Reaching a verdict

Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 307-333

  Green, David W ^a   McCloy, Rachel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242595636     PISSN: 13546783     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1354678034000268     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Bailenson, J., & Rips, L. J. (1996). Informal reasoning and the burden of proof. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, S3-S16.
2. Baron, J. (1995). Myside bias in thinking about abortion. Thinking & Reasoning, 1, 221-235.
3. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bohner, G., Rank, S., Reinhard, M-A., Einwiller, S., & Erb, H-P. (1998). Motivational determinants of systematic processing: Expectancy moderates effects of desired confidence on processing effort. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 185-206.
5. Brem, S. K., & Rips, L. J. (2000). Explanation and evidence in informal argument. Cognitive Science, 24, 573-604.
6. Byrne, R. M. J., & Tasso, A. (1999). Deductive reasoning with factual, possible and counterfactual conditionals. Memory and Cognition, 27, 726-740.
7. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
8. Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the foregone: Why value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360-370.
9. De Kleer, J., & Brown, J. S. (1983). Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistic mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 155-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
10. Doherty, M. E., Chadwick, R., Garavan, H., Barr, D., & Mynatt, C. R. (1996). On people's understanding of the diagnostic implications of probabilistic data. Memory and Cognition, 24, 644-654.
11. Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S., Perham, N., Over, D. E., & Thompson, V. A. (2000). Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems. Cognition, 77, 197-213.
12. Evans, J. St. B. T., Venn, S., & Feeney, A. (2002). Implicit and explicit processes in a hypothesis testing task. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 31-46.
13. Feibleman, J. K. (1960). An introduction to Peirce's philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.
14. Fillenbaum, S. (1974). Information amplified: Memory for counterfactual conditionals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 44-49.
15. Fox, J. (1994). On the necessity of probability: Reasons to believe and grounds for doubt. G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 75-103). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2001). Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: A matter of information structure and question form. Cognition, 78, 242-276.
17. Goldvarg, Y., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Naive causality: A mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25, 565-610.
18. Green, D. W. (1994). Induction: Representation, strategy and argument. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, 45-50.
19. Green, D. W. (1996). Models, arguments and decisions. In J. Oakhill & A. Garnham (Eds.), Mental models in cognitive science: A Festschrift for Philip Johnson-Laird (pp. 119-137). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
20. Green, D. W. (2000). Argument and opinion. In J. García-Madruga, N. Carriedo, & M. J. González-Labra (Eds.), Mental models in reasoning (pp. 57-67). Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
21. Green, D. W. (2001a). Understanding microworlds. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 879-901.
22. Green, D. W. (2001b). A mental model theory of informal argument. Paper presented to the Workshop on The mental models theory of reasoning: Refinements and extensions. Brussels.
23. Green, D. W., McClelland, A., Muckli, L., & Simmons, C. (1999). Arguments and deontic decisions. Acta Psychologica, 101, 27-47.
24. Green, D. W., & McManus, I. C. (1995). Cognitive structural models: Perception of risk and prevention in coronary heart disease. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 321-336.
25. Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 411-435.
26. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1-55.
27. Hogarth, R. M., & Kunreuther, H. (1995). Decision making under ignorance: Arguing with yourself. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 10, 15-16.
28. Holyoak, K. J., & Simon, D. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 3-31.
29. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991) Deduction. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
31. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, P., Legrenzi, M. S., & Caverni, J-P. (1999). Naïve probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106, 62-88.
32. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M., & Flaton, R. (1994). How well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of individual variation in a juror reasoning task. Psychological Science, 5, 289-296.
35. Lipshitz, R. (1993). Decision-making as argument-driven action. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, & R. Calderwood (Eds.), Decision-making in action: models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
36. Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231-1241.
37. McCloy, R., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Semifactual "even if" thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 41-67.
38. McKenzie, C. R. M. (1999). (Non)complementary updating of belief in two hypotheses. Memory and Cognition, 27, 152-165.
39. Moshman, D., & Geil, M. (1998). Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Thinking & Reasoning, 4, 231-248.
40. Oatley, K. K. G. (1996). Emotions, rationality and informal reasoning. In J. Oakhill & A. Garnham (Eds.), Mental models in cognitive science: A Festschrift for Philip Johnson-Laird (pp. 175-196). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
41. Oestermeier, U., & Hesse, F. W. (2000). Verbal and visual causal arguments. Cognition, 75, 65-104.
42. Osherson, D., Smith, E. E., Wilkie, O., Lopez, A., & Shafir, E. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 185-200.
43. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decision-making. Cognition, 49, 123-163.
44. Petty, R. E., Priestner, J. R., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Cognitive processes in attitudinal change. In R. S. Wyer Jr & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 69-142). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
45. Poletiek, F. (2001). Hypothesis-testing behaviour. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
46. Popper, K. R. (1963/1978). Conjectures and refutations (4th ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
47. Rips, L. R. (1999). Reasoning and conversation. Psychological Review, 105, 411-441.
48. Schlesinger, I. M., Keren-Portnoy, T., & Parush, T. (2001). The structure of arguments. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
49. Schum, D. A., & Martin, A. W. (1982). Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence. Law and Society Review, 17, 105-151.
50. Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49, 11-36.
51. Shaw, V. (1996). The cognitive processes in informal reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 51-80.
52. Simon, D., Pham, L. B., Le, Q. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (2001) The emergence of coherence over the course of decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 1250-1260.
53. Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L., & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountabilitiy: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 632-640.
54. Torrens, D., Thompson, V. A., & Cramer, K. M. (1999). Individual differences and the belief bias effect: Mental models, logical necessity, and abstract reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 5, 1-28.
55. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
57. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendurst, R., Henkemans, F. S., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., Krabbe, E. C. W., et al. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
58. Voss, J. F., & Means, M. L. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and Instruction, 1, 337-350.
59. Williams, M. D., Hollan, J. D., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). Human reasoning about a simple physical system. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 131-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.