Evidence for Surviving Outer Hair Cell Function in Congenitally Deaf Ears

Laryngoscope

Volumn 113, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 2030-2034

  Rea, Peter A ^a,b   Gibson, William P R ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL NATIONAL THROAT NOSE AND EAR HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c Sydney Cochlear Implant Centre   (Australia)

Author keywords

Auditory neuropathy; Congenital hearing loss; Otoacoustic emissions; Outer hair cells; Screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHILD; COCHLEA; COCHLEA FENESTRA; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; GESTATIONAL AGE; HAIR CELL; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEUROPATHY; NEWBORN HYPOXIA; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NEWBORN SCREENING; NONHUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING TEST;

AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COHORT STUDIES; DEAFNESS; HAIR CELLS, OUTER; HUMANS; INFANT; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0242491485     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200311000-00033     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fortnum HM, Summerfield Q, Marshall DH, Davis AC, Bamford JM. Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study. BMJ 2001;323:536-540.
2. Downs MP, Yoshinaga-Itano C. The efficacy of early identification and intervention for children with hearing impairment. Pediatr Clin North Am 1999;46:79-87.
3. Curnock DA. Identifying hearing impairment in infants and young children. BMJ 1993;307:1225-1226.
4. Davis A, Wood S. The epidemiology of childhood hearing impairment: factors relevant to planning of services. Br J Audiol 1992;26:72-90.
5. Prieve B, Berg A, Bradley M, et al. The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: outpatient outcome measures. Ear Hear 2000;21:104-117.
6. O'Leary SJ, Mitchell TE, Gibson WPR, Sanli H. Abnormal positive potentials in round window electrocochleography. Am J Otol 2000;21:813-818.
7. Aran JM, Darouzet J, Erre JP. Comparison des seul electrocochleographiques et d'audiogramme: etude statistique. Rev Laryngol 1974;94:477-491.
8. Dallos P. Cochlear potentials and cochlear mechanics. In: Moller AR, ed. Basic Mechanisms of Hearing. New York: Academic Press; 1973:335-376.
9. Aso S, Gibson WPR. Electrocochleography in profoundly deaf children: a comparison of transtympanic and round window techniques. Am J Otol 1994;16:231-234.
10. Harrison RV. An animal model of auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear 1998;19:355-361.
11. Bock GR, Yates GK, Deol MS. Cochlear potentials in the Bronx waltzer mutant mouse. Neurosci Lett 1982;34:19-25.
12. Harrison RV. Models of auditory neuropathy based on inner hair cell damage. In: Sinninger Y, Starr A, eds. Auditory Neuropathy: A New Perspective on Hearing Disorders. Cambridge, MA: Singular Press, 2001.
13. Shallop JK, Peterson A, Facer GW, Fabry LB, Driscoll CL. Cochlear implants in 5 cases of auditory neuropathy: postoperative findings and progress. Laryngoscope 2001;111:555-562.
14. Madden C, Hilbert L, Rutter M, Greinwald J, Choo D. Pediatric cochlear implantation in auditory neuropathy. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:163-168.
15. Gibson WPR, Sanli H. Auditory neuropathy: the use of electrophysiological tests. In: Kubo T, Takahashi Y, Iwaki T, eds. Cochlear Implants: An Update. The Hague: Kugler; 2002:53-58.
16. Mehl AL, Thompson V. The Colorado Newborn Screening Project, 1992-1999: on the threshold of effective population based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics 2002;109:E7.