Why we need an explicit forum for negative results - Announcement of the forum for negative results (FNR)

Journal of Universal Computer Science

Volumn 3, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 1074-1083

  Prechelt, Lutz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Failures; FNR; Forum; Negative results; Progress; Research culture

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242544181     PISSN: 0958695X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. [Brooks 1996] Fred P. Brooks. The computer scientist as toolsmith II. Communications of the ACM, 39(3):61-68, March 1996.
2. [Dennis 1980] Jack B. Dennis. Data flow supercomputers. IEEE Computer, 13:48-56, November 1980.
3. [Fenton et al. 1994] Norman Fenton, Shari Lawrence Pfleeger, and Robert L. Glass. Science and substance: A challenge to the software engineering community. IEEE Software, 11(4):86-95, July 1994.
4. [Hwang and Briggs 1984] Kai Hwang and Fayé A. Briggs. Computer Architecture and Parallel Processing. McGraw-Hill, 1984.
5. [Iannucci 1990] Robert A. Iannucci. Parallel Machines: Parallel Machine Languages: The Emergence of Hybrid Dataflow Computer Architectures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
6. [Prechelt 1996] Lutz Prechelt. A quantitative study of experimental evaluations of neural network learning algorithms: Current research practice. Neural Networks, 9(3):457-462, April 1996.
7. [Salzberg 1997] Steven L. Salzberg. On comparing classifiers: Pitfalls to avoid and a recommended approach. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(3), 1997.
8. [Tichy et al. 1995] Walter F. Tichy, Paul Lukowicz, Lutz Prechelt, and Ernst A. Heinz. Experimental evaluation in computer science: A quantitative study. Journal of Systems and Software, 28(1):9-18, January 1995. Also as TR 17/94 (August 1994), Fakultät für Informatik, Universität Karlsruhe, Germany, ftp.ira.uka.de.