Designing the lattice for log-polar images

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2886, Issue , 2003, Pages 164-173

  Traver, V Javier ^a   Pla, Filiberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

Design criteria; Log polar transform; Receptive fields

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HARDWARE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECONFIGURABLE HARDWARE;

ACTIVE VISION; CARTESIAN IMAGE; DESIGN CRITERIA; LOG-POLAR TRANSFORM; RECEPTIVE FIELDS; RETINA-LIKE SENSOR; SIMULATION SOFTWARE; TECHNOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS;

DESIGN;

EID: 0242543797     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39966-7_15     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. R. Alan Peters II, M. Bishay, and T. Rogers. On the computation of the log-polar transform. Technical report, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Mar. 1996. http://www.vuse.vanderbilt.edu/∼rap2/papers/oncomplp.pdf.
2. A. Bernardino and J. Santos-Victor. Sensor geometry for dynamic vergence: Characterization and performance analysis. In Workshop on Performance Characteristics of Vision Algorithms, ECCV, 1996. (Also as TR 01/96 at VisLab, Lisbon, Portugal).
3. A. Bernardino and J. Santos-Victor. Visual behaviors for binocular tracking. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 25:137-146, 1998.
4. M. Bolduc and M. D. Levine. A review of biologically motivated space-variant data reduction models for robotic vision. Computer Vision and Image Understanding (CVIU), 69(2):170-184, Feb. 1998.
5. J. R. del Solar, C. Nowack, and B. Schneider. VIPOL: A virtual polar-logarithmic sensor. In Scandinavian Conf. on Image Analysis (SCIA), pages 739-744, Finland, 1997.
6. J. V. der Spiegel, G. Kreider, C. Claeys, I. Debusschere, G. Sandini, P. Dario, F. Fantini, P. Belluti, and G. Soncini. A foveated retina-like sensor using CCD technology. In C. Mead and M. Ismail, editors, Analog VLSI and Neural Network Implementations, Boston, 1989. DeKluwer Publ.
7. T. E. Fisher and R. D. Juday. A programmable video image remapper. In SPIE Conf. on Pattern Recognition and Signal Processing, volume 938 (Digital and Optical Shape Representation and Pattern Recognition), pages 122-128, 1988.
8. F. Jurie. A new log-polar mapping for space variant imaging. Application to face detection and tracking. Pattern Recognition, 32:865-875, 1999.
9. F. Pardo, J. A. Boluda, J. J. Pérez, B. Dierickx, and D. Scheffer. Design issues on CMOS space-variant image sensors. In SPIE Conf. on Advanced Focal Plane Arrays and Electronic Cameras (AFPAEC), Berlin, Germany, Oct. 1996.
10. A. S. Rojer and E. L. Schwartz. Design considerations for a space-variant visual sensor with complex-logarithmic geometry. In Intl. Conf. on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pages 278-285, 1990.
11. G. Sandini, P. Questa, D. Scheffer, B. Dierickx, and A. Mannucci. A retina-like CMOS sensor and its applications. In Proc. 1st. IEEE SAM Workshop, Cambridge, USA, Mar. 2000.
12. E. L. Schwartz. Spatial mapping in the primate sensory projection: Analytic structure and relevance to perception. Biological Cybernetics, 25:181-194, 1977.
13. V. J. Traver. Motion Estimation Algorithms in Log-polar Images and Application to Monocular Active Tracking. PhD thesis, Dep. Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain), Sept. 2002.
14. C. F. R. Weiman. Exponential sensor array geometry and simulation. In Preprint from the Proc. of SPIE, Orlando, Florida, Apr. 1988. Vol. 938 (Digital and Optical Shape Representation and Pattern Recognition).
15. C. F. R. Weiman. Log-polar binocular vision system. NASA Phase II SBIR Final Report, Dec. 1994.
16. J. C. Wilson and R. M. Hodgson. Log-polar mapping applied to pattern representation and recognition. Computer Vision and Image Processing, pages 245-277, 1992.
17. R. Wodnicki, G. W. Roberts, and M. D. Levine. A foveated image sensor in standard CMOS technology. In Custom Integrated Circuits Conf., Santa Clara, May 1995.