Magical Mushrooms, Mischievous Molds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
27. Int. Certif. Crop Advisors Board Self-Study Units Cont. Educ. 2001. http://www. agronomy.org/cca/other_self_study.html
28. Int. Soc. Plant Pathol. (ISPP) Teach. Comm. Online Instr. Technol. Symp. June. Archive: http://www.ispp-itsymposium. org.nz/
29. Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA. 1991. Cooperative learning:increasing college faculty instructional productivity. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Educ. Rep. No. 4
30. Kraska T. The Plant Pathology Internet Guide Book. http://www.pk.uni- bonn. de/ppigb/ppigb.htm
31. Kriegel H, Handelsman J, Houser B. 1996. Biology Brought to Life:Laboratory Guidebook. New York: McGraw-Hill
32. Leach JE. 2002. Collaborative graduate teaching via Internet 2. Phytopathology 92: S112
33. Little EL. 2001. Distance education plant pathology courses at the University of Georgia. ISPP Instr. Technol. Symp. http:// www.ispp-itsymposium. org.nz/papers/sub miss_18/index.html
34. Lopez J, Whittington MS. 2001. Higher-order thinking in a college course: a case study. NACTA J. 45(4):22-28
35. Mathre DE, Grey WE. 2002. Naughty peat: a case study in plant pathology, with emphasis on Koch's postulates and disease etiology. Plant Health Instr. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-T-2002-0301-01
36. Meachen EW. 2002. The arrival of standards for web-based instruction and the re-thinking of distributed learning. Phytopathology 92:S112
37. Natl. Comm. Sci. Educ. Stand. Assess. 1995. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
38. Natl. Res. Counc. Comm. Biol. Inservice Teach. Prog. 1996. The Role of Scientists in the Professional Development of Science Teachers. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
39. Partridge JE, Osborne L. 1999. Designing and using world wide web study pages to support student learning outside of the classroom. NACTA J. 43:43-46
40. Re-Envisioning the Ph.D. Website sponsored by Univ. Washington and The Pew Charitable Trusts, http://www.grad.wash ington.edu/envision/
41. Ross JL, Schulz RA. 1999. Using the world wide web to accommodate diverse learning styles. Col. Teach. 47:123-29
42. Russell TL. 1999. The No Significant Difference Phenomenon. Montgomery, AL: IDECC. http://teleeducation.nb.ca/signifi cantdifference/; http://teleeducation.nb.ca/ nosignificantdifference/
43. Schmidt SJ, Buriak P, D'Arcy CJ, Litchfield JB, Javenkoski JS, et al. 2002. The Teaching College course: a faculty, staff, and graduate student development program to enhance teaching quality. NACTA J. 46(2):18-27
44. Schumann GL. 1991.Plant Diseases: Their Biology and Social Impact. St. Paul: Am. Phytopathol. Soc. Press
45. Schumann GL. 1998. Electronic teaching aids for students and practitioners. See Ref. 7a, pp. 347-57
46. Schumann GL. 2002. Enhanced learning through role-playing. Plant Health Instr. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-T-2002-0225-02
47. Schumann GL, D'Arcy CJ. 1999. Plant pathology courses for agricultural awareness. Plant Dis. 83:492-501
48. Schumann GL, MacDonald JD. 1997. Turfgrass Diseases: Diagnosis and Management CD-ROM. St. Paul: Am. Phytopathol. Soc. Press
49. Schumann GL, Tainter FH, Evans TA. 1998. A multilingual, illustrated introduction to plant pathogens and diseases. http:// www.apsnet.org/education/ Mlingual/top. html
50. Stewart TM. 1992. Diagnosis. A microcomputer-based teaching-aid. Plant Dis. 76:644-47
51. Stewart TM. 1997. Computer games and other tricks to train plant pathologists. See Ref. 7a, pp. 381-94
52. Stewart TM 2001. Electronic extra-muralisation of plant protection - a case study. ISPP Online Instr. Technol. Symp. http://www.ispp-itsymposium.org. nz/papers/submiss_25/index.html
53. Stewart TM, Blackshaw BP, Duncan S, Dale ML, Zalucki MP, et al. 1995. Diagnosis: a novel, multimedia, computer-based approach to training crop protection practitioners. Crop Prot. 14:241-46
54. Tainter FH, Schumann GL, Evans TA. 1995. Development of the plant pathology laser videodisc. J. Nat. Resour. Life Sci. Educ. 24:48-52
55. Univ. Illinois Teach. Internet Distance Semin. Arch., Dec. 1999. http://www.vpaa. uillinois.edu/reports_retreats/tid.asp
56. Vereet J-A, Klink H. 2002. The Biology of Fungal Pathogens. Vol. 1: Fungal Pathogens and Diseases of Cereals (3 videos). St. Paul: Am. Phytopathol. Soc. Press
57. Vincelli P. 2001. Cytology of fungal infection. Plant Health Instr. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-1-2001-0618-01
58. Vincelli P. 2002. QoI (strobilurin) fungicides: benefits and risks. Plant Health Instr. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-I-2002-0809-02
59. Vincelli P, Heist P. 2002. Student reaction to review sessions modeled after the DeBary Bowl. Plant Health Instr. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-T-2002-0303-01
60. Whittington MS. 1995. Higher order thinking opportunities provided by professors in college of agriculture classrooms. J. Agric. Educ. 36:32-38