Limitations of quantitative gene regulation models: A case study

Genome Research

Volumn 13, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 2391-2395

  Kim, Philip M ^a,b   Tidor, Bruce ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REGULATOR PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 0242490792     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.1207003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arkin, A., Ross, J., and McAdams, H.H. 1998. Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage λ-infected Escherichia coli cells. Genetics 149: 1633-1648.
2. Becskei, A. and Serrano, L. 2000. Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature 405: 590-593.
3. Elowitz, M.B. and Leibler, S. 2000. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403: 335-338.
4. Elowitz, M.B., Levine, A.J., Siggia, E.D., and Swain, P.S. 2002. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297: 1183-1186.
5. Endy, D., You, L., Yin, J., and Molineux, I.J. 2000. Computation, prediction, and experimental tests of fitness for bacteriophage T7 mutants with permuted genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 5375-5380.
6. Gardner, T.S., Cantor, C.R., and Collins, J.J. 2000. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature 403: 339-342.
7. Gillespie, D.T. 1977. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81: 2340-2361.
8. Guet, C.C., Elowitz, M.B., Hsing, W., and Leibler, S. 2002. Combinatorial synthesis of genetic networks. Science 296: 1466-1470.
9. Keiler, K.C., Waller, P.R., and Sauer, R.T. 1996. Role of a peptide tagging system in degradation of proteins synthesized from damaged messenger RNA. Science 271: 990-993.
10. Lutz, R. and Bujard, H. 1997. Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/l1-l1 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 1203-1210.
11. McAdams, H.H. and Arkin, A. 1997. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 814-819.
12. Rao, C.V. and Arkin, A.P. 2001. Control motifs for intracellular regulatory networks. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 3: 391-419.
13. Rosenfeld, N., Elowitz, M.B., and Alon, U. 2002. Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. J. Mol. Biol. 323: 785-793.
14. Schoeberl, B., Eicher-Johnsson, C., Gilles, E.D., and Mueller, G. 2002. Computational modeling of the dynamics of the map kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 370-375.
15. Shvartsman, S.Y., Muratov, C.B., and Lauffenburger, D.A. 2002. Modeling and computational analysis of EGF receptor-mediated cell communication in Drosophila oogenesis. Development 128: 2577-2589.
16. Somogyi, R. and Sniegoski, C.A. 1996. Modeling the complexity of genetic networks: Understanding multigenetic and pleitropic regulation. Complexity 1: 45-63.
17. Strogatz, S. 1994. Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
18. Thattai, M. and van Oudenaarden, A. 2001. Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 8614-8619.
19. van Dassow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E.M., and Odell, G.M. 2000. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406: 188-192.