Three Varieties of Realism in Computer Graphics

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5007, Issue , 2003, Pages 290-297

  Ferwerda, James A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Computer graphics; Human vision; Realism; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; VISION;

FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCE PREDICTORS (FDP);

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 0242581608     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.473899     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. ARTHUR, W., BOOTH, K.S., AND WARE, C. (1993). Evaluating 3D task performance for fish tank virtual worlds. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11(3), 239-265.
2. BOLIN, M. AND MEYER, G. (1998). A perceptually-based adaptive sampling algorithm. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1998, 299-309.
3. DECARLO, D. AND SANTELLA, A. (2002). Stylization and abstraction of photographs. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002, 769-776.
4. DALY, S. (1993). The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In (Watson, A.B., Ed.) Digital Images and Human Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 179-206.
5. FEINER, S, MACKINLAY, J., BLINN, J, GREENBERG, D., AND HAGEN, M. (1988). Designing effective pictures: Is photographic realism the only answer? Panel transcript. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1988, 1-24.
6. Fu, S. (2001). Thanks to Suanne Fu for rendering "The Treason of Image Synthesis". Program of Computer Graphics, Cornell University.
7. GERSHON, N. BRAHAM, R., FRACCHIA, D., GLASSNER, A., MONES-HATTAL, B., AND ROSE, R. (1996). Breaking the myth: one picture is NOT (always) worth a thousand words. Panel transcript. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, 491.
8. GOOCH, B., SLOAN, P., GOOCH A., SHIRLEY, P., AND RIESENFELD, R. (1999). Interactive technical illustration. Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 31-38.
9. HAGEN, M. (1986). Varieties of Realism. Cambridge University Press.
10. Hu, H., GOOCH, A.A., THOMPSON, W.B. SMITS, B.E. REISER J.J. AND SHIRLEY, P. (2000). Visual cues for imminent object contact in realistic virtual environments. Proceedings IEEE Visualization 2000.
11. HUBONA, G.S., WHEELER, P.N., SHIRAH, G.W., BRANDT, M. (1999). The relative contributions of stereo, lighting, and background scenes in promoting 3D depth visualization.. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(3), 214-242.
12. HUNT, F.Y., MARX, E., MEYER, G.W., VORBURGER, P.A. AND WESTLUND, H.B. (2001). First steps toward photorealistic rendering of coated surfaces and computer based standards of appearance. In Service Life Methodology and Metrology (J.W. Martin, Ed.). Oxford University Press. 1-10.
13. KNILL D.C. AND RICHARDS. (1996). Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge University Press.
14. LANDY, M.S. AND MALONEY, L.T. (1990). A statistical framework for the combination of consonant depth cues. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.), 31, 173.
15. LUBIN, J. (1993). A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation. In (Peli, E., Ed.) Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition. World Scientific, New Jersey, 245-283.
16. MYSZKOWSKI, K., TAWARA, T, AKAMINE, H. AND SEIDEL, H.P (2001). Perception-guided global illumination solution for animation rendering. Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2001, 221-230.
17. PELLACINI, F. AND FERWERDA, J.A. (2002). FDPs: Functional difference predictors: measuring meaningful image differences. Technical Report 2002-04, Program of Computer Graphics, Cornell University.
18. READER's DIGEST (1973). The Reader 's Digest Complete Do-It-Yourself Manual. Reader's Digest Association.
19. REINHARD, E., STARK, M., SHIRLEY, P., AND FERWERDA, J.A. (2002). Photographic tone-reproduction for digital images. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002, 267-276.
20. RODGER, J.C. AND BROWSE R.A. (2000). Choosing rendering parameters for the effective communication of 3D shape. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20(2), 20-28.
21. SAITO. T. AND TAKAHASHI, T. (1990). Comprehensible rendering of 3-D shapes. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1990, 197-206.
22. SCHRATER, P AND KERSTEN, D. (2000). How optimal depth cue integration depends on the task. International Journal of Computer Vision, 40, 73-91.
23. SELIGMANN, D. AND FEINER, S. (1991). Automated generation of intent-based 3D illustrations. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1991, 123-132.
24. STROTHOTTE, T. AND SCHLECTWEG, S. (2002). Non-Photorealistic Computer Graphics: Modeling, Rendering, and Animation. Morgan-Kaufman, San Francisco, USA.
25. WANGER, L.R., FERWERDA, J.A. AND GREENBERG. D.P. (1992). Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 12(3), 44-58.
26. WARD. G. (1994). The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1994, 459-472.
27. YEE, H., PATTANAIK, S.N. AND GREENBERG, D.P. (2001). Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 20(1), 39-65.