Expressiveness of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS)

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 4, Issue SUPPL., 1997, Pages 655-659

  Starren, Justin ^a   Johnson, Stephen M ^a  

^a New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242485044     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hendrick RE, Paquelet JR. Is the Mammography Quality Standards Act worth the cost? American Surgeon 1995;197(1):53A-7A.
2. Paquelet JR. Medicare, mammography, and the Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992. American Surgeon 1994;190(3):47A-9A.
3. Spring DB, Kimbrell-Wilmot K. Evaluating the success of mammography at the local level: how to conduct an audit of your practice. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1987;25(5):983-92.
4. Frank MS. Computerized mammography data base systems. AJR 1993; American Journal of(2):287-90.
5. Skaane P, Amlie E. A personal-computer semiautomated report-coding system for diagnostic mammography. Eur J Rad 1993;17(1):43-6.
6. Sickles EA. The use of computers in mammography screening. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1987;25(5):1015-30.
7. Kopans DB; D'Orsi CJ; Adler DD, et al. American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). American College of Radiology; 1993.
8. Bell DS, Greenes RA. Evaluation of UltraSTAR: performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. Proceedings - the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care 1994;216-22.
9. Clayton PD, Ostler DB, Gennaro JL, Beatty SS, Frederick PR. A radiology reporting system based on most likely diagnoses. Computers & Biomedical Research 1980;13(3):258-70.
10. Moorman PW, van Ginneken AM, Siersema PD, van der Lei J, Wilson JH. Evaluation of Reporting Based on Descriptional Knowledge. JAMIA 1995;2(6):365-73.
11. Evans DA, Cimino JJ, Hersh WR, Huff SM, Bell DS. Toward a medical-concept representation language. The Canon Group. JAMIA 1994;1(3):207-17.
12. Starren, J. From Multimodal Sublanguages to Medical Data Presentations 1997; Columbia University;
13. Starren J, Johnson SB. Notations for High Efficiency Data Presentation in Mammography. JAMIA 1996;3(suppl.):557-61.
14. Draft - ACR BI Reporting and Database System. ACR. 1992;
15. Smith, S.J. Personal Communication: 1996; Comment on mammography log book.
16. Kopans DB. Standardized mammography reporting. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1992;30(1):257-64.
17. Kuhn K, Zemmler T, Reichert M, Heinlein C, Roesner D. Structured data collection and knowledge-based user guidance for abdominal ultrasound reporting. Proceedings - the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care 1993;311-5.