Picture-word matching: Flexibility in conceptual memory and pupillary responses

Psychophysiology

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 904-913

  Van Der Meer, Elke ^a   Friedrich, Manuela ^b   Nuthmann, Antje ^a   Stelzel, Christine ^a   Kuchinke, Lars ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Amodal representation; Concepts; Dual code theory; Pupillary response

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONALITY TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PUPIL; PUPIL REFLEX; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 0242556810     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00108     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. Ahn, W.-K. (1999). Effect of causal structure on category construction. Memory & Cognition, 27, 1008-1023.
2. Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: Norton.
3. Bajo, M. T. (1988). Semantic facilitation with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 579-589.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structures in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 114, 629-649.
5. Barsalou, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101-140). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responsees, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 276-292.
7. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133.
8. Clark, J. M., & Johnson, C. J. (1994). Retrieval mechanisms in the development of instance and superordinate naming of pictures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 295-326.
9. Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2001). Meaning and modality: Influence of context, semantic memory organization, and perceptual predictability on picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 202-224.
10. Ganis, G., Kutas, M., & Sereno, M. (1996). The search for "Common Sense": An electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 89-106.
11. Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1986). Young children's inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearance. Child Development, 58, 1532-1541.
12. Glaser, W. R. (1992). Picture naming. Cognition, 42, 61-105.
13. Goede, K., & Friedrich, M. (1995). Roses but not flowers - Phenomena of the development and the naming of concepts. In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Papers from the Dutch-German Colloquium on Language Acquisition, 66, 41-63.
14. Granholm, E., Asarnow, R., Sarkin, A., & Dykes, K. L. (1996). Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. Psychophysiology, 33, 457-461.
15. Hampton, J., & Dubois, D. (1993). Psychological models of concepts: Introduction. In I. van Mechtelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concept: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis (pp. 11-22). London: Academic Press.
16. Hirshman, E., Snodgrass, J. G., Mindes, J., & Feenan, K. (1990). Conceptual priming in fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Pxvchology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 634-647.
17. Hoeks, B., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). Pupillary dilation as a measure of attention: A quantitative system analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 16-26.
18. Hoffmann, J., & Klimesch, W. (1984). Die semantische Codierung von Wörtern und Bildern [Semantic coding of words and pictures]. Sprache und Kognition, 1, 1-25.
19. Hoffmann, J., & Zießler, M. (1982). Begriffe und ihre Merkmale [Concepts and their features]. Zeitschft für Psychologie, 190, 46-77.
20. Hyönä, J., Tommola, J., & Alaja, A.-M. (1995). Pupil dilation as a measure of processing load in simultaneous interpretation and other language tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 598-612.
21. Jescheniak, J., & Levelt, W. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843.
22. Johnson, C. J., Paivio, A., & Clark, J. M. (1996). Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 113-139.
23. Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M. A., & Kosslyn, S. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243-275.
24. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1993). The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 310-339.
25. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Kiefer, M. (2001). Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Memory & Cognition, 29, 100-116.
27. Klix, F., van der Meer, E., & Preuß, M. (1984). Semantische Relationen - Erkennungsaufwand und psychophysiologische Reaktionstendenzen [Semantic relations - Processing load and psychophysiological responses]. In F. Klix (Ed.), Gedächtnis - Wissen - Wissensnutzung [Memory - Knowledge - Knowledge Application] (pp. 156-172). Berlin: DVW.
28. Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic priming: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 804-823.
29. Kroll, J. F., & Potter, M. C. (1984). Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 39-66.
30. Krüger, F. (2000). Coding of temporal relations in semantic memory: Cognitive load and task-evoked pupillary response. Berlin: Waxmann.
31. Lachman, R., & Lachman, J. L. (1980). Picture naming: Retrieval and activation of long-term memory. In L. W. Poon, J. L. Fozard, L. S. Cermak, D. Grenberg, & L. W. Thompson (Eds.), New directions in memory and aging (pp. 313-343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. La Heij, W., Dirkx, J., & Kramer, P. (1990). Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 511-525.
33. Lupker, S. J., & Katz, A. N. (1981). Input, decision, and response factors in picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Leraning and Memory, 7, 269-282.
34. Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorizing and naming in children. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179-196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Medin, D. L., & Shoben, E. J. (1988). Context and structure in conceptual combination. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 158-190.
37. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
38. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
39. Pellegrino, J., Rosinski, R., Chiesi, H., & Siegel, A. (1977). Picture-word differences in decision latency: An analysis of single and dual memory models. Memory and Cognition, 5, 383-396.
40. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Coltheart, M., & Funnell, E. (1988). Semantic systems or system? Neuropsychological evidence re-examined. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 3-25.
41. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
42. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
44. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
45. Schluroff, M., Zimmermann, T. E., Freeman, R. B., Hofmeister, K., Lorscheid, T., & Weber, A. (1986). Pupillary response to syntactic ambiguity of sentences. Brain and Language, 27, 322-344.
46. Seymour, P. H. K. (1973). A model for reading, naming, and comparison. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 35-49.
47. Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Snodgrass, J. G. (1984). Concepts and their surface representations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 3-22.
49. Spalding, T. L., & Murphy, G. L. (1996). Effects of background knowledge on category construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 525-538.
50. Theios, J., & Amrhein, P. C. (1989). Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. Psychological Research, 96, 5-24.
51. Verney, S. P., Granholm, E., & Dionisio, D. P. (2001). Pupillary responses and processing resources on the visual backward masking task. Psychophysiology, 38, 76-83.
52. Wales, R., Coleman, M., & Pattison, P. (1983). How a thing is called - A study of mothers' and childrens' naming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 1-17.
53. White, T. G. (1982). Naming practices, typicality, and underextension in child language. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 324-346.
54. Zimmer, K. (1984). Ansätze der psychophysiologischen Indikation von Wissensrepräsentationen: Die Pupillomotorik als sensibler Indikator semantischer Informationsverarbeitungsaktivität [Psychophysiological accounts of knowledge representation: Pupillary responses as indices of semantic information processing]. In F. Klix (Ed.), Gedächtnis - Wissen - Wissensnutzung [Memory - Knowledge - Knowledge Application] (pp. 137-155). Berlin: DVW.