Human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1121-1122

  Van Wely, Madelon ^a   Westergaard, Lars G ^b,c   Bossuyt, Patrick M M ^a   Van Der Veen, Fulco ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c Trianglen Fertility Clinic   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DRUG COST; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; META ANALYSIS; OVARY CYCLE; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0242493148     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02190-3     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Van Wely M, Westergaard LG, Bossuyt PMM, van der Veen F. Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle stimulation hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive cycles (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2003. Oxford (UK): Update Software, 2003.
2. Daya S. Methodologic pitfalls in assessing the efficacy of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropin in assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 80:2003;1100-1104.
3. Kelly E. Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone versus urinary-derived human menopausal gonadotropin for controlled ovarian stimulation: the science and art of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 80:2003;1105-1107.
4. Filicori M., Cognigni G.E., Pocognoli P., Ciampaglia W. Choice of ovarian stimulation regimens in assisted reproduction: finding the thread in the gonadotropin maze. Fertil Steril. 80:2003;1114-1116.
5. Collins J. A turbulent arena. Fertil Steril. 80:2003;1117-1120.