New cervical cancer screening techniques

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 189, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  McNeeley Jr , S Gene ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER SCREENING; CANDIDIASIS; CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COST; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC KIT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIQUID; NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; TECHNIQUE; TRICHOMONIASIS; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 0242475323     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)01081-0     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 5. Evaluation of Cervical Cytology. AHCPR Publication No. 99-E010, 1999.
2. Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, et al. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:278-84.
3. Diaz-Rosario LA, Kabawat SE. Performance of a fluid-based, thin-layer Papanicolaou smear method in the clinical setting of an independent laboratory and an outpatient screening population in New England. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999;123:817-21.
4. Bishop JW, Bigner SH, Colgan TJ, et al. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results. Acta Cytol 1998;42:189-97.
5. Abulafia O, Sherer DM. Automated cervical cytology: Meta-analyses of the performance of the AutoPap 300 QC System. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999;54:469-76.
6. ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice. New Pap Test Screening Techniques. Number 206, August 1998.