Towards an explanatory, predictive account of awareness

Computers and Graphics (Pergamon)

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 859-872

  Hourizi, Rachid ^a   Johnson, Peter ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Awareness; Design; Predictive model; Situation awareness

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; MAINTENANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

HUMAN COMPUTER AWARENESS (HCA);

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0242658598     PISSN: 00978493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2003.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gaba D.M., Howard S.K., Small S.D. Situation awareness in anaesthesiology. Human Factors. 37:1995;20-31.
2. Hogg DN, Torralba B, Volden FS. A situation awareness methodology for the evaluation of process control systems: studies of feasibility and implication of use. Storfjell Norway Oecd Halden Reactor Project, 1993.
3. Hutchins E. Cognition in the wild. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Pedersen E. People presence or room activity: supporting peripheral awareness over distance. In: ACM CHI Companion Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, CA, 1998. p. 283-4.
5. Holmquist LE, Skog T. Informative art: information visualization in everyday environments. In: Proceedings of Graphite, Melbourne, Australia, 2003, 2003.
6. Mankoff J, Dey AK, Hsieh Kientz G, Lederer J, Ames SM. Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: ACM Press. p. 169-76.
7. TSB of Canada. Crossing accident canadian national train No. 313-1M-14 Mile 47.48, Mont-Joli Subdivision, Causapscal, Quebec. Report Number R94m0100, 1994.
8. Tan DS, Czerwinski M, Robertson GG. Women go with the (optical) flow. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: ACM Press, 2003. p. 209-15.
9. Grudin J. Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA, 2001. p. 458-65.
10. McCarthy JF. Event manager: support for the peripheral awareness of events. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing (Huc 2000), Berlin: Springer, 2000.
11. Horvitz E, Jacobs A, Hovel D. Attention-sensitive alerting. Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence (UAI 1999), Stockholm, 1999.
12. Bureau Enquetes Accidents. Rapport De La Commission D'Enquête Sur L'accident Survenu Le 20 Janvier 1992 Près Du Mont Sainte-Odile (Bas Rhin) À L'airbus A 320 Immatriculé F-GGED, 1992.
13. ATSB. Investigation Report 1999045538. Boeing 747-438, VH-OJH, Bangkok, Thailand, 23 September 1999, 2001.
14. Aeronautica Civil of the Republic of Colombia. AA965 Cali Accident Report, Near Buga, Colombia, December 20 1995, 1996.
15. Wiener E. Human factors of advanced technology ("Glass cockpit") transport aircraft. Nasa Contractor Report 1 77528, Nasa Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 1989.
16. Federal Aviation Administration. Federal Aviation Administration Human Factors Team Report on the Interfaces Between Flight Crews and Modern Flightdeck Systems. Washington, DC, 1996.
17. Hourizi R, Johnson P. Beyond mode error: supporting strategic knowledge structures to enhance cockpit safety. In: Blandford A, Vanderdonkt J, Gray P, editor. People and computers XV - interaction without frontiers, Joint Proceedings of HCI 2001 and ICM 2001. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
18. Cadiz J, Gupta A, Jancke G, Venolia G. Sideshow: providing peripheral awareness of important information. Microsoft Research Tech Report Msr-Tr-200183, 2001.
19. Johnson P, Johnson H, Hamilton F. Getting the knowledge into HCI-theoretical+practical aspects of task knowledge structures. In: Schraagen JM, Chirman SF, Shaun VL, editors. Cognitive Task Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 201-14.
20. Olsen GM, Olson JS. Research on computer supported collaborative work. In: Helander M, Landauer T, Prasad P, editors. Handbook of human computer interaction, 2nd Completely Revised ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1997.
21. Endsley MR. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: HFES, 1988. p. 97-101.
22. Sarter NB, Woods DD. How in the World did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness. In: Supervisory Control. Human Factors 1995;37:5-19.
23. Endsley MR. Situational awareness in aviation systems. In: Garland DJ, Wise JA, Hopkin VD, editors. Handbook of aviation human factors. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999.
24. Rushby J. Using model checking to help discover mode confusions and other surprises. In: Javaux D, editor. Proceedings of the Third Workshop On Human Error, Safety and System Development. Liege, Belgium: HESSD. 1999.
25. Hourizi R, Johnson P. Unmasking mode error: a new application of task knowledge principles to the knowledge gaps in cockpit design. In: Michitaka Hirose, editor. Proceedings of Interact 2001, Eighth IFIP TC. 13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Tokyo, Japan: IOS Press; 2001. p. 229-46.
26. Barnard P.J., May J. Towards a theory based form of cognitive task analysis of broad scope and applicability. Schraagen M.C., Chipman S.F., Shalin V.L. Cognitive task analysis. 2000;147-163 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, London.
27. Johnson T, Johnson O. The illusion of life: Disney animation. New York: Little, Brown and Company; 1981.
28. Johnson A, Pritchett AR. Experimental study of vertical flight path mode awareness. Presented at the Sixth IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems, Cambridge, MA, 1995.