Two Psychologies: Cognitive versus Contingency-Oriented

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 695-709

  Mey, Hubert R a ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

behavior analysis; clinical psychology; cognitive psychology; contingency; explanation; relational frame theory; selectionism

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242592969     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: 14617447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/09593543030135010     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Anderson, C.M., Hawkins, R.P., & Scotti, J.R. (1997). Private events in behavior analysis: Conceptual basis and clinical relevance. Behavior Therapy, 28, 157–179.
2. Baars, B.J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.
5. Barnes, D., & Hampson, P.J. (1993). Stimulus equivalence and connectionism:Implications for behavior analysis and cognitive science. The Psychological Record, 43, 617–638.
6. Barnes-Holmes, D. (2000). Behavioral pragmatism: No place for reality and truth.The Behavior Analyst, 23, 191–202.
7. Beck, A.T. (1991). Cognitive therapy: A 30-year retrospective. AmericanPsychologist, 46, 368–375.
8. Biglan, A., & Hayes, S.C. (1996). Should the behavioral sciences become more pragmatic? The case for functional contextualism in research on human behavior. Applied and PreventivePsychology, 5, 47–57.
9. Bolton, N. (1991). Cognitivism: A phenomenological critique. In A. Still & A. Costall (Eds.), Against cognitivism: Alternative foundations for cognitive psychology(pp. 104–121). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
10. de Mey, H.R.A. (1988). Het begrip contingentie in de functionele analyse van gedrag [The concept of contingency in the functional analysis of behavior]. Gedragstherapie, 21, 217–234.
11. de Mey, H.R.A. (1990). de psychologie binnenstebuiten [Psychology inside out].De Psycholoog, 25, 219–221
12. de Mey, H.R.A. (2001). Nieuwe ontwikkelingen in de gedragsanalyse na(ar)Skinner [New developments in behavior analysis ‘after’ Skinner]. Gedragstherapie, 34, 133–152.
13. Delprato, D.J., & Midgley, B.D. (1992). Some fundamentals of B.F. Skinner's behaviorism. American Psychologist, 47, 1507–1520.
14. Dennett, D.C. (1978). Current issues in the philosophy of mind. AmericanPhilosophical Quarterly, 15, 249–261.
15. Dennett, D.C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. London: Penguin.
16. Ellis, A. (1999). How to make yourself happy and remarkably less disturbable. Atascadero, CA: Impact.
17. Fodor, J.A. (1981). The mind–body problem. Scientific American, 1, 124–132.
18. Gifford, E.V., & Hayes, S.C. (1999). Functional contextualism: A pragmatic philosophy for behavioral science. In W. O'Donohue & R. Kitchener (Eds.), Handbook of behaviorism(pp. 285–327). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Glenn, S.S. (1991). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Relations among behavioral, cultural, and biological evolution. In P.A. Lamal (Ed.), Behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices(pp. 39–73). New York: Hemisphere.
20. Hawkins, R.M.F. (1992). Self-efficacy: a predictor but not a cause of behavior.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 23, 251–256.
21. Hayes, S.C. (1986). The case of the silent dog–Verbal reports and the analysis of rules: A review of Ericsson and Simon's protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351–363.
22. Hayes, S.C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events.In S.C.Hayes, L.J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition(pp. 9–30). Reno, NV: Context.
23. Hayes, S.C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory:A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
24. Hayes, S.C., & Brownstein, A.J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior–behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175–190.
25. Hayes, S.C., Hayes, L.J., Sato, M., & Ono, K. (Eds.). (1994). Behavior analysis of language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context.
26. Hempel, C.G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.
27. Herz, N. (2001). The silent takeover: Global capitalism and the death of democracy. London: Heinemann.
28. Hull, C.L. (1952). A behavior system. New Have, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Hull, D.L. (2001). Science and selection: Essays on biological evolution and the philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hyland, M. (1981). Introduction to theoretical psychology. London: Macmillan.
31. Johnston, J.M., & Pennypacker, H.S. (1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Kennedy, C.H., & Laitinen, R. (1988). Second-order conditional control of symmetric andtransitive stimulus relations: The influence of order effects. The Psychological Record, 38, 437–446.
33. Lee, C. (1998). Alternatives to cognition: A new look at explaining social behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Margolis, J. (1984). Philosophy of psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.
35. Marr, J. (1997). Infants’ feats of inference: A commentary on Bower and Watson.TheBehavior Analyst, 20, 155–159.
36. Moore, J. (1996). On the relation between behaviorism and cognitive psychology.Journal of Mind and Behavior, 17, 345–368.
37. Moore, J. (1998). On behaviorism, theories, and hypothetical constructs. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 19, 215–242.
38. Morris, E.K. (1988). Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 289–323.
39. Morris, E.K. (1992). The aim, progress, and evolution of behavior analysis. TheBehavior Analyst, 15, 3–29.
40. O'Donohue, W.T., Callaghan, G.M., & Ruckstuhl, L.E. (1998). Epistemological barriers to radical behaviorism. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 307–320.
41. Pepper, S.C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42. Pervin, L.A. (1984). Personality: Theory and research(4th ed.). New York:Wiley.
43. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London:Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
44. Prilleltensky, I. (1990). On the social and political implications of cognitive psychology.Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11, 127–136.
45. Prilleltensky, I. (1994). The morals and politics of psychology: Psychological discourseand the status quo. Albany: State University of New York Press.
46. Reese, H.W. (1996). How is physiology relevant to behavior analysis? The BehaviorAnalyst, 19, 61–70.
47. Rosenberg, A. (2000). Philosophy of science: A contemporary introduction. London:Routledge.
48. Schnaitter, R. (1986). Behavior as a function of inner states and outer circumstances.In T.Thompson & M.D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units(pp. 247–274). London: Erlbaum.
49. Schnaitter, R. (1999). Some criticisms of behaviorism. In B.A. Thyer (Ed.), The philosophical legacy of behaviorism(pp. 209–249). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
50. Schneider, S.M., & Morris, E.K. (1987). A history of the term radical behaviorism:From Watson to Skinner. The Behavior Analyst, 10(1), 27–39.
51. Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson& M.D.Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units(pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA:Authors Cooperative.
53. Skinner, B.F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
54. Skinner, B.F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
55. Skinner, B.F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.
56. Skinner, B.F. (1990). Can psychology be a science of mind? American Psychologist,45, 1206–1210.
57. Taylor, I., & O'Reilly, M.F. (1997). Private events: A neglected and misunderstood construct in radical behaviourism. In K. Dillenburger, M.F. O'Reilly, & M. Keenan (Eds.), Advances in behaviour analysis(pp. 23–45). Dublin: University College Dublin Press.
58. van den Hout, M. (1999). Armies of idiots and idiosyncrasies: On reductions in experimentalpsychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, S135–S145.
59. Vossen, J.M.H. (2000). Twee disciplines op ¥e¥en kussen[Two disciplines on one pillow]. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information.
60. White, E. (1992). The end of the empty organism: Neurobiology and the sciences of human action. Westport, CT: Praeger.
61. Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, CA: StanfordUniversity Press.
62. Wulfert, E., Greenway, D.E., & Dougher, M.J. (1994). Third-order equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 44, 411–439.
63. Zettle, R.D. (1990). Rule-governed behavior: A radical behavioral answer to the cognitive challenge. The Psychological Record, 40, 41–49.
64. Zuriff, G.E. (1979). Ten inner causes. Behaviorism, 7, 1–8.