"Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand" questionnaire to identify diagnosis-specific activity profiles;Der "disability of shoulder, arms and hand"-fragebogen als instrument zur identifikation diagnosespezifischer aktivitätsprofile

Unfallchirurg

Volumn 106, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 834-838

  Jester, A ^a   Harth, A ^a   Wind, G ^a   Germann, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

DASH; Evaluation; Individual profiles; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; DISABILITY; GERMANY; HAND; PROGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; SHOULDER;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ARTHRODESIS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FINGER INJURIES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUNATE BONE; MOTOR SKILLS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PSEUDARTHROSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCAPHOID BONE; WRIST JOINT;

EID: 0242521438     PISSN: 01775537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00113-003-0632-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Amadio PC (1997) Outcomes assessment in hand surgery. What's new? Clin Plast Surg 24:191-194
2. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A (2000) The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71:613-618
3. Bialocerkowski AE, Grimmer KA, Bain GI (2000) A systematic review of the content and quality of wrist outcome instruments. Int J Qual Health Care 12:149-157
4. Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 41:1359-1366
5. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA (1998) Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 23:575-587
6. Dias JJ, Bhowal B, Wildin CJ, Thompson JR (2001) Assessing the outcome of disorders of the hand. Is the patient evaluation measure reliable, valid, responsive and without bias? J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:235-240
7. Donabedian (1983) Quality, cost and clinical decision. AAPSS 468:106-114
8. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602-608
9. Hudak PL, Wright JG (2000) The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 25:3167-3177
10. Krimmer H, Wiemer P, Kalb K (2000) Comparative outcome assessment of the wrist joint - mediocarpal partial arthrodesis and total arthrodesis. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 32:369-374
11. MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH (1998) Patient 〈p〉rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma 12:577-586
12. Martini A (1999) Bewertungsschemata zur Beurteilung des Handgelenkes. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 31: 153-154
13. Navsarikar A, Gladman DD, Husted JA, Cook RJ (1999) Validity assessment of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) for patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 26:2191-2194
14. Rudolf KD, Preisser P, Partecke BD (1999) Vergleich verschiedener Bewertungsmaßstäbe zu Beurteilung des Behandlungserfolges nach Kahnbeinfrakturen. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 31:155-161
15. Sauerbier M, Kluge S, Bickert B, Germann G (2000) Subjective and objective outcomes after total wrist arthrodesis in patients with radiocarpal arthrosis or Kienbock's disease. Chir Main 19:223-231