Dipolar foams in Langmuir monolayers dry at low bubble fraction

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 107, Issue 42, 2003, Pages 11757-11762

  Heinig, P ^a   Fischer, T M ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF COLLOIDS AND INTERFACES   (Germany)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; FREE ENERGY; ITERATIVE METHODS; MONOLAYERS; ORGANIC ACIDS; SURFACE TENSION; THERMODYNAMIC STABILITY;

LANGMUIR MONOLAYER; MYRISTIC ACID; PENTADECANOIC ACID; THERMODYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM; YOUNG LAPLACE EQUATION;

FOAMS;

EID: 0242573651     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp0274839     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Glazier, J. A.; Weaire, D. J. Phys: Condensed Matter 1992, 4, 1867.
2. Lösche, M.; Sackmann, E.; Möhwald, H. Ber. Bunsen-Ges., Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 848.
3. Berge, B.; Simon, A. J. Libchaber, A. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 41, 6893.
4. Stine, K. J.; Bono, M.F.; Kretzer, J.S. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1994, 162, 320.
5. Dennin, M.; Knobler, C.M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 78, 2485.
6. Mann, E. K.; Primak, V. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 5397.
7. Demchak, R. J.; Fort, T., Jr. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1973, 46, 191.
8. Kwon-On, Ng, Vanderbilt, D. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 52, 2177.
9. McConnell, H. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1989, 86, 3452.
10. de Koker, R.; McConnell, H. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 13419.
11. Wurlitzer, S.; Schmiedel, H.; Fischer, Th.M. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 10877.
12. Princen, H. M. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1979, 71, 55.
13. Kermode, J. P.; Weaire, D. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1990, 60, 75.
14. Bolton, F.; Weaire, D. Philos. Mag. B 1992, 65, 473.
15. Hutzler, S.; Weaire, D. The Physics of Foams; Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K., 1999.
16. Graner, F.; Jiang, Y.; Flament, C. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 63, 011402.
17. Riviére, S.; Henon, S.; Meunier, J.; Albrecht, G.; Boissonade, M.M.; Baszkin, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 2506.
18. Heinig, P.; Steffen, P.; Wurlitzer, S.; Fischer, Th.M. Langmuir 2001, 17, 6633.
19. McConnell, H.M. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1991, 42, 171.
20. Seul, M.; Andelman, D. Science 1995, 267, 476.
21. Hurley, M. M.; Singer, S. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 1938.
22. Heinig, P.; Wurlitzer, S.; John, Th.; Fischer, Th. M. J. Phys. Chem. 2002, 106, 11951.
23. Elias, F.; Flament, C.; Bacri, J.-C.; Neveu, S. J. Phys. I Fr. 1997, 7, 711.
24. -3
25. Data taken from Figure 3 in ref 3: The bubble area in Figure 3e φ ≈ 0.67 is approximately 4 times as large as that in Figure 3c (φ ≈ 0.4). Assuming size equilibrium (Figure 4 of the present paper and ref 11), the predicted area is A(φ=0.67) ≈ 3.7A(φ=0.4).
26. Elias, F.; Flament, C.; Bacri, J.-C.; Cardoso, O.; Graner, F. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 56, 3310.