|
Volumn 18, Issue 65, 2002, Pages 99-102
|
Genetics research and the judicial decisions.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BIOETHICS;
BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
DIAMOND V. CHAKRABARTY;
EMBRYO RESEARCH;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PATENT;
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE;
STEM CELL;
TRANSGENIC ORGANISM;
UNITED STATES;
BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
DIAMOND V. CHAKRABARTY;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE;
BIOETHICAL ISSUES;
EMBRYO RESEARCH;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
ORGANISMS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED;
PATENTS;
STEM CELLS;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0242482784
PISSN: 11282401
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|