The influence of a reading and writing curriculum on transfer learning across subjects and grades1

Reading Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 177-215

  Aulls, Mark W ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242641180     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02702710308233     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Afflerbach, P., & Walker, B. (1992). Main idea instruction: An analysis of three basal reader series. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 11–28
2. Anderson, J. A., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–11.
3. Applebee, A. (1981). Writing in the secondary school. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
4. Applebee, A. (1984). Contexts for learning to write. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Aulls, M. W. (1988). Active composing and thinking Level I. Teachers guide. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
6. Aulls, M. W. (1998). Contributions of classroom discourse to what content students learn during curriculum enactment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 1–14.
7. Aulls, M. W., Browns, F., Cohen, M., Klein, C., Michaud, D., & Paré, A. (1987). A methodology for analyzing and coding cognitive variables which underlie expository text, academic tasks and students’ representations of their knowledge of topics of study. Technical Report No. 1. Montreal, QC: McGill University, Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling.
8. Aulls, M. W., & Halliday, F. (1991, November). How children of different abilities respond to summary instruction within an- integrated curriculum. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
9. Aulls, M. W., & Holt, W. (1987). Active composing and thinking. Level I. Student book. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
10. Baily, R. W., Bringle, R. T., & Smith, E. L. (1980). Measuring student writing ability. In A. Freedman & I. Pringle (Eds.), Reinventing the rhetorical tradition (pp. 137–144). Conway, AR: University of Central Arkansas Press.
11. Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher–curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts (pp. 1–22). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
12. Ben-Peretz, M., & Siberstein, M. (1982). A curriculum development case study in biology: Two levels of interpretation. European Journal of Science Education, 4, 377–389.
13. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1988). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 778–804). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.
15. Cariedo, N., & Alotiso-Tapia, J. (1996). Main idea comprehension: Training teachers and effects on students. Journal of Research in Reading, 19, 315–322.
16. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (pp. 101–118). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Collins, E., & Green, J. L. (1992). Learning in classroom settings: Making or breaking a culture. In H. H. Marshall (Ed.), Redefining students’ learning: Roots of educational change (pp. 54–85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Cordon, L. A., & Day, J. D. (1996). Strategy use on standardized reading comprehension tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 288–295.
20. Cornbleth, C. (1988). Curriculum in and out of context. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3, 85–96.
21. Cornet, J. W. (1990). Teacher thinking about curriculum and instruction: A case study of a secondary social studies teacher. Theory and Research in Social Education, 18, 248–273.
22. Derry, S. J., & Murphy, D. A. (1986). Designing systems that train learning ability: From theory to practice. Review of Educational Research, 56, 1–39.
23. Dillinger, M. (1985). Segmentation and clause analysis. Lab Report No. 3. Montreal, QC: McGill University, Discourse Processing Laboratory.
24. Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486-16). New York: McMillan.
25. Durst, R. K., & Newell, G. E. (1989). The uses of function: James Britton’s category system and research on writing. Review of Educational Research, 59, 375–394.
26. Elbaz, F. (1981). The teacher’s “practical knowledge”: Report of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11, 43–69.
27. Elbaz, F. (1933). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York: Nicols.
28. Elbaz, F. (1989). Research on teachers’ knowledge: The evolution of a discourse. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23, 1–19.
29. Englert, C. C., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., & Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337–372.
30. Gage, N. L., & Needles, M. C. (1989). Process-product research on teaching: A review of criticisms. The Elementary School Journal, 89(3), 257–267.
31. Gamoran, A., & Nystrand, M. (1991). Taking students seriously. Unpublished manuscript, National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, and the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, School of Education.
32. Goldman, S. R. (1995). Paragraphing, reader, and task effects on discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20(3), 273–305.
33. Greeno, J., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: MacMillan.
34. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar London: Arnold.
