Correlation effects of carbon nanotubes at boundaries: Spin polarization induced by zero-energy boundary states

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 16, 2003, Pages

  Ryu, Shinsei ^a   Hatsugai, Yasuhiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; METAL;

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENERGY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PHYSICS; POLARIZATION; THEORY;

EID: 0242586976     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.165410     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. N. Hamada, S. Sawada, and A. Oshiyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1579 (1992).
2. R. Saito, M. Fujita, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 2204 (1992).
3. J. W. Mintmire, B. I. Dunlap, and C. T. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 631 (1992).
4. M. Fujita, K. Wakabayashi, K. Nakada, and K. Kusakabe, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 1920 (1996).
5. S. Ryu and Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002).
6. K. Wakabayashi, M. Fujita, H. Ajiki, and M. Sigrist, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8271 (1999).
7. K. Wakabayashi and M. Sigrist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3390 (2000).
8. K. Wakabayashi, Phys. Rev. B 64, 125428 (2001).
9. K. Wakabayashi, M. Sigrist, and M. Fujita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 2089 (1998).
10. S. Okada and A. Oshiyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 146803 (2001).
11. T. Hikihara, X. Hu, H. H. Lin, and C. Y. Mou, cond-mat/0303159 (unpublished).
12. K. Nakada, M. Igami, and M. Fujita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 2388 (1998).
13. M. Fujita, M. Igami, and K. Nakada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 1894 (1997).
14. Y. L. Lee and Y. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. 66, 245402 (2002).
15. R. Egger and A. O. Gogolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5082 (1997).
16. R. Egger and A. O. Gogolin, Eur. Phys. J. B 3, 281 (1998).
17. H. Yoshioka and A. A. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 374 (1999).
18. A. A. Odintsov and H. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. B 59, R10457 (1999).
19. Y. A. Krotov, D. H. Lee, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4245 (1997).
20. L. Balents and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 55, R11973 (1997).
21. H. H. Lin, Phys. Rev. B 58, 4963 (1998).
22. C. Kane, L. Balents, and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5086 (1997).
23. M. Bockrath, D. H. Cobden, J. Lu, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smalley, L. Balents, and P. L. McEuen, Nature (London) 397, 598 (1999).
24. C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1220 (1992);
25. C. L. KaneM. P. A. FisherPhys. Rev. B 46, 15 233 (1992).
26. S. Eggert and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B 46, 10 866 (1992).
27. A. Furusaki and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. B 47, 4631 (1993).
28. E. Wang and I. Affleck, Nucl. Phys. B 417, 403 (1994).
29. M. Fabrizio and A. O. Gogolin, Phys. Rev. B 51, 17 827 (1995).
30. H. Yoshioka and Y. Okamura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 2512 (2002).
31. H. Yoshioka (unpublished).
32. K. Kusakabe and M. Maruyama, cond-mat/0212391 (unpublished).
33. Q. Si and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 48, 13 881 (1993).
34. K. D. Schotte and U. Schotte, Phys. Rev. 182, 479 (1969).
35. Although superconducting pairing operators (Formula presented) (Formula presented) do not affect the global features of the RG flows, they can renormalize couplings (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) at (Formula presented) which might result in a different conclusion, e.g., (Formula presented) We derived RG equations including the effects of (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) to check that this does not occur.
36. X. Blase, L. X. Benedict, E. L. Shirley, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1878 (1994).
37. Z. M. Li, Z. K. Tang, H. J. Liu, N. Wang, C. T. Chan, R. Saito, S. Okada, G. D. Li, J. S. Chen, N. Nagasawa, and S. Tsuda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 127401 (2001).