35. Hammill, D. D., & Larsen, S. C. (1978). Test of written language. Austin, TX: Services for Professional Educators.
36. Hasan, R. (1980). The texture of a text Unpublished manuscript Sophia University, Tokyo.
37. Heap, J. (1980). What counts as readings: Units to certainty in assessment. Curriculum Inquiry, 10, 265–292.
38. Heibert, B., & Raphael, T. (1996). Psychological perspectives on literacy and extensions to educational practice. In D. Berliner, & R. R. Calfeee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 550–602). New York: MacMillan.
39. Langer, J., & Allington, R. (1992). Curriculum research in writing and reading. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 687–725). New York: Macmillan.
40. Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. (1987). How writing shapes thinking. National Council for Teachers of English.
41. Lysynchuk, L. M., Pressley, M., D’Ailly, H., Smith, M., & Cake, H. (1989). A methodological analysis of experimental studies of comprehension strategy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 458–470.
42. MacDonald, J. B. (1986). The domain of the curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 1, 205–213.
43. Marland, P., & Osborne, B. (1990). Classroom theory, thinking and action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 93–109.
44. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehensionmonitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117–175.
45. Paris, S., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.
46. Paris, S., Wasok, B. A., & Van der Westhuizen, G. (1988). Metacognition: A review of research on metacognition and reading. In J. Readence, & R. S. Baldwin (Eds.), Dialogues in literacy research, 37th yearbook (pp. 143–166). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
47. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
48. Pressley, M., Beard, R., & Brown, R. (1990, May). Is good reading comprehension possible? Paper presented at the University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
49. Pressley, M., Gaskins, I., Wile, D., Cunicelli, B., & Sheridan, J. (1991). Teaching literacy strategies across the curriculum: A case study of Benchmark School. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 40, 219–228.
50. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I. W., & Schuder, T. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 513–555.
51. Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., & Marks, M. B. (1992). But good strategy instructors are constructivists. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 3–31.
52. Pressley, M., Schuder, T., SAIL Teachers, Bergman, J. L., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1992). A researcher-educator collaborative interview study of transactional comprehension strategies instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 231–246.
53. Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 559-586.
54. Roller, C. M. (1990). Commentary The interaction of knowledge and structure variables in the processing of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 79–89.
55. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Written composition. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 1–31). New York: McMillan.
56. Scardamalia, M., & Paris, P. (1985). The function of explicit discourse knowledge in the development of text representations and composing strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 1–39.
57. Scevak, J. J. (1993). Training students to use maps to increase text recall. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 401–413.
58. Schellings, G. L. M., Van-Hout-Wolters, & Bernadette, H. A. M. (1995). Main points in an instructional text, as identified by students and by their teachers. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 742–756.
59. Snow, R. (1978). Representative and quasi-representative designs for research on teaching. Review of Educational Research, 44, 265–291.
60. Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402–435). New York: MacMillan.
61. Spiegel, D. L., & Fitzgerald, J. (1990). Textual cohesion and coherence in children’s writing revisited. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 48–66.
62. Spring, C., & Prager, J. (1992). Teaching community-college students to follow the train of thought in expository texts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 33–54.
63. Stevens, R. J. (1991). The effects of cooperative learning and direct instruction in reading comprehension strategies on main ideas identification. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 8–16.
64. Stodolsky, S. (1989). Is teaching really by the book? In P. W. Jackson, & S. Haroutunian-Gordon (Eds.), From Socrates to software: The teacher as text and the text as teacher. Eighty-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 159–184). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65. Vickers, D. (1991). Report of student performance 1990–1991. Writing, Grades 6 and 8.
66. Warren, L., & Fitzgerald, J. (1997). Helping parents to read expository literature to their children: Promoting main-idea and detail understanding. Reading Research and Instruction, 36, 341–360.
67. Wertsch, J. V., & Toma, C. (1995). Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 159–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. White, E. M. (1985). Teaching and assessing writing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69. Witte, S. F. (1983). Topical structure and revision: An explanatory study. College Composition and Communication, 34, 313–342.
70. Zanias, G. S. (1996). The effect of supplementary entries on reading comprehension tests in college level developmental reading classes. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Kean College, Union, NJ